[Mim0]

New High-Priority Update (at least for EU-contries):

Quote

2010-03-05
- Added: KB976002 (Browser-choice for EU-countries)

[tfoutfou]

the KB976002 doesn't fix anything , it's just a f***ing popup that force you to choose a browser

if you don't choose Internet Explorer it doesn't uninstall it , there is no way to uninstall IE (it's integrated to deep in the system)

if you choose another browser , it's just downloading the installer as a regular executable installer

as a french user (european) i would recommand to don't slipstream this

i recommand to uncheck it in windows update and chose something called "never remind me about this update"


this update have been made "high priority" only for legal decision (to leave the choice to the final user)

but it dont really leave the choice since it don't uninstall Internet Explorer


ps : is my english correct ? not really sure !

This post has been edited by tfoutfou: 08 March 2010 - 10:05 AM

[Mim0]

tfoutfou, on 08 March 2010 - 10:04 AM, said:

ps : is my english correct ? not really sure !

I'm with you. For me, it's not the only one I don't integrate! But I want to keep the list complete and I don't want to rate an update.

For users who don't wanna see this by the file-checker, put this in the INI (an empty IGNORE-sections should already exists in the INI):

+IGNORE
H|KB976002
-

This post has been edited by Mim0: 08 March 2010 - 12:34 PM

[tfoutfou]

ok i understand your point -> having a big nice list that include ALL the update

Quote

I'm with you. For me, it's not the only one I don't integrate! But I want to keep the list complete and I don't want to rate an update.

what are the update you don't integrate ?

[Mim0]

tfoutfou, on 08 March 2010 - 01:07 PM, said:

what are the update you don't integrate ?

I integrate all except for WU/MU and these files (part of my ini):

Quote

-------------------------------------------------
! Expected updates to be ignored
! To make it more consistent the format is
! identical to the other sections, but only
! the file (column 2) is used. In column 3 you
! should add your own remarks (but do not use
! pipe-characters and backspaces).
! For col. 2 You can also use regular-expressions
! (see help for FINDSTR). When using regular-
! expressions consider that the backslash is the
! escape-character. It has to be replaced by a
! dot. When possible use just the KB-number
! (including 'KB').
-------------------------------------------------
+IGNORE
O|HF\windows-kb890830-v3.4.exe|Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.4
O|HF\KB961742-v3.exe|Enable RemoteApp to XP SP3 VMs on a Windows 7 host
O|HFSVCPACK\WindowsXP-KB967715-x86.reg|Disable Autorun for all drive-types
O|HFGUIRUNONCE\UPHClean-Setup.msi|User Profile Hive Cleanup Service 1.6d
O|HFGUIRUNONCE\messenger.msi|Windows Messenger 5.1| | \ | |Ensure that Windows Messenger 5.1 is the current version 5.1.0.715
O|HF\WindowsRightsManagementServicesSP2-KB979099-Client-x86-!ln979099!.exe|Rights Management Services Client with SP2
H|HFSVCPACK_SW1\windowsxp-kb976002-v5-x86-enu.exe|Browser-choice for EU-countries
-

Only the KB-No in col 2 (from my prev. example) is not working (but it should work. why isn't it working? )

This post has been edited by Mim0: 08 March 2010 - 01:48 PM

[jvidal]

MIMo, MRT v3.5 released today!

[Mim0]

jvidal, on 09 March 2010 - 08:31 AM, said:

MIMo, MRT v3.5 released today!

Yes. Patch-day is a normal update-day. Later a sec-bulletin for XP will also be available.

[Mim0]

Quote

2010-03-09
- Added: Malicious Software Removal Tool 3.5
- Added: MS10-016: Movie Maker (KB975561)
- Added: Protocol negotiation for RPC over HTTP Authentication (KB974841)
- Removed: Malicious Software Removal Tool 3.4

[theruan]

theruan, on 04 March 2010 - 09:34 PM, said:

Martin H, on 02 March 2010 - 02:32 PM, said:

Quote

"i have found at least 20 updates in there that are needed in the update process."

Needed??? Hotfixes are fixes for non-widespread, non-critical issues, which is developed fast and hasen't gone through as much regression-testing as the normal updates...

Also, since HFSLIP allready is using the QFE branch of the updates, then the files in the updates allready include the fixes from the hotfixes(only for the included files in the updates that is...)

Sorry, i may have used a worng word for that, i'm brazilian, my english isn't that good, lol.
A good word would be as optional updates, and also, you that obviously knows more about updates Tommyp could take a better look on them.
In HF folder:
...
...
...
All of this ones were taken from thehotfixshare, i know that may be not all of them are available in every language and so far will sometimes be hard to acquire them, but they still are hotfixes that could or not be added to the list.
They are optional, and still have to check if they are not replaced already.
What i can say for sure is that i have tried using them with nlite to see if any problems related to older updates beeing used and so far it showed me only five(or something like that) updates that were replaced that i already removed from my list.

Also i think you could remove this:
missing (S): HF\WindowsXP-KB960225-x86-PTB.EXE (MS09-007: SChannel (Secure Channel))
as this check in my opinion is not need 'cause it's replaced, only the new one sould be checked.

Thanks
TheRuan

Ok guys, new list checked and re-checked everything twice.
The versions are organized in this way: KB - files - original version - update version.
I have removed "5.1.2600." from the updates that have only 4 digits in versions.
WindowsXP-KB944898-x86-PTB.EXE

cscdll.dll 5512 5586
mrxsmb.sys 5911 5586

WindowsXP-KB945436-x86-PTB.EXE

usbccgp.sys 5512 5585

WindowsXP-KB946554-x86-PTB.EXE
cimwin32.dll 5512 5591

WindowsXP-KB946775-x86-PTB.EXE
ndiswan.sys 5512 5584

WindowsXP-KB948046-v2-x86-PTB.EXE >>>>>>>> NOT NEEDED
(ONLY COULD CHECK THIS THIS FILES ON THE UPDATE OTHERS DON'T HAVE VERSION INFO)
pcl4res.dll 0.3.5479.0 0.3.5479.0
pcl5eres.dll 0.3.5479.0 0.3.5479.0
pcl5ures.dll 0.3.5479.0 0.3.5479.0
pclxl.dll 0.3.5479.0 0.3.5479.0
unidrv.dll 0.3.6002.22136 0.3.6001.22116
unidrvui.dll 0.3.6002.22136 0.3.6001.22116
unires.dll 0.3.6002.22136 0.3.6001.22116

WindowsXP-KB948101-v3-x86-PTB.EXE
usbohci.sys 5512 5550

WindowsXP-KB948277-x86-PTB.EXE
licdll.dll 5512 5587
msgina.dll 5512 5587
winlogon.exe 5512 5587

WindowsXP-KB948720-x86-PTB.EXE
setupapi.dll 5512 5603

WindowsXP-KB949033-x86-PTB.EXE
usbehci.sys 5512 5587

WindowsXP-KB949127-v2-x86-PTB.EXE
wzcsvc.dll 5512 5585

WindowsXP-KB949764-x86-PTB.EXE
usbport.sys 5512 5551

WindowsXP-KB949900-x86-PTB.EXE
shimeng.dll 5512 5555

WindowsXP-KB950162-x86-PTB.exe >>>> Not Needed

WindowsXP-KB950312-x86-PTB.EXE
winsrv.dll 5512 5585

>>>> WindowsXP-KB950565-x86-PTB.EXE >>>> Not Needed

WindowsXP-KB950616-x86-PTB.EXE
portcls.sys 5512 5566

WindowsXP-KB950982-x86-PTB.EXE
odbc32.dll 3.525.1132.0 3.525.3000.0
odbccp32.dll 3.525.1132.0 3.525.3000.0

WindowsXP-KB951312-x86-PTB.EXE >>>>>>> NOT SURE
Weird this found two files here:
NTDLL.DLL in i386 folder 5755 5594
NTDLL.DLL in i386\system32 5512 5594

WindowsXP-KB951347-x86-PTB.EXE
fxscomex.dll 5.2.2600.5512 5588

WindowsXP-KB951624-x86-PTB.EXE
hnetcfg.dll 5512 5589
ipnathlp.dll 5584 5589

WindowsXP-KB951709-x86-PTB.EXE
disk.sys 5512 5597

WindowsXP-KB951822-v2-x86-PTB.EXE
alpsres.dll 0.3.1281.0 0.3.1282.0

WindowsXP-KB951937-v2-x86-PTB.EXE >>>>> NOT NEEDED
msadce.dll 2.81.3010.0 2.81.3001.0

WindowsXP-KB952079-v2-x86-PTB.EXE
ntfs.sys 5512 5585

WindowsXP-KB952117-v2-x86-PTB.EXE
ndis.sys 5512 5588
ndiswan.sys 5512 5588

WindowsXP-KB953028-x86-PTB.EXE
d3d9.dll 5.3.2600.5512 5.3.2600.5601

WindowsXP-KB817688-x86-PTB.EXE
ntbackup.exe 5512 5808

WindowsXP-KB889320-v2-x86-PTB.EXE
browser.dll 5512 5574

WindowsXP-KB932521-x86-PTB.EXE >>>>>> NoT NEEDED
rastls.dll 5886 5586

WindowsXP-KB940648-x86-PTB.EXE
mup.sys 5512 5589 <<<<<< NEEDED <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
wkssvc.dll 5826 5589 <<<<<<< NOT NEEDED


WindowsXP-KB943326-x86-PTB.EXE <<<< NOT NEEDED
win32k.sys 5863 5612

WindowsXP-KB974266.exe(RUNONCE UPDATE TYPE)
gpprefcl.dll 5.2.3790.4568 5.2.3790.4569
This ones i could'nt get their version
>>polbase.mof
>>polpro.mof
>>polproc.mof
>>polprocl.mfl
>>polprocl.mof
>>polprou.mof
>>spupdsvc.exe


I agree this aren't exactly essential updates, i do use them because i like to be on the end point of updates, what could be done is to add another category like HOTFIXES, or if you don't think they are usefull to trash list, shaushaushau.

There are some updates that aren't needed, i removed in the beginning until i have realized that someone else could use to see the not needed aswell.

Sorry to take so long but i wasn't home until yesterday.

Thanks

This post has been edited by theruan: 09 March 2010 - 10:15 PM

[Mim0]

THX for this nice work.

theruan, on 09 March 2010 - 10:13 PM, said:

I agree this aren't exactly essential updates, i do use them because i like to be on the end point of updates

That's what I have also in mind

theruan, on 09 March 2010 - 10:13 PM, said:

what could be done is to add another category like HOTFIXES

There is already a HOTFIXES-ini-setting:

Mim0, on 10 February 2010 - 12:20 PM, said:

Quote

2010-02-10
- Fixed: There was a typo at KB977377 (! instead of |)
- Added: Some obsolete updates
- Added: INI-setting HOTFIXES to disable/enable list missing hotfixes
- Added: KB961451, Hotfix: MDAC (identity-attribute in combination with ADO)
- Added: KB974905, Hotfix: MBR file or a live stream with more than 32 streams

Regarding new INI-settings, the easiest way is to let hfslipfc create a new ini and see whats new.

Hotfixes are disabled by default. And so it's no risk to include these additional hotfixes in the file-checker.

Now I'm thinking about my update-list. Probably it's a little bit confusing to have so much hotfixes inside. Do I make two lists? (one with hotfixes, another w/o hotfixes). Hmm...

[bphlpt]

Mim0, on 10 March 2010 - 01:55 AM, said:

Now I'm thinking about my update-list. Probably it's a little bit confusing to have so much hotfixes inside. Do I make two lists? (one with hotfixes, another w/o hotfixes). Hmm...

I like the idea of everything in one list, and having the list and the File-checker in sync, ie covering the same things. Maybe a separate Table for "optional" Hotfixes that don't belong in your other tables? Just my two cents.

Cheers and Regards

[Mim0]

bphlpt, on 10 March 2010 - 12:37 PM, said:

Maybe a separate Table for "optional" Hotfixes that don't belong in your other tables?

Hmm... No bad idea! Then I have still one list but don't blow up the already existing tables. I keep in in my mind. THX!!!

2010-03-10
- Added: Replacement-info for KB970238 (optional KB974841 can replace 
     	KB970238/MS09-026)

Mimo

[Lilla]

Mim0, on 08 March 2010 - 01:41 PM, said:

I integrate all except for WU/MU and these files (part of my ini):

Quote

-------------------------------------------------
! Expected updates to be ignored
! To make it more consistent the format is
! identical to the other sections, but only
! the file (column 2) is used. In column 3 you
! should add your own remarks (but do not use
! pipe-characters and backspaces).
! For col. 2 You can also use regular-expressions
! (see help for FINDSTR). When using regular-
! expressions consider that the backslash is the
! escape-character. It has to be replaced by a
! dot. When possible use just the KB-number
! (including 'KB').
-------------------------------------------------
+IGNORE
O|HF\windows-kb890830-v3.4.exe|Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.4
O|HF\KB961742-v3.exe|Enable RemoteApp to XP SP3 VMs on a Windows 7 host
O|HFSVCPACK\WindowsXP-KB967715-x86.reg|Disable Autorun for all drive-types
O|HFGUIRUNONCE\UPHClean-Setup.msi|User Profile Hive Cleanup Service 1.6d
O|HFGUIRUNONCE\messenger.msi|Windows Messenger 5.1| | \ | |Ensure that Windows Messenger 5.1 is the current version 5.1.0.715
O|HF\WindowsRightsManagementServicesSP2-KB979099-Client-x86-!ln979099!.exe|Rights Management Services Client with SP2
H|HFSVCPACK_SW1\windowsxp-kb976002-v5-x86-enu.exe|Browser-choice for EU-countries
-

Mimo, regarding...

2009-10 Enable RemoteApp to XP SP3 VMs on a Windows 7 host Optional KB961742 KB961742-v3.exe HF

Hummm... Seeing the above in your +Ignore list caused me to go back and read the related article again. Given my limited understanding of VM, I do not fully understand the article. However, after reading it more closely I now realize that I should not have included it in my build (as I was doing until reading your post), instead I should have added it in my +Ignore list (something I did only after reading your post).

Perhaps a hint could be added to help others avoid making the mistake I made.

SUGGESTION, add a hint such as the one below (or other words of your choosing):
Include only if you are installing Win XP SP3 on a Virtual Machine running on a computer running Windows Vista. Read article for details.

PROBLEM. Unfortunately, I used a HFSLIP build where I had included it when I did a fresh install of Windows XP Pro on my sister's computer after her power supply went bad. While her machine seems to work OK so far, I would like to undo the file changes made by this update ASAP. The article includes a list of files included in the update. Can I simply replace these files with ones from a computer installed without this update? Or, do I need to unregister the old and re-register the new dlls? Did the update delete any files that I need to add back? Is there anything else I need to consider in reversing this update?

Thanks for any advice on this,
Lilla

This post has been edited by Lilla: 14 March 2010 - 01:15 PM

[Mim0]

Hi Lilla,

regarding uninstalling KB961742-v3 manually I cannot say anything. Sorry.

Making a hint for this update is no prob.

But can you tell me whats the problem when using this update? Are there any disadvantages when running XP on your sister's computer?

Mimo

[Lilla]

Mim0, on 14 March 2010 - 12:54 PM, said:

Hi Lilla,

regarding uninstalling KB961742-v3 manually I cannot say anything. Sorry.

Making a hint for this update is no prob.

But can you tell me whats the problem when using this update? Are there any disadvantages when running XP on your sister's computer?

Mimo

Mimo, thanks for reply. So far I'm not aware of any problems with her computer. But I'm concerned because as they say "I don't know what I don't know". She is a average sort of user and most likely would not recognize subtle problems.

Opinions on this would be most welcome: Is it OK to run a regular computer (not a VM) with this update slipstreamed?

This post has been edited by Lilla: 14 March 2010 - 02:49 PM

[oguz2]

Hi @Mim0 ,
Where i can download your file-checker (HFSLIPFC) for HFSLIP application? I don't find any download link for this application?
Ok, i find it

This post has been edited by oguz2: 15 March 2010 - 04:10 PM

[TeddyBeers]

Mim0, on 11 December 2009 - 02:44 AM, said:

You can grab this tool from my Windows XP SP3 Update-List. (change-log)

[Mim0]

2010-03-18
- Added: Workaround for fixing problem described in KB972582 (shdocvw.dl_)

But see the test-releases thread for the current state of this "problem"

[Trustee]

Thank you. I'm doing a version for w2k.

[Mim0]

2010-03-25
- Added: Tommy's solution as first choice for fixing problem described 
 		in KB972582. But if you prefer extraction shdocvw.dll manually
 		it will make tommy's soluton obsolete.
- Added: KB980302 (IE8 Compatibility View List)
- Removed: KB978506 (IE8 Compatibility View List)

This post has been edited by Mim0: 25 March 2010 - 01:55 PM