MSFN Forum: The File-Checker (HFSLIPFC) for HFSLIP - MSFN Forum

Jump to content


  • 70 Pages +
  • « First
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The File-Checker (HFSLIPFC) for HFSLIP Checks the content of the HFSLIP-folders (Windows XP & 2000) Rate Topic: -----

#341 User is offline   Mim0 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 715
  • Joined: 23-September 08

Posted 03 May 2010 - 01:31 PM

file-checker
2010-05-03
- Fixed: Minor update-check/download-problem


XP-update-list
2010-05-03
- Fixed: Problem with old MSXML4-setting was not completely solved before.



#342 User is offline   Parseus 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 03-October 09
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 06 May 2010 - 02:23 AM

I found something strange in the File Checker:

REM
ECHO.>>hfslipfc.ini
ECHO ------------------------------------------------->>hfslipfc.ini
ECHO ! File with update-lists. When using more than one>>hfslipfc.ini
ECHO ! list, separate them by semicolon.>>hfslipfc.ini
ECHO !>>hfslipfc.ini
ECHO ! Default (Windows 2000):>>hfslipfc.ini
ECHO ! %fileSet2k%>>hfslipfc.ini
ECHO !>>hfslipfc.ini
ECHO ! Default (Windows XP):>>hfslipfc.ini
ECHO ! %fileSetXp%>>hfslipfc.ini
ECHO ------------------------------------------------->>hfslipfc.ini
ECHO FILESET=>>hfslipfc.ini


Variables %fileSet2k% and %fileSetXp% exist only here, I can't find them anywhere else in script.

#343 User is offline   ZEUS__ 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 185
  • Joined: 03-January 08
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 06 May 2010 - 04:19 AM

View PostMim0, on 03 May 2010 - 01:31 PM, said:

file-checker
2010-05-03
- Fixed: Minor update-check/download-problem


XP-update-list
2010-05-03
- Fixed: Problem with old MSXML4-setting was not completely solved before.



thanks for fix..

#344 User is offline   jvidal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 661
  • Joined: 14-November 05

Posted 11 May 2010 - 12:29 PM

Mimo, new ver. required.
- New MRT 3.7 replaces 3.6
- KB978542 replaces KB973354 (OE6 update)

#345 User is offline   Mim0 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 715
  • Joined: 23-September 08

Posted 11 May 2010 - 03:43 PM

View Postjvidal, on 11 May 2010 - 12:29 PM, said:

Mimo, new ver. required.
- New MRT 3.7 replaces 3.6
- KB978542 replaces KB973354 (OE6 update)
Yes, Sir, I know! :D

2010-05-11
- Added: KB978542 (MS10-030: Outlook Express, replaces KB951066 and KB973354)
- Removed: KB951066 (MS08-048: Outlook Express)
- Removed: KB973354 (part of MS09-037: Active Template Library (ATL))
- Added: Malicious Software Removal Tool 3.7
- Removed: Malicious Software Removal Tool 3.6



#346 User is offline   jvidal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 661
  • Joined: 14-November 05

Posted 11 May 2010 - 04:15 PM

thx.
but are you SURE it also replaces 951066????? nothing was said about 951066 on the KB article, only that it replaced 973354.

#347 User is offline   theruan 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 13-May 08

Posted 11 May 2010 - 07:10 PM

View PostMim0, on 11 May 2010 - 03:43 PM, said:

View Postjvidal, on 11 May 2010 - 12:29 PM, said:

Mimo, new ver. required.
- New MRT 3.7 replaces 3.6
- KB978542 replaces KB973354 (OE6 update)
Yes, Sir, I know! :D

2010-05-11
- Added: KB978542 (MS10-030: Outlook Express, replaces KB951066 and KB973354)
- Removed: KB951066 (MS08-048: Outlook Express)
- Removed: KB973354 (part of MS09-037: Active Template Library (ATL))
- Added: Malicious Software Removal Tool 3.7
- Removed: Malicious Software Removal Tool 3.6



Long time no post in here.

Just entered in a loop today when updating the filechecker, it kept trying to update. After closing and reopening it went back to normal, just reporting, as it seems to work fine.
By the way, keep the good job!

EDIT:
I was trying to add an exclude inside the ini settings file for browser choice
how should it be done?
Didn't undestood about the columms, maybe that's my mistake.
Is this correct?
+IGNORE
windowsxp-kb976002-v5-x86-enu.exe
-

This post has been edited by theruan: 11 May 2010 - 07:15 PM


#348 User is online   -X- 

  • Member
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 2,068
  • Joined: 08-January 04
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 11 May 2010 - 10:17 PM

View Postjvidal, on 11 May 2010 - 04:15 PM, said:

thx.
but are you SURE it also replaces 951066????? nothing was said about 951066 on the KB article, only that it replaced 973354.


951066 contains inetcomm.dll which is included in 978542. MS missed that in their bulletin.

#349 User is offline   Mim0 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 715
  • Joined: 23-September 08

Posted 11 May 2010 - 10:28 PM

View Postjvidal, on 11 May 2010 - 04:15 PM, said:

thx.
but are you SURE it also replaces 951066????? nothing was said about 951066 on the KB article, only that it replaced 973354.

Yes, this is correct - at least for XP/SP3 which I maintain (W2K I don't know...). Things which appear not apparently are described always more detailed in the changelog of my update-list:

Quote

KB978542 (inetcomm.dll 6.0.2900.5931 and msoe.dll 6.0.2900.5931) replaces KB951066 (Inetcomm.dll 6.0.2900.5579) and KB973354 (Msoe.dll 6.0.2900.5843)



View Posttheruan, on 11 May 2010 - 07:10 PM, said:

Just entered in a loop today when updating the filechecker, it kept trying to update. After closing and reopening it went back to normal, just reporting, as it seems to work fine.
By the way, keep the good job!
Hmm... can you tell me more about that? What was your previous file-chekcer-version?

View Posttheruan, on 11 May 2010 - 07:10 PM, said:

I was trying to add an exclude inside the ini settings file for browser choice
how should it be done?
Didn't undestood about the columms, maybe that's my mistake.
Is this correct?
+IGNORE
windowsxp-kb976002-v5-x86-enu.exe
-
For the INGNORE-section you have to use the following format (probably I have to explain it more detailed):

The tables have three columns which are seperated by a pipe-character.
Column 1: Type of update
S = Security update
A = Security advisory
H = High-priority update
O = Optional update
F = Hotfix
R = Obsolete update (replaced)
Column 2: Path and Name of the file.
Column 3: Description (pipe-chars and backspaces are not allowed). Optional.

The easiest way is to copy the line from the update-list (hfslipfc-xp.cmd)

Quote

H|HFSVCPACK_SW1\windowsxp-kb976002-v5-x86-enu.exe|Browser-choice for EU-countries


Mimo

This post has been edited by Mim0: 11 May 2010 - 10:42 PM


#350 User is offline   Parseus 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 03-October 09
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 11 May 2010 - 11:18 PM

View PostMim0, on 11 May 2010 - 10:28 PM, said:

Yes, this is correct - at least for XP/SP3 which I maintain (W2K I don't know...).


For Windows 2000 it's much simpler - KB951066 has already been replaced by KB973354, which is now replaced by KB978542.

#351 User is offline   jvidal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 661
  • Joined: 14-November 05

Posted 11 May 2010 - 11:36 PM

thx guys.
anyone tried slipstreaming w/o 951066 and 973354, but with 978542? WU happy?

#352 User is offline   theruan 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 13-May 08

Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:02 AM

Don't know exactly, but just some hours before you updated i had downloaded the previous version.

This post has been edited by theruan: 12 May 2010 - 10:02 AM


#353 User is offline   Mim0 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 715
  • Joined: 23-September 08

Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:46 AM

View Posttheruan, on 12 May 2010 - 10:02 AM, said:

Don't know exactly, but just some hours before you updated i had downloaded the previous version.
that should work probs. When you used an older version (before splitting it into two files to support Parseus W2K-list) it could had such probs. I'll look for it.

#354 User is offline   jvidal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 661
  • Joined: 14-November 05

Posted 12 May 2010 - 01:20 PM

Mimo, your page is down!

This post has been edited by jvidal: 12 May 2010 - 01:20 PM


#355 User is offline   Mim0 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 715
  • Joined: 23-September 08

Posted 12 May 2010 - 06:01 PM

View Postjvidal, on 12 May 2010 - 01:20 PM, said:

Mimo, your page is down!
Yes, sh*t happens :(

But it's online again! :) new URL: http://mimo.zxq.net/

File-checker
2010-05-13
- Fixed: URL for update-check (new web location)



XP-update-list
2010-05-13
- Fixed: URL for update-check (new web location)



I'm sorry but my old web-hoster killed my site. For all users who are using automatic update: you have to d/l the current version manually.

This post has been edited by Mim0: 12 May 2010 - 06:05 PM


#356 User is offline   jvidal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 661
  • Joined: 14-November 05

Posted 13 May 2010 - 12:48 PM

thx, Mimo!

#357 User is offline   jvidal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 661
  • Joined: 14-November 05

Posted 14 May 2010 - 03:34 PM

Well, I slipstreamed and everything went fine...

bye!

This post has been edited by jvidal: 14 May 2010 - 03:35 PM


#358 User is offline   Parseus 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 03-October 09
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 16 May 2010 - 02:15 PM

HFSLIPFC doesn't detect extracted DX9. XP extension must be at fault, because my 2K extension correctly detects extracted DX9.

#359 User is offline   My2GirlsDad 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 97
  • Joined: 28-December 08
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 16 May 2010 - 05:06 PM

View PostParseus, on 16 May 2010 - 02:15 PM, said:

HFSLIPFC doesn't detect extracted DX9. XP extension must be at fault, because my 2K extension correctly detects extracted DX9.


I have the same problem Parseus. Apart from the DX9 problem, everything else seems to be fine with XP extension.

My2GirlsDad

#360 User is offline   Mim0 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 715
  • Joined: 23-September 08

Posted 16 May 2010 - 10:30 PM

@Parseus&M2GD
Thx for reporting this.

btw.. extracted DX9 was detected (and used correctly) but the output (at the beginning) was not correct.

New version today...

Share this topic:


  • 70 Pages +
  • « First
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

10 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 10 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2013 msfn.org
Privacy Policy