[Mim0]

Mim0, on 12 July 2010 - 03:54 AM, said:

NLZ, on 12 July 2010 - 03:24 AM, said:

After I updated wmp11, the log still says the second line. I have filever.exe in hftools and running the hfslipfc.cmd as admin (win7). Am I doing something wrong, or this error message is normal?

No, it's not normal. I'll check it...

THX for reporting this!

new file-checker

2010-07-12
- Removed: Extracting filever.exe from SOURCE\SUPPORT\TOOLS\SUPPORT.CAB
         is moved from the file-checker to the fc-extension for XP.
- Fixed: Forgotten to echo round brackets with escape-char 
         (follows with wrong output of file-version-check-results 
         to screen and to log-file)

new file-checker extension for xp:

2010-07-12
- Added: Extracting filever.exe from SOURCE\SUPPORT\TOOLS\SUPPORT.CAB
         is moved from the file-checker to the fc-extension for XP.

This post has been edited by Mim0: 12 July 2010 - 01:04 PM

[Mim0]

new file-checker extension for xp:

2010-07-15
- Added: KB2229593 (MS10-042: Help and Support Center)
- Added: Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.9
- Removed: Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.8

[Trustee]

Hello. I have a winxp cd with SP3 and I installed the updates that I recommended HFSLIPFC.

The windows update tells me I need:
WindowsXP-KB941569-x86-

use the WMP9

Regards

[Mim0]

Trustee, on 16 July 2010 - 09:38 AM, said:

Hello. I have a winxp cd with SP3 and I installed the updates that I recommended HFSLIPFC.

The windows update tells me I need:
WindowsXP-KB941569-x86-

use the WMP9

Regards

Hi Trustee,
please, would you tell me the version of the following DLLs on this installation?

• wmasf.dll
  
• wmvcore.dll

I just finished also my new installation. But with WMP11. Windows-Update is satisfied.

Mimo

This post has been edited by Mim0: 16 July 2010 - 03:39 PM

[Trustee]

Mim0, on 16 July 2010 - 03:36 PM, said:

Trustee, on 16 July 2010 - 09:38 AM, said:

Hello. I have a winxp cd with SP3 and I installed the updates that I recommended HFSLIPFC.

The windows update tells me I need:
WindowsXP-KB941569-x86-

use the WMP9

Regards

Hi Trustee,
please, would you tell me the version of the following DLLs on this installation?

• wmasf.dll
  
• wmvcore.dll

I just finished also my new installation. But with WMP11. Windows-Update is satisfied.

Mimo

Hi

wmasf.dll 10.0.0.3802
wmvcore.dll 10.0.0.4078

Regards

[Mim0]

Trustee, on 16 July 2010 - 05:44 PM, said:

wmasf.dll 10.0.0.3802
wmvcore.dll 10.0.0.4078

Normally SP3 includes the following DLLs:
wmasf.dll 9.00.00.4503
wmvcore.dll 9.0.0.4503

But something has installed WMP10 / WMP10-DLLs on your system.

For WMP10 there is something new in KB941569:
wmasf.dll 10.0.0.4060

Can you check which update installed WMP10 / WMP10-DLLs?

CU...

[My2GirlsDad]

Mim0, on 15 July 2010 - 10:31 PM, said:

new file-checker extension for xp:

2010-07-15
- Added: KB2229593 (MS10-042: Help and Support Center)
- Added: Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.9
- Removed: Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.8

Mimo,

I found a typo with your new XP extension.

R|HF\windows-kb890830-v3.7.exe|Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.8, replaced by v3.9
H|HF\windows-kb890830-v3.8.exe|Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.9

Oops!!

M2GD

[Trustee]

Quote

Normally SP3 includes the following DLLs:
wmasf.dll 9.00.00.4503
wmvcore.dll 9.0.0.4503

But something has installed WMP10 / WMP10-DLLs on your system.

For WMP10 there is something new in KB941569:
wmasf.dll 10.0.0.4060

Can you check which update installed WMP10 / WMP10-DLLs?

CU...

Hi

With SP3
wmasf.dll 10.0.0.3802
wmvcore.dll 10.0.0.4078

With KB941569
wmasf.dll 10.0.0.4060
wmvcore.dll 10.0.0.4078

This post has been edited by Trustee: 17 July 2010 - 04:35 PM

[jvidal]

Got another bug for ya, mimo (regarding MRT). HFSLIPC still wants MRT 3.8 and flags 3.9 as unneeded. (probably related to what My2girls dad reported).

BTW, how do I permanently hide an update I don't want?
For example: 977377 breaks more than what it fixes, I want it gone for good.
Also, browser choice for EU countries doesn't apply here (I'm not in europe).

I want to exclude those FOREVER...

how?

bye!

Edit: forget about the MRT, I fixed it by correcting the typo. Still I would like to know how to exclude unwanted updates.

This post has been edited by jvidal: 17 July 2010 - 08:56 PM

[Parseus]

jvidal, on 17 July 2010 - 08:52 PM, said:

Still I would like to know how to exclude unwanted updates.

You can always use IGNORE section in hfslipfc.ini or remove unwanted updates in XP extension.

[Mim0]

My2GirlsDad, on 17 July 2010 - 03:25 PM, said:

I found a typo with your new XP extension.

R|HF\windows-kb890830-v3.7.exe|Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.8, replaced by v3.9
H|HF\windows-kb890830-v3.8.exe|Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.9

jvidal, on 17 July 2010 - 08:52 PM, said:

Got another bug for ya, mimo (regarding MRT). HFSLIPC still wants MRT 3.8 and flags 3.9 as unneeded. (probably related to what My2girls dad reported).

Thx you both. Fix it asap...

[Mim0]

jvidal, on 17 July 2010 - 08:52 PM, said:

BTW, how do I permanently hide an update I don't want?
For example: 977377 breaks more than what it fixes, I want it gone for good.
Also, browser choice for EU countries doesn't apply here (I'm not in europe).

I want to exclude those FOREVER...

how?

As Parseus said, the IGNORE-section in the hfslipfc.ini is for that purpose. As an example, here is my IGNORE-section:

-------------------------------------------------
! Expected updates to be ignored
! To make it more consistent the format is
! identical to the other sections, but only
! the file (column 2) is used. In column 3 you
! should add your own remarks (but do not use
! pipe-characters and backspaces).
! For col. 2 You can also use regular-expressions
! (see help for FINDSTR). When using regular-
! expressions consider that the backslash is the
! escape-character. It has to be replaced by a
! dot. When possible use just the KB-number
! (including 'KB').
-------------------------------------------------
+IGNORE
O|kb890830|Malicious Software Removal Tool
O|HF\KB961742-v3.exe|Enable RemoteApp to XP SP3 VMs on a Windows 7 host
O|HFSVCPACK\WindowsXP-KB967715-x86.reg|Disable Autorun for all drive-types
O|HFGUIRUNONCE\UPHClean-Setup.msi|User Profile Hive Cleanup Service 1.6d
O|HFGUIRUNONCE\messenger.msi|Windows Messenger 5.1| | \ | |Ensure that Windows Messenger 5.1 is the current version 5.1.0.715
O|HF\WindowsRightsManagementServicesSP2-KB979099-Client-x86-!ln979099!.exe|Rights Management Services Client with SP2
H|HFSVCPACK_SW1\windowsxp-kb976002-v5-x86-enu.exe|Browser-choice for EU-countries
-

[Mim0]

Trustee, on 17 July 2010 - 04:09 PM, said:

Hi

With SP3
wmasf.dll 10.0.0.3802
wmvcore.dll 10.0.0.4078

With KB941569
wmasf.dll 10.0.0.4060
wmvcore.dll 10.0.0.4078

Hiho!
The question was, why do you have wmasf 10.x on your system and why not 9.x?

You said, you selected WMP9. Then I would expect wmasf 9.x

[Trustee]

Mim0, on 18 July 2010 - 01:44 PM, said:

Hiho!
The question was, why do you have wmasf 10.x on your system and why not 9.x?

You said, you selected WMP9. Then I would expect wmasf 9.x

I have a selected in the. Ini WM9

Attached File(s)

•  hfslipfc.ini (9.47K)
  Number of downloads: 7

[Mim0]

Trustee, on 18 July 2010 - 02:56 PM, said:

I have a selected in the. Ini WM9

I have no idea which update brings the 10.x.DLLs on the system. Do you?

I think I reactivate this update for WMP9...

Hmmm...

[Lions]

Mim0, on 18 July 2010 - 03:00 PM, said:

Trustee, on 18 July 2010 - 02:56 PM, said:

I have a selected in the. Ini WM9

I have no idea which update brings the 10.x.DLLs on the system. Do you?

I think I reactivate this update for WMP9...

Hmmm...

Hi all,

I think this is an HFSLIP (1.7.9. & 1.7.10. beta x) problem, which does not properly handle the WMP multiple updates in respect of WMP9.

You can see also this post (http://www.msfn.org/...post__p__916989), referring to KB973540, but the problem (in my experience) is common to all WMP multiple updates.

For now, the only way I could solve this problem was to put all WMP multiple updates in in \HFSVCPACK_SW1 folder.

Ciao

Lions

[Mim0]

Lions, on 19 July 2010 - 10:11 AM, said:

I think this is an HFSLIP (1.7.9. & 1.7.10. beta x) problem, which does not properly handle the WMP multiple updates in respect of WMP9.

You can see also this post (http://www.msfn.org/...post__p__916989), referring to KB973540, but the problem (in my experience) is common to all WMP multiple updates.

For now, the only way I could solve this problem was to put all WMP multiple updates in in \HFSVCPACK_SW1 folder.

Hi Lions,
thx for the hint. After reading this thread I think the problem is not the same - all is running here. But I looked what's inside of wmfdist95.exe (what's the problematic update in your linked topic): wmasf.dll 10.0.0.3802 (and much more)

But wmfdist95.exe is the reason why KB941569 is needed (I think).

I will make a test...

If my thought is correct, I add a dependency in the file-checker that KB941569 is expected if wmfdist95.exe was found.

Otherwise I will put back KB941569 to this list in general for WMP9.

This post has been edited by Mim0: 20 July 2010 - 01:27 AM

[Mim0]

(...)

This post has been edited by Mim0: 20 July 2010 - 01:26 AM

[Mim0]

Mim0, on 19 July 2010 - 10:49 PM, said:

...
But wmfdist95.exe is the reason why KB941569 is needed (I think).
I will make a test...
If my thought is correct, I add a dependency in the file-checker that KB941569 is expected if wmfdist95.exe was found.
...

So, I've tested the following:
using the setting from Trustee with the following changes:
- no WU/MU (I think it doesn't makes the difference)
- DON'T using wmfdist95.exe

The result: Windows-Update doesn't expecting KB941569!

So KB941569 is only needed when using WMP9+wmfdist95.exe!!!

New file-checker extension for XP:

2010-07-20
- Fixed: Reactivated KB941569 and added a dependency: This update is needed 
         when using the combination WMP9 + wmfdist95.exe (KB891122)
- Fixed: Update-check for Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.9

Thx @ all for reporting these bugs!!!

This post has been edited by Mim0: 20 July 2010 - 02:35 PM

[My2GirlsDad]

Mim0, on 20 July 2010 - 02:33 PM, said:

Mim0, on 19 July 2010 - 10:49 PM, said:

...
But wmfdist95.exe is the reason why KB941569 is needed (I think).
I will make a test...
If my thought is correct, I add a dependency in the file-checker that KB941569 is expected if wmfdist95.exe was found.
...

So, I've tested the following:
using the setting from Trustee with the following changes:
- no WU/MU (I think it doesn't makes the difference)
- DON'T using wmfdist95.exe

The result: Windows-Update doesn't expecting KB941569!

So KB941569 is only needed when using WMP9+wmfdist95.exe!!!

New file-checker extension for XP:

2010-07-20
- Fixed: Reactivated KB941569 and added a dependency: This update is needed 
         when using the combination WMP9 + wmfdist95.exe (KB891122)
- Fixed: Update-check for Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.9

Thx @ all for reporting these bugs!!!

Mimo,

With your new extension I'm getting KB941569 missing. I have wmp11 in the ini file. You said it only necessary for wmp9.

Can you correct this or should I put it in IGNORE?

Thanks for you time.

M2GD