[rulman]

KB2641653 replace KB2660465
KB2621440 replace KB2570222
KB2647518 replace KB2618451

[jvidal]

exactly, here we go again. plus MRT 4.6 replaces 4.5

[Mim0]

new filechecker extension for Windows XP:

2012-03-14
- Added: KB2641653 (MS12-018: Windows Kernel-Mode Drivers)
- Added: KB2621440 (MS12-020: Remote Desktop Protocol)
- Added: KB2647518 (Security Advisory 2647518: ActiveX Kill Bits)
- Added: KB890830 (Malicious Software Removal Tool 4.6.600.0)
- Added: KB2681116 (Daylight saving time (DST) update for Chile)
- Removed: KB2660465 (MS12-008: Windows Kernel-Mode Drivers, replaced by KB2641653)
- Removed: KB2570222 (MS11-065: Remote Desktop Protocol, replaced by KB2621440)
- Removed: KB890830 (Malicious Software Removal Tool 4.5.5900.0)

Download: HFSLIPFC v.2011/11/16 with WindowsXP-update-list v.2012/03/14

[ZEUS__]

First of all, so thanks Mimo..

when I put KB2681116 to HF folder it says;

Found wrong, obsolete or unknown update(s)

Quote

unknown: HF\WindowsXP-KB2681116-x86-TRK.exe

but on here;
Found non-existing update(s) for Windows XP SP3

Quote

not found (F): HF\WindowsXP-KB2681116-x86-TRKexe (Daylight saving time (DST) update for Chile)

I think there is a typo.

[jvidal]

of course, just edit the script and put that missing dot before "exe" and after "TRK"

I found another typo. The script expects version 4.5.6000 of MRT instead of 4.6.6000...

BTW, it is also flagging my WindowsXP-KB2681116-X86-ESN.exe as unknown

This post has been edited by jvidal: 14 March 2012 - 08:24 PM

[Mim0]

What should I do without you...?

ZEUS__, on 14 March 2012 - 02:32 PM, said:

Found wrong, obsolete or unknown update(s)

Quote

unknown: HF\WindowsXP-KB2681116-x86-TRK.exe

Thx! I have to fix this typo...

jvidal, on 14 March 2012 - 08:19 PM, said:

I found another typo. The script expects version 4.5.6000 of MRT instead of 4.6.6000...

also thx for this!!!

jvidal, on 14 March 2012 - 08:19 PM, said:

BTW, it is also flagging my WindowsXP-KB2681116-X86-ESN.exe as unknown

Even after fixing the typo (adding a dot between !lang! and exe)?

Mimo

[dziubek]

and by the way

Update for Microsoft Office Outlook 2003 Junk Email Filter (March 2012)

KB974771 replace KB2597968

[Mim0]

new file-checker extension for XP:

2012-03-15
- Fixed: version number of MSRT
- fixed: filename of KB2681116

Download: HFSLIPFC v.2011/11/16 with WindowsXP-update-list v.2012/03/15

dziubek, on 15 March 2012 - 07:51 AM, said:

Update for Microsoft Office Outlook 2003 Junk Email Filter (March 2012)

KB974771 replace KB2597968

Thx!

[dziubek]

dump

This post has been edited by dziubek: 15 March 2012 - 03:53 PM

[jvidal]

thx again, mimo!

[jvidal]

dziubek, on 15 March 2012 - 07:51 AM, said:

and by the way

Update for Microsoft Office Outlook 2003 Junk Email Filter (March 2012)

KB974771 replace KB2597968

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

KB2598246 replaces the previous junk filter. The one you posted is from 2009!

this is the right link: http://www.microsoft...s.aspx?id=29184

This post has been edited by jvidal: 16 March 2012 - 12:34 AM

[dziubek]

@jvidal

You're right, sorry. I suggested a link to the source from the majorgeeks:
http://majorgeeks.co...2003_d5412.html
however the link to download the file is correct (Download@Author's Site)

edit:
Guys changed the link after my @

This post has been edited by dziubek: 16 March 2012 - 07:35 AM

[jvidal]

never trust the junk email filter link on MG, it's almost always wrong.

[rulman]

@Mim0 ;

KB2681116 replaced KB2657025

?

[Mim0]

Hi rulman

rulman, on 17 March 2012 - 03:03 AM, said:

KB2681116 replaced KB2657025

Yes, I wrote it in the change-log and also in the update-list.

Currently there are three active time-zone-updates on the list. The reason ist that KB2681116 is 'just' a hotfix, KB2657025 is optional and only KB2633952 is a high-priority update. I wrote hints to all of these updates.

And also the file-checker knows that:
KB2681116 replaces KB2657025 and KB2633952
KB2657025 replaces KB2633952

[jvidal]

Actually, you only need 2681116.

[Mim0]

jvidal, on 17 March 2012 - 10:24 AM, said:

Actually, you only need 2681116.

Sure, but probably someone won't hotfixes (which are not testet as far as other updates). For that reason the file-checker has the corresponding options in the INI. And for this, I have all three updates (with the hints) on the list.

[jvidal]

Sorry, mimo, but I didn't understand a word you wrote.
I know the script supports the three, but in reality, a user would be OK with just 2681116.

[bristols]

jvidal, on 18 March 2012 - 01:45 PM, said:

Sorry, mimo, but I didn't understand a word you wrote.
I know the script supports the three, but in reality, a user would be OK with just 2681116.

Without wanting to put words into Mim0's mouth, I think he means that:

1. he retains 2657025 in his list for those who don't install hotfixes (as opposed to updates that are generally available, e.g. the ones you don't have to request).
2. he retains 2633952 in his list in deference to Microsoft, who categorises it as a high-priority update (whereas Microsoft calls 2657025 only "optional").

It's true that 2681116 replaces them both. But not everyone will install hotfixes. Microsoft does not test hotfixes (that you have to request) as thoroughly as it tests other updates. On some systems/configurations, some hotfixes have been reported to cause problems. One or two members here don't have a good word to say about them. Having said that, my own experience with hotfixes has been almost entirely trouble-free.

This post has been edited by bristols: 18 March 2012 - 02:18 PM

[tomasz86]

HBRs are generally OK. If you look at Service Packs you can see that they are mostly combined of such hotfixes. Especially this one (2681116) is just a registry change so there's very little possiblity of being buggy (which can be the case if there're some untested .dlls, etc.).