RT Seven Lite - RC build 1.7.0 and Beta build 2.6.0 Windows 7 Configuration tool (07-12-2010) - SP1 Slipstream supported
#181
Posted 28 March 2010 - 07:14 PM
only problem when removing music samples & pics it left the folders other then that im very pleased
#182
Posted 29 March 2010 - 12:10 AM
nitropuppy
#183
Posted 29 March 2010 - 01:42 AM
#184
Posted 29 March 2010 - 03:47 PM

If i press OK the integration goes forced done but the ISO created and tested on virtualbox give error on the finish istall the SysOp updated and do not work.

I use seven x64 HomePremium.
Bye
This post has been edited by Zumoc: 29 March 2010 - 04:14 PM
#185
Posted 29 March 2010 - 05:01 PM
the pending.xml in winsxs dir need to remove
but its need to be applied first
same files from winsxs is missing that why cant be applied
i think
This post has been edited by aviv00: 29 March 2010 - 05:02 PM
#186
Posted 29 March 2010 - 07:15 PM
aviv00, on 29 March 2010 - 05:01 PM, said:
the pending.xml in winsxs dir need to remove
but its need to be applied first
same files from winsxs is missing that why cant be applied
i think
Hi,
so i update the SyOP but delete the xml file before the createion of the iso
OR
i copy the original SysOP in the loca folder ,delete the xmlfile , apply the update and create the ISO?
#187
Posted 29 March 2010 - 07:52 PM
here a guide
http://www.msfn.org/...val-with-vlite/
but i duno if its the same problem
This post has been edited by aviv00: 29 March 2010 - 07:52 PM
#189
Posted 30 March 2010 - 12:52 AM
Zumoc, on 29 March 2010 - 03:47 PM, said:
If i press OK the integration goes forced done but the ISO created and tested on virtualbox give error on the finish istall the SysOp updated and do not work.
I use seven x64 HomePremium.
Bye
These errors will be fixed in next build which will be available within this week
#190
Posted 30 March 2010 - 07:50 AM
does this program work on win 7 enterprise x86, and are there any others that do?
thank you
michael
since i posted this i found 2 post, one on the 8th stating "no it doesn't work on enterprise" from "w..." and one the day before from "bensam" stating he was using rt7lite
on enterprise or with enterprise, i'm not clear on that. so,
This post has been edited by mchldpy: 30 March 2010 - 08:08 AM
#191
Posted 30 March 2010 - 10:10 AM
bensam56, on 30 March 2010 - 12:52 AM, said:
Zumoc, on 29 March 2010 - 03:47 PM, said:
If i press OK the integration goes forced done but the ISO created and tested on virtualbox give error on the finish istall the SysOp updated and do not work.
I use seven x64 HomePremium.
Bye
These errors will be fixed in next build which will be available within this week
ok thank's
#192
Posted 30 March 2010 - 11:28 PM
#193
Posted 31 March 2010 - 02:05 AM
#194
Posted 31 March 2010 - 04:18 AM
u think u goes to support windows server 2008 r2 too ? even in far future ?
#195
Posted 31 March 2010 - 06:55 AM
aviv00, on 31 March 2010 - 04:18 AM, said:
u think u goes to support windows server 2008 r2 too ? even in far future ?
Yes, definitely would be nice in the future, many of us who spend $300 or more on TechNet each year need a way to reduce the size of our VM's. My guess is Bensam added a software limitation so that 7Lite would only work with 7, which means it shouldn't be too hard for him to allow R2 as well. In operation they are gonna be 99% similar (DISM-wise), so even at this stage I would imagine most of the bugs are worked out.
7Lite has come along way in the past month, so it might be stable enough now to start testing it with R2.
#196
Posted 31 March 2010 - 01:09 PM
Or even make a section in your program to add files to the image that create the $OEM$ directory to add custom scripts or files.
I would like to create a dir c:\install\tools with bginfo in there, and c:\install\scripts with some vb scripts that can run during or after install.
Thanks for the tool.
#197
Posted 01 April 2010 - 08:12 AM
#198
Posted 02 April 2010 - 10:41 AM
it's good that someone follows Nuhi's work. It seems 7Lite is "file based" but I think since Vista is better slimming solution based on assemblies. They have manifest file with information about name, processor architecture, dependencies etc. Btw exists somewhere binding between Windows Features and corresponding files/assemblies?
To Ben: I disassembled your application and you really should separate business logic and presentation logic... no offense.
Best regard,
Michal Pavlik
#199
Posted 02 April 2010 - 12:07 PM
johnhc, on 01 April 2010 - 08:12 AM, said:
its based on dism. So as per Microsoft said I mentioned up ther. Removing components and other tweaks process can be done under XP. Next build i'm not gonna use dism.
#200
Posted 02 April 2010 - 12:30 PM
- ← Req. suggestion for method for customized win7 inst.
- Unattended Windows 7/Server 2008R2
- Customize Automated Install →



Help
Back to top









