Jump to content

Welcome to MSFN Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account



Photo

does anyone still use winamp 2.9* from


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

Poll: Does anyone still use winamp 2.9* (26 member(s) have cast votes)

Does anyone still use winamp 2.9*

  1. Yes (5 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  2. No (19 votes [76.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 76.00%

  3. Win What? (1 votes [4.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1
XtremeMaC

XtremeMaC

    MSFN SuperB

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,070 posts
  • Joined 13-October 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
ehe I'm asking this bc
I'm currently hosting
winamp 5 and 2.91
winamp 5 superseeeds 2.91 so I didn't see any point in leaving it there
if no one wants it I want to delete the 2.91 installer...

(sorry for this stupid poll, but I don't want ppl trying to dl it and not be able to find it on the server, I also know its 2.224mb but still takes up space since its not unlimited)

Thanks...




How to remove advertisement from MSFN

#2
R600

R600

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 219 posts
  • Joined 07-August 03
Haven't tried winamp 5, but I hated upgrading to winamp 2.8 from 2.6i think. It didn't function the way I liked prior to the upgrade. Same goes for when I upgraded from 2.9 to 3.0.
I had to revert back to 2.9 because it worked much better than any of the other ones available.
Main Comp
CPU: AMD AthlonXP 2100+ | Mobo: Gigabyte GA-7VRX | RAM: 768MB DDR PC2700 | HDD: 80GB IBM Deskstar | GFX: Inno3D GF4 Ti4200 128MB | Audio: Creative Audigy Platinum Ex | Speakers: Creative Inspire 5500
Windows XP Pro

#3
diesel_98a

diesel_98a

    Spurz 4 Life....

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 532 posts
  • Joined 26-July 03
i like winamp 5 the best. i have even stopped using wmp9 & musicmatch 8 for it.

i am going to download the .msi installer for winamp5. will save me 1.5mb from using Installrite to copy it.

Edited by diesel_98a, 28 January 2004 - 07:33 PM.


#4
XtremeMaC

XtremeMaC

    MSFN SuperB

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,070 posts
  • Joined 13-October 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
r600
winamp 5 is nothing like winamp 3, I hated winamp 3!. and all the functions of it. therefore I used 2.95, now I'm on 5 it rocks.
I use it on standard skin, more usefull for me.



#5
Tarun

Tarun

    Spectre

  • Super Moderator
  • 3,190 posts
  • Joined 27-January 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
I used 2.95 for a while, and have considered going back. The Desktop Milkdrop effect has kept me though. I have a strange screech that happened with Winamp5 and not with 2.95. Don't rightly know why. I remember hearing about 2.95 and that it wasn't a real release. The last release was 2.91. 2.95 had some cd ripping/burning features (which are found in Winamp5 and work nicely) So I also use WA5.01 to rip my mp3s, instead of CdEx Beta, which was very good as well for mp3 ripping.

#6
XtremeMaC

XtremeMaC

    MSFN SuperB

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,070 posts
  • Joined 13-October 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
result = winamp 2.95 removed from my website...



#7
techguy21801

techguy21801

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 560 posts
  • Joined 16-December 02
actually i still prefer v. 2.76, for some reason i just don't like the 2.9 series, they have a fading effect when songs are switched, and it's real annoying
I don't suffer from Insanity...I enjoy every minute of it.

#8
prathapml

prathapml

    Follow the rules please :-)

  • Patrons
  • 6,791 posts
  • Joined 14-November 03
  • OS:Windows 8 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
yeah...... do take the 2.9 series down.
I'm on the latest version always - when all my friends were bitching about wa3, I was still comfortably using it on a cyrix-MII+32MB RAM.

Currently my new comp is on v5.02.
BTW, 2.95 is a leaked version and nobody's (on the right side of the law) allowed to have/distribute it.
Posted ImageCheers !!!   Donate to MSFN and Help Keep This Site Running
||Please Read the Forum Rules||  Etiquette   || Welcome to MSFN - Forum Basics || Before posting
prathapml :: MSFN Supermod :: Private Message me if you ever have a problem while at MSFN

#9
techguy21801

techguy21801

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 560 posts
  • Joined 16-December 02
is ver. 5 any good?
I don't suffer from Insanity...I enjoy every minute of it.

#10
WildKat

WildKat

    Life No'9

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 242 posts
  • Joined 20-April 03
yea its good, its got the usability of 2.x and the looks of 3
all round goodness :)
--> Wild-Kat <--

#11
Doggie

Doggie

    I'm very inactive :(

  • Patrons
  • 2,676 posts
  • Joined 13-October 02
nope.. i dont use any at all.. i actually prefer WMP :)

#12
Carmon

Carmon

    MSFN's Local Mental Case

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,598 posts
  • Joined 08-June 03
I use to use 2.x on my 400mhz Win98 PC cuz it was quick N easy but now i just use WM9 on my 1.1ghz
Posted Image

#13
prathapml

prathapml

    Follow the rules please :-)

  • Patrons
  • 6,791 posts
  • Joined 14-November 03
  • OS:Windows 8 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

I use to use 2.x on my 400mhz Win98 PC cuz it was quick N easy but now i just use WM9 on my 1.1ghz

hey, wa5 (when used with the classic skin) should run decently on that.


is ver. 5 any good?

I hope you don't really mean it - don't even dare ask such a Q when I'm around :)
Posted ImageCheers !!!   Donate to MSFN and Help Keep This Site Running
||Please Read the Forum Rules||  Etiquette   || Welcome to MSFN - Forum Basics || Before posting
prathapml :: MSFN Supermod :: Private Message me if you ever have a problem while at MSFN




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users