MSFN Forum: does anyone still use winamp 2.9* from - MSFN Forum

Jump to content


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

does anyone still use winamp 2.9* from also alanoll's unattended msi

Poll: Does anyone still use winamp 2.9* (26 member(s) have cast votes)

Does anyone still use winamp 2.9*

  1. Yes (5 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  2. No (19 votes [76.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 76.00%

  3. Win What? (1 votes [4.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   XtremeMaC 

  • MSFN SuperB
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Joined: 13-October 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 28 January 2004 - 07:09 PM

ehe I'm asking this bc
I'm currently hosting
winamp 5 and 2.91
winamp 5 superseeeds 2.91 so I didn't see any point in leaving it there
if no one wants it I want to delete the 2.91 installer...

(sorry for this stupid poll, but I don't want ppl trying to dl it and not be able to find it on the server, I also know its 2.224mb but still takes up space since its not unlimited)

Thanks...

#2 User is offline   R600 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 219
  • Joined: 07-August 03

Posted 28 January 2004 - 07:14 PM

Haven't tried winamp 5, but I hated upgrading to winamp 2.8 from 2.6i think. It didn't function the way I liked prior to the upgrade. Same goes for when I upgraded from 2.9 to 3.0.
I had to revert back to 2.9 because it worked much better than any of the other ones available.

#3 User is offline   diesel_98a 

  • Spurz 4 Life....
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 532
  • Joined: 26-July 03

Posted 28 January 2004 - 07:27 PM

i like winamp 5 the best. i have even stopped using wmp9 & musicmatch 8 for it.

i am going to download the .msi installer for winamp5. will save me 1.5mb from using Installrite to copy it.

This post has been edited by diesel_98a: 28 January 2004 - 07:33 PM

#4 User is offline   XtremeMaC 

  • MSFN SuperB
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Joined: 13-October 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 28 January 2004 - 08:15 PM

r600
winamp 5 is nothing like winamp 3, I hated winamp 3!. and all the functions of it. therefore I used 2.95, now I'm on 5 it rocks.
I use it on standard skin, more usefull for me.

#5 User is offline   Tarun 

  • Area 5 Investigator
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 3,080
  • Joined: 27-January 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 29 January 2004 - 09:16 PM

I used 2.95 for a while, and have considered going back. The Desktop Milkdrop effect has kept me though. I have a strange screech that happened with Winamp5 and not with 2.95. Don't rightly know why. I remember hearing about 2.95 and that it wasn't a real release. The last release was 2.91. 2.95 had some cd ripping/burning features (which are found in Winamp5 and work nicely) So I also use WA5.01 to rip my mp3s, instead of CdEx Beta, which was very good as well for mp3 ripping.

#6 User is offline   XtremeMaC 

  • MSFN SuperB
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Joined: 13-October 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 05 February 2004 - 01:57 AM

result = winamp 2.95 removed from my website...

#7 User is offline   techguy21801 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 560
  • Joined: 16-December 02

Posted 13 February 2004 - 09:52 AM

actually i still prefer v. 2.76, for some reason i just don't like the 2.9 series, they have a fading effect when songs are switched, and it's real annoying

#8 User is offline   prathapml 

  • Follow the rules please :-)
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 6,791
  • Joined: 14-November 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 13 February 2004 - 10:14 AM

yeah...... do take the 2.9 series down.
I'm on the latest version always - when all my friends were bitching about wa3, I was still comfortably using it on a cyrix-MII+32MB RAM.

Currently my new comp is on v5.02.
BTW, 2.95 is a leaked version and nobody's (on the right side of the law) allowed to have/distribute it.

#9 User is offline   techguy21801 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 560
  • Joined: 16-December 02

Posted 13 February 2004 - 11:50 AM

is ver. 5 any good?

#10 User is offline   WildKat 

  • Life No'9
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: 20-April 03

Posted 13 February 2004 - 12:24 PM

yea its good, its got the usability of 2.x and the looks of 3
all round goodness :)

#11 User is offline   Doggie 

  • I'm very inactive :(
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 2,676
  • Joined: 13-October 02

Posted 14 February 2004 - 02:39 AM

nope.. i dont use any at all.. i actually prefer WMP :)

#12 User is offline   Carmon 

  • MSFN's Local Mental Case
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,598
  • Joined: 08-June 03

Posted 14 February 2004 - 04:00 AM

I use to use 2.x on my 400mhz Win98 PC cuz it was quick N easy but now i just use WM9 on my 1.1ghz

#13 User is offline   prathapml 

  • Follow the rules please :-)
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 6,791
  • Joined: 14-November 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 14 February 2004 - 11:46 AM

Widnez_boy, on Feb 14 2004, 03:30 PM, said:

I use to use 2.x on my 400mhz Win98 PC cuz it was quick N easy but now i just use WM9 on my 1.1ghz

hey, wa5 (when used with the classic skin) should run decently on that.


Quote

is ver. 5 any good?
I hope you don't really mean it - don't even dare ask such a Q when I'm around :)

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2013 msfn.org
Privacy Policy