MSFN Forum: HFSLIPFC-2K - MSFN Forum

Jump to content


  • 5 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

HFSLIPFC-2K HFSLIP File Checker extension for Windows 2000 users (v. 2012-02-19) Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Parseus 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 03-October 09
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 17 April 2010 - 07:16 AM

HFSLIPFC-2K (HFSLIP File Checker 2K) is an extension for Windows 2000 users for HFSLIP File Checker. It's based on list maintained now by bristols.

HFSLIPFC-2K

Changelog:

Spoiler

This post has been edited by Parseus: 19 February 2012 - 07:18 AM



#2 User is offline   stephan_bauer 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 33
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 18 April 2010 - 05:32 AM

Hello Parseus,

thank you for the script.

This is what I found:
- There is a version 2 of KB975002: Windows2000-WindowsMedia-KB975025-v2-x86-DEU.exe
- WindowsRightsManagementServices has a strange language naming. For German:WindowsRightsManagementServicesSP2-KB917275-Client-GER-x86.exe
This is already solved in the original hfslipfc.cmd
- Old versions of kb890830 are not included. Found in hfslipfc.cmd
R|HF\windows-kb890830-v3.0.exe|Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.0, replaced by v3.1
R|HF\windows-kb890830-v3.1.exe|Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.1, replaced by v3.2
R|HF\windows-kb890830-v3.2.exe|Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.2, replaced bei v3.3
R|HF\windows-kb890830-v3.3.exe|Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.3, replaced bei v3.4
R|HF\windows-kb890830-v3.4.exe|Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.4, replaced bei v3.5
- IE install file HFCABS\SCRIPTGER.CAB is called SCRIPTDE.CAB in German

Regards

Stephan

This post has been edited by stephan_bauer: 18 April 2010 - 06:23 AM


#3 User is offline   stephan_bauer 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 33
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 18 April 2010 - 05:47 AM

There are no language versions of WindowsMedia9-KB891122-x86-Global-ENU.exe

windows-kb890830-v3.6.exe missing

#4 User is offline   stephan_bauer 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 33
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 18 April 2010 - 06:00 AM

There is a version 2 of KB911280: Windows2000-KB911280-v2-x86-DEU.EXE
There is a version 2 of KB961371: Windows2000-KB961371-V2-x86-DEU.EXE

OE6.0sp1-KB973354-Windows2000-x86-ENU.exe missing
repaces OE6.0sp1-KB951066-Windows2000-x86-ENU.exe

There are these two entries:
R|HF\Windows2000-KB941644-x86-!lang!.EXE|MS08-001: TCP/IP, replaced by KB953230
R|HF\Windows2000-KB945553-x86-!lang!.EXE|MS08-020: DNS Client, replaced by KB953230
but no KB953230

#5 User is offline   Parseus 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 03-October 09
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 18 April 2010 - 08:07 AM

Thanks for all, stephan_bauer. I updated the first post and a link to HFSLIPFC 2K.

#6 User is offline   stephan_bauer 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 33
  • Joined: 01-August 07

Posted 18 April 2010 - 11:07 AM

Windows2000-KB977816-x86-DEU.EXE is called Windows2000-WindowsMedia-KB977816-x86-DEU.exe
windows-kb890830-v3.6.exe still missing
windows-kb890830-v3.5.exe obsolete

WindowsRightsManagementServices not fixed you need the code from hfslipfc.cmd "Getting lang2 and ln979099 from lang"

To my knowlegde this rootupd.exe is the lastest working with w2k:
http://www.download....658a4f6d589.exe
found at http://users.telenet...nup/_win2k.html

This update is also at the list of http://www.vorck.com...fixes_2000.html
Windows2000-KB924667-x86-ENU.EXE

#7 User is offline   Parseus 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 03-October 09
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 19 April 2010 - 12:47 PM

Thanks again :-) First post updated.

#8 User is offline   jvidal 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 652
  • Joined: 14-November 05

Posted 22 April 2010 - 11:32 AM

anyone willing to make a version suitable for 2k3 and another for XP x64???

it would be greatly appreciated!

bye!

#9 User is offline   Parseus 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 03-October 09
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 22 April 2010 - 03:19 PM

View Postjvidal, on 22 April 2010 - 11:32 AM, said:

anyone willing to make a version suitable for 2k3 and another for XP x64???

it would be greatly appreciated!

bye!


I'm not making a promise, but I'll think about that ;)

#10 User is offline   bphlpt 

  • MSFN Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,081
  • Joined: 12-May 07

Posted 23 April 2010 - 02:33 PM

If we end up having one for XP, 2K, 2K3, and XP64 - not knowing anything at all about the inner workings, but does it make any sense at all to combine them in some way? It just seems to me that by having one program to update rather than multiple versions there would be less to update, easier to keep in sync, less likely an error would creep into one version and not another, etc, etc. And of course my argument would then be to include it as a part of HFSLIP itself. But that's just my two cents. I've always thought that functions so closely related should be combined, but I know others think it's better to keep each function separate. Different programming styles I guess.

Cheers and Regards

#11 User is offline   My2GirlsDad 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 97
  • Joined: 28-December 08
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 23 April 2010 - 09:50 PM

Firstly, thank you for creating this program for Win2k. I've been using Mimo's XP Checker since it inception and both of these programs help greatly to keep track of our update lists.

I would like to point out a couple of problems I have found.


unknown: HF\Windows2000-KB981349-x86-ENU.EXE
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB981350-x86-ENU.EXE (MS10-022: VBScript (update from 5.1 to 5.6 version))


KB981349 updates VBSCRIPT from version 5.1 to 5.7. On these updates it would be either but not both. Maybe you need an entry in the INI file whether user wants version 5.6 or version 5.7. Something to think about.


missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB917537-x86-ENU.EXE (MS06-034: Internet Information Services (IIS))
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB926121-x86-ENU.EXE (MS06-077: Remote Installation Services)
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB926247-x86-ENU.EXE (MS06-074: SNMP)
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB942831-x86-ENU.EXE (MS08-005: Internet Information Services (IIS))
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB953155-x86-ENU.EXE (MS08-062: Internet Printing Service)
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB957097-x86-ENU.EXE (MS08-068: SMB)
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB976323-x86-ENU.EXE (MS10-024: SMTP Service
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB977290-x86-ENU.EXE (MS10-014: Kerberos)
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-WindowsMedia-KB975025-v2-x86-ENU.exe (MS09-051: Audio Compression Manager)
missing (S): HF\WindowsMedia9-KB969878-x86-ENU.exe (MS09-051: WMA Voice Codec)


You have all the updates tagged as High-Priority, but I believe they should be marked as Optional as Windows/Microsoft Updates does not ask for any of them. Am I correct?


unknown: HFCABS\_IE6_HFSLIP.CAB
unknown: HFCABS\_IE6b_HFSLIP.CAB
unknown: HFCABS\_OE6_HFSLIP.CAB


These files are created the first time you run HFSLIP. Should they be included in your list?


Found unexpected version of Roots Certificates (HF\rootsupd.exe)

While you have the version correct, 22.0.2195.0 SEP 2009, the size you have is incorrect. The size should be 239000.



Thank again for all your efforts

M2GD

This post has been edited by My2GirlsDad: 25 April 2010 - 06:51 AM


#12 User is offline   Mim0 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 705
  • Joined: 23-September 08

Posted 25 April 2010 - 04:30 AM

View Postbphlpt, on 23 April 2010 - 02:33 PM, said:

If we end up having one for XP, 2K, 2K3, and XP64 - not knowing anything at all about the inner workings, but does it make any sense at all to combine them in some way? It just seems to me that by having one program to update rather than multiple versions there would be less to update, easier to keep in sync, less likely an error would creep into one version and not another, etc, etc. And of course my argument would then be to include it as a part of HFSLIP itself. But that's just my two cents. I've always thought that functions so closely related should be combined, but I know others think it's better to keep each function separate. Different programming styles I guess.

Cheers and Regards


That's possible. The FC can use any update-list, not just the internal which is for XPSP3. Currently it can be configured in the INI - no automatism.
I've compared Parseus changes and there is a little bit to do because W2K has a few other sections than XP. But the changes are minimal.

Just an idea for a first step:
- I include Parseus changes, Parseus offers a current update-list for W2K.
- I make an OS-detection of the SOURCE-folder to take the correct update-list automatically.

Second step:
- I extend the automatic update to download not just the current version of the FC, but also the update-list(s)

Third step:
- Support other OSs

If Parseus like to to that... ;)

This post has been edited by Mim0: 25 April 2010 - 04:30 AM


#13 User is offline   tommyp 

  • MSFN Addict
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,675
  • Joined: 09-January 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 25 April 2010 - 05:19 AM

MG2D - If your winnt.sif file has IIS or whatever optional stuff installed, then WU will prompt for an update. If it's not installed, then WU won't ask for it. However, if the iso is all up to snuff and you installed some other optional windows component later on, the latest binary will be ready to go.

#14 User is offline   Mim0 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 705
  • Joined: 23-September 08

Posted 25 April 2010 - 10:57 PM

View PostMy2GirlsDad, on 23 April 2010 - 09:50 PM, said:

unknown: HF\Windows2000-KB981349-x86-ENU.EXE
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB981350-x86-ENU.EXE (MS10-022: VBScript (update from 5.1 to 5.6 version))


KB981349 updates VBSCRIPT from version 5.1 to 5.7. On these updates it would be either but not both. Maybe you need an entry in the INI file whether user wants version 5.6 or version 5.7. Something to think about.
INI-entry is not necessary. Security-Updates (MS...) are mandatory. But Parseus can define a dependency-check in the update-tables in that way that KB981350 will not shown as missing when KB981349 is existing. And even more: KB981350 will be shown as obsolete if KB981349 was found. :)

View PostMy2GirlsDad, on 23 April 2010 - 09:50 PM, said:

...
You have all the updates tagged as High-Priority, but I believe they should be marked as Optional as Windows/Microsoft Updates does not ask for any of them. Am I correct?
MS... are always mandatory. As tommy already said, it's good to have the latest binaries on your cd even if you don't install them.

View PostMy2GirlsDad, on 23 April 2010 - 09:50 PM, said:

...
These files are created the first time you run HFSLIP. Should they be included in your list?
I thought that hfslip always deletes files which are created by hfslip (regarding the folders HF, CABS, ...). For that, Parseus has to define an IGNORE-section containing these files. :)

CU...

This post has been edited by Mim0: 25 April 2010 - 10:58 PM


#15 User is offline   Parseus 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 03-October 09
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 25 April 2010 - 11:16 PM

New version released.

View PostMim0, on 25 April 2010 - 04:30 AM, said:

That's possible. The FC can use any update-list, not just the internal which is for XPSP3. Currently it can be configured in the INI - no automatism.
I've compared Parseus changes and there is a little bit to do because W2K has a few other sections than XP. But the changes are minimal.

Just an idea for a first step:
- I include Parseus changes, Parseus offers a current update-list for W2K.
- I make an OS-detection of the SOURCE-folder to take the correct update-list automatically.

Second step:
- I extend the automatic update to download not just the current version of the FC, but also the update-list(s)

Third step:
- Support other OSs

If Parseus like to to that... ;)


Sure, no problem ;) HFSLIPFC 2K has been already prepared for automatic update BTW. I think both HFSLIP FC's could be released as one f.e. after the May updates, but I also think it couldn't be any problem for releasing it earlier :)

#16 User is offline   Mim0 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 705
  • Joined: 23-September 08

Posted 25 April 2010 - 11:42 PM

View PostParseus, on 25 April 2010 - 11:16 PM, said:

...HFSLIPFC 2K has been already prepared for automatic update BTW
Yes, but I mean to split the automatic update in two parts: the fc itself and the update lists. ;)

View PostParseus, on 25 April 2010 - 11:16 PM, said:

I think both HFSLIP FC's could be released as one f.e. after the May updates, but I also think it couldn't be any problem for releasing it earlier :)
OK, that was the start! :)

#17 User is offline   tommyp 

  • MSFN Addict
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 1,675
  • Joined: 09-January 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 26 April 2010 - 03:38 AM

Maybe I can interject a dumb idea. Perhaps have a total of 3 files. One file can be the FC "engine" and the other two files are the look up tables. Maybe automate the table downloading from the fc engine too. I'm not sure how to do all that stuff though.

#18 User is offline   Mim0 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 705
  • Joined: 23-September 08

Posted 26 April 2010 - 03:59 AM

View Posttommyp, on 26 April 2010 - 03:38 AM, said:

Maybe I can interject a dumb idea. Perhaps have a total of 3 files. One file can be the FC "engine" and the other two files are the look up tables.
That's what I want to say in my postings above :)

View Posttommyp, on 26 April 2010 - 03:38 AM, said:

Maybe automate the table downloading from the fc engine too.
Of course, no prob:

View PostMim0, on 25 April 2010 - 04:30 AM, said:

...
Second step:
- I extend the automatic update to download not just the current version of the FC, but also the update-list(s)
...

But all files must be hosted on a web/ftp-server with direct access for WGET (instead of a file-hoster like mediafire, rapidshare...). My files are on a "normal" web-server, probably Parseus can find also a way for the W2K-list... ;)

This post has been edited by Mim0: 26 April 2010 - 04:02 AM


#19 User is offline   bphlpt 

  • MSFN Expert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,081
  • Joined: 12-May 07

Posted 26 April 2010 - 06:09 AM

View PostMim0, on 26 April 2010 - 03:59 AM, said:

But all files must be hosted on a web/ftp-server with direct access for WGET


Not trying to be presumptuous, but if a stable home is needed for these files, would it be at all possible for them to be hosted either with the other HFSLIP files, or with fdv's files, or here on MSFN? As I have said, I always like the idea of related things being kept together. Of course if either space or bandwidth is an issue I totally understand. Just my two cents.

Cheers and Regards

#20 User is offline   Mim0 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 705
  • Joined: 23-September 08

Posted 26 April 2010 - 06:25 AM

View Postbphlpt, on 26 April 2010 - 06:09 AM, said:

Not trying to be presumptuous, but if a stable home is needed for these files, would it be at all possible for them to be hosted either with the other HFSLIP files, or with fdv's files, or here on MSFN? As I have said, I always like the idea of related things being kept together. Of course if either space or bandwidth is an issue I totally understand.
I think bandwidth is not the prob. An update-list are just a few bytes and there are not a million fc-users :D.

But even if the files are on different servers - the FC will know the URLs for downloading the current lists. There's no need to have them on the same server.

To have them on the same server is more an "organizational problem". I want to access and update my files directly - just in time. I don't like the idea to send someone my files for putting them on a web-server.

This post has been edited by Mim0: 26 April 2010 - 08:11 AM


Share this topic:


  • 5 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2013 msfn.org
Privacy Policy