MSFN Forum: Western Digital WD800JB - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Hard Drive and Removable Media issues Rules

If you have questions about Seagate 7200.11, do read the READ_ME_FIRST, then read the FGA. If your questions remain unanswered after reading those two stickies, then post. For all other Hard Drive and Removable Media issues, you may post right away.
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Western Digital WD800JB Slower than others of same model Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   techtype 

  • * Seeker of Knowledge *
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 275
  • Joined: 18-October 03

Posted 30 January 2004 - 12:39 PM

I have three of these Western Digital WD800JB 8 Meg cache 7200 (Special Edition) drives. I noticed that one of them benchmarks slower than the other two. (43,000 kB/s versus 50,000)This is not a computer or controller issue, as I have tested in different computers. I've been using the drive for 6 months and it works without errors and passes the diagnostics. It makes me wonder though. Should I try to RMA the drive?


#2 User is offline   XtremeMaC 

  • MSFN SuperB
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Joined: 13-October 03

Posted 30 January 2004 - 12:49 PM

if its 43 kB/s u should but if its 43MB/s its okay :)
80 GB Hard Drive WD800JB
Rotational Speed 7,200 RPM (nominal) 
Buffer Size 8 MB 
Buffer To Disk 602.0 Mbits/s (Max) 
Read Seek Time (Average) 8.9 ms 
Write Seek Time (Average) 10.9 ms (average) 
Track-To-Track Seek Time 2.0 ms (average) 
Full Stroke Seek 21.0 ms (average) 
Average Latency 4.2 ms (nominal) 
Mode 5 Ultra ATA 100.0 MB/s
Mode 4 Ultra ATA 66.6 MB/s
Mode 2 Ultra ATA 33.3 MB/s 
Mode 4 PIO 16.6 MB/s 
Mode 2 multi-word DMA 16.6 MB/s

it might have some issues..with this mode's.
also maybe does the slower one have system files on it? or are u testing them blank? also are they on different contollers or did u test them at the same controller, same cable same ide port one at a time?

#3 User is offline   techtype 

  • * Seeker of Knowledge *
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 275
  • Joined: 18-October 03

Posted 30 January 2004 - 03:00 PM

Yeah, I left out a few 0s (edited them in now) (43,000 kB/s versus 50,000)

Same controller, port, cable, etc. It's annoying, but I guess I can live with it.

#4 User is offline   XtremeMaC 

  • MSFN SuperB
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Joined: 13-October 03

Posted 30 January 2004 - 05:45 PM

well if u believe its not working properly rma it
I did it with my western digital 120GB 8MB cache drive.
nothing was reporting wrong but my fat table kept deleting it self (no virus) i sent it back they looked at it and said there is nothing wrong with it. anyways they sent a new one working charm..

(ps. I didn't buy it from western digital I bought it from caloptic.com and returned it to them. after that I dunno what happened.)

#5 User is offline   Aaron 

  • The MSFN Banana
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 5,767
  • Joined: 17-August 01

Posted 30 January 2004 - 08:40 PM

techtype, I have the same issue. a WD 8mb cache 120gb on master and a 200 on slave. Exact same spec, just bigger in capacity and slower on the slave.

Here's a graph:

Posted Image

Bench 1. WD 120GB: 47.0 MB/s
Bench 2. WD 120GB Burst: 70.5 MB/s

Bench 3. WD 200GB: 53.0 MB/s
Bench 4: WD 200GB Burst: 59.0 MB/s

The results are very irregular. Notice how the last bench resulted in a straight line? Looked like it was struggling to do more but something was limiting its speed.

#6 User is offline   techtype 

  • * Seeker of Knowledge *
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 275
  • Joined: 18-October 03

Posted 31 January 2004 - 05:44 AM

What are you benchmarking with? I'm using diskspeed32. I can only speculate that the motors have a wide variance in speed, Im guessing that some like ours don't really hit 7200 rpm.

#7 User is offline   Aaron 

  • The MSFN Banana
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 5,767
  • Joined: 17-August 01

Posted 31 January 2004 - 07:20 AM

I'm using HD_speed from Steelbytes

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy