Version 3.0 is out with some nice features added...
Page 1 of 1
Zone Alarm Pro
#3
Posted 10 March 2002 - 05:17 PM
[quote:f6c87952c8="AaronXP"]
And its crap.
Back to 2.6.362 [/quote:f6c87952c8]
What's wrong/crappy with the new Zone Alarm AaronXP?
And its crap.
Back to 2.6.362 [/quote:f6c87952c8]
What's wrong/crappy with the new Zone Alarm AaronXP?
#4
Posted 10 March 2002 - 05:49 PM
[quote:e84bf4b28f="AaronXP"]
And its crap.
Back to 2.6.362 [/quote:e84bf4b28f]
I have to agree with Aaron to an extent on this one.
Reasons being:
1. ZA 3.0 is very slow at loading up compared to 2.6
2. ZA 3.0 is, on occasion, still losing it's rules for me.
3. ZA 3.0 likes to dissapear off my toolbar when it wishs
Overall though, an excellent update!
Gimie
And its crap.
Back to 2.6.362 [/quote:e84bf4b28f]
I have to agree with Aaron to an extent on this one.
Reasons being:
1. ZA 3.0 is very slow at loading up compared to 2.6
2. ZA 3.0 is, on occasion, still losing it's rules for me.
3. ZA 3.0 likes to dissapear off my toolbar when it wishs
Overall though, an excellent update!
Gimie
#5
Posted 10 March 2002 - 08:06 PM
The reason I don't like it is because it looks a lot bigger, and ZoneLabs have made it harder to find the advanced options.
#6
Posted 10 March 2002 - 08:11 PM
[quote:a46dadd387="AaronXP"]
The reason I don't like it is because it looks a lot bigger, and ZoneLabs have made it harder to find the advanced options. [/quote:a46dadd387]
It's true that to get to advanced options you have to go thru a few more tabs but that's the design of ZA now, not too hard to get use to
Why does it matter how big ZA looks? The main purpose to a firewall is to leave it running in the background/taskbar anyway
Gimie
The reason I don't like it is because it looks a lot bigger, and ZoneLabs have made it harder to find the advanced options. [/quote:a46dadd387]
It's true that to get to advanced options you have to go thru a few more tabs but that's the design of ZA now, not too hard to get use to
Why does it matter how big ZA looks? The main purpose to a firewall is to leave it running in the background/taskbar anyway
Gimie
#7
Posted 11 March 2002 - 11:42 AM
Ive used it for a day or so now and its a pain in the a**....
Gone back to 2.6
Gone back to 2.6
#8
Posted 11 March 2002 - 05:12 PM
[quote:b27fd84b52="BAH"]
Ive used it for a day or so now and its a pain in the a**....
Gone back to 2.6 [/quote:b27fd84b52]
I think it's a step in the right direction personally, but it is drastic new change from 2.6 and was brought on too harshly.
I look forward to the next version of ZA, they nearly have it!
Gimie
Ive used it for a day or so now and its a pain in the a**....
Gone back to 2.6 [/quote:b27fd84b52]
I think it's a step in the right direction personally, but it is drastic new change from 2.6 and was brought on too harshly.
I look forward to the next version of ZA, they nearly have it!
Gimie
#9
Posted 12 March 2002 - 06:40 AM
ZA has never worked on XP for me and I think it just totally sux all around! I will get it when people tell me that they are no longer having probs with it.
Rick:cool:
Rick:cool:
#10
Posted 12 March 2002 - 12:40 PM
News Source:
http://www.warp2search.net/article.php?sid...=thread&order=0
Direct Download Link:
http://zonelabs.topdownloads.com/pub/bws/b...apSetup3026.exe
Ooooo new silent update!
Wonder what's new that's acturally useful apart from ad blocking fix?, probably nothing, but checking it out never the less
Gimie
http://www.warp2search.net/article.php?sid...=thread&order=0
Direct Download Link:
http://zonelabs.topdownloads.com/pub/bws/b...apSetup3026.exe
Ooooo new silent update!
Wonder what's new that's acturally useful apart from ad blocking fix?, probably nothing, but checking it out never the less
Gimie
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1



Help
Back to top









