• Announcements

    • xper

      MSFN Sponsorship and AdBlockers!   07/10/2016

      Dear members, MSFN is made available via subscriptions, donations and advertising revenue. The use of ad-blocking software hurts the site. Please disable ad-blocking software or set an exception for MSFN. Alternatively, become a site sponsor and ads will be disabled automatically and by subscribing you get other sponsor benefits.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MagicAndre1981

WEI Random Read score

18 posts in this topic

My Score is 4.7:

WEI_Windows7Score.png

But the confusing part is the HDD score. I have a Samsung F3 1T, but get a score 7.4 :blink:

How can this be?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But the confusing part is the HDD score. I have a Samsung F3 1T, but get a score 7.4 :blink:

How can this be?

I had that too, the AMD ACHI drivers are fooling windows 7 ;). I see now after some updates that it's back to 5.9.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

which AHCI driver do you use? Can you post a link?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just the latest AMD driver version 1.2.0.125, I got it from the Gigabyte site but it should be the same from AMD directly.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm using the same driver.

Here is the output from the XML:


<AvgThroughput kind="Sequential Read" units="MB/s" ioSize="65536" score="7.0">135.57187</AvgThroughput>
<AvgThroughput kind="Random Read" units="MB/s" ioSize="16384" score="7.9">2426.07007</AvgThroughput>
<Responsiveness Kind="AverageIORate" units="ms/IO" score="5.3" factor="0.0">5.38000</Responsiveness>
<Responsiveness Kind="GroupedIOs" units="units" score="6.4" factor="0.0">13.52123</Responsiveness>
<Responsiveness Kind="LongIOs" units="units" score="5.8" factor="0.0">22.39657</Responsiveness>
<Responsiveness Kind="Overall" units="units" score="5.9" factor="0.0">302.82925</Responsiveness>

Look at the random Read value :blink:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what's happening there - what is the specific drive / model # / serial # and what is the specific motherboard chipset, driver version, and connection type (assuming SATA)?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Samsung SpinPoint F3 1000GB, SATA II (3Gb/s) (HD103SJ) used as AHCI. My mainboard has an AMD SB710 southbridge.

I've installed the latest AMD AiO driver.

AMD_SATA_driver.png

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm - honestly not sure unless Samsung has updated the drive FW to specifically score high in Winsat - can you paste the screen output and provide a log file from running winstat disk -v -log <path and filename of logfile>.log? I doubt it's the AMD controller in this case, but...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't upload the log.

So I've placed it on my SkyDrive:

// see next post.

Edited by MagicAndre1981
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the screen output? The log doesn't capture all of it...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
> Disk Random 16.0 Read 3.15 MB/s 4.7

That's about right, so, what did you do to get this output now? I think it was some crazy buffering in RAM.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I run the WinSAT tool again and now get this strange value again:

> WinSAT is Official : Yes

> Laufzeit 00:00:00.00

> Wird ausgefhrt: Speicherbewertung '-seq -read -n 0'

> Laufzeit 00:00:11.00

> Wird ausgefhrt: Speicherbewertung '-ran -read -n 0'

> Laufzeit 00:00:20.16

> Wird ausgefhrt: Speicherbewertung '-scen 2009 -drive C:'

> Laufzeit 00:01:16.26

> Wird ausgefhrt: Speicherbewertung '-seq -write -drive C:'

> Laufzeit 00:00:06.98

> Wird ausgefhrt: Speicherbewertung '-flush -drive C: -seq'

> Laufzeit 00:00:04.51

> Wird ausgefhrt: Speicherbewertung '-flush -drive C: -ran'

> Laufzeit 00:00:08.97

> Wird ausgefhrt: Speicherbewertung '-hybrid -ran -read -n 0 -ransize 4096'

> Laufzeit 00:00:00.20

> Wird ausgefhrt: Speicherbewertung '-hybrid -ran -read -n 0 -ransize 16384'

> Laufzeit 00:00:00.02

> Disk Sequential 64.0 Read 133.42 MB/s 7.0

> Disk Random 16.0 Read 2409.10 MB/s 7.9

> Responsiveness: Average IO Rate 3.38 ms/IO 6.1

> Responsiveness: Grouped IOs 10.84 units 7.0

> Responsiveness: Long IOs 13.89 units 7.1

> Responsiveness: Overall 150.53 units 6.6

> Responsiveness: PenaltyFactor 0.0

> Disk Sequential 64.0 Write 211.06 MB/s 7.3

> Durchschnittliche Lesezeit mit sequenziellen Schreibvorg„ngen4.293 ms 6.2

> Latenz: 95. Perzentil 16.012 ms 4.9

> Latenz: Maximum 308.790 ms 6.8

> Durchschnittliche Lesezeit bei zufallsgesteuerten Schreibvorg„ngen5.637 ms 5.8

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Either it really is getting that much data moved during the test, or perhaps the firmware's been tuned to perform better on WinSat tests? How old is that drive?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How do I see which firmware I use and how old the drive is? Do you know good tools for this?

// Edit

I used HD Tune to get the Data:

Firmware 1AJ100E4 (if this the one with the AMD850 southbridge issues? But I use a 750). I purchased the drive by the end of last year.

//Edit 2

made an update to 1AJ100E5

I'll make new tests. Maybe the new firmware fixes this curious things

Edited by MagicAndre1981
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it at all possible that, at some point during the test, it is reading from the Cache or from memory instead of the physical disk? That would explain a speed increase at least.

I moved all these posts out of the WEI topic.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea left. I updated the BIOS, changed the cable, flashed the Samsung Firmware, installed the latest AHCI driver (1.2.1.197 from Catalyst 10.7).


- <DiskMetrics>
<AvgThroughput kind="Sequential Read" units="MB/s" ioSize="65536" score="7.0">135.57187</AvgThroughput>
<AvgThroughput kind="Random Read" units="MB/s" ioSize="16384" score="7.9">2426.07007</AvgThroughput> <---------------------------
<Responsiveness Kind="AverageIORate" units="ms/IO" score="5.3" factor="0.0">5.38000</Responsiveness>
<Responsiveness Kind="GroupedIOs" units="units" score="6.4" factor="0.0">13.52123</Responsiveness>
<Responsiveness Kind="LongIOs" units="units" score="5.8" factor="0.0">22.39657</Responsiveness>
<Responsiveness Kind="Overall" units="units" score="5.9" factor="0.0">302.82925</Responsiveness>
<Responsiveness Kind="Cap" Reason="FAILED">TRUE</Responsiveness>
</DiskMetrics>

When I run the WinSAT command from comandline and redirect the output, the values are lower.

I think this is a bug in WinSAT. I'll ignore it now.

Edited by MagicAndre1981
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the issue is now gone. When I now run WinSAT the highest value is 5.9 again. Maybe an update fixed it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.