MSFN Forum: WindowsFWG 3.11 Question - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

WindowsFWG 3.11 Question Rate Topic: -----

#21 User is offline   toutounet 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 11-January 10

Posted 23 July 2010 - 06:06 PM

F-PROT for DOS is here:
http://fprot.org/fr_english.php

latest update: 20.11.2008


#22 User is offline   dencorso 

  • Adiuvat plus qui nihil obstat
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 3,966
  • Joined: 07-April 07
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 23 July 2010 - 07:55 PM

Welcome to MSFN, toutounet! And thanks! :thumbup

#23 User is online   JorgeA 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • Group: Supreme Sponsor
  • Posts: 774
  • Joined: 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 28 July 2010 - 09:28 PM

View PostMijzelf, on 23 July 2010 - 03:12 AM, said:

View PostJorgeA, on 22 July 2010 - 08:32 AM, said:

After the scans had run for a while on the 3.11's hard disk via the network, I noticed that the icons on my Win98FE tower's desktop had disappeared. The Quick Launch icons also went away, although the little squares where they sit would still rise if you put the cursor over them. The file and drive icons in Windows Explorer all disappeared, as did the icons that show next to the listings in Start --> Programs. Only the icons in the notification area stayed intact.

That sounds like a resource leak. I suppose that somehow the combination virusscanner/NetBEUI somehow leaks resources. In that case the problem is on the W98 side.
...

Mijzelf,

I'm curious to find out what may have caused this weird behavior. Based on your hypothesis, I found this article which points to a utility that I might try. (See the second paragraph under "Tracking GDI resource leaks.") The link is dead and I haven't found any other working links to it, but -- in general, how does investigating along these lines sound to you?

Also, the list in Start --> Programs ended up rearranged. Had never happened before the icons got wiped out. Could the two be related?

Everybody else is also welcome to chime in with ideas on what may have been going on! :)

--JorgeA

#24 User is offline   Mijzelf 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 449
  • Joined: 11-April 07

Posted 31 July 2010 - 10:34 AM

Quote

I'm curious to find out what may have caused this weird behavior. Based on your hypothesis, I found this article which points to a utility that I might try. (See the second paragraph under "Tracking GDI resource leaks.") The link is dead and I haven't found any other working links to it, but -- in general, how does investigating along these lines sound to you?

You always want to go to the bottom, don't you? When you stumble on a dead link, you can try the Wayback Machine, and, in this case, it worked.
In this case, I think you can determine *if* there is a resource leak, by using the resource meter tool, and scan again.

#25 User is online   JorgeA 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • Group: Supreme Sponsor
  • Posts: 774
  • Joined: 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 03 August 2010 - 10:30 PM

View PostMijzelf, on 31 July 2010 - 10:34 AM, said:

You always want to go to the bottom, don't you? When you stumble on a dead link, you can try the Wayback Machine, and, in this case, it worked.
In this case, I think you can determine *if* there is a resource leak, by using the resource meter tool, and scan again.

Mijzelf,

Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner -- I didn't get notification that there was a new reply waiting, and the forum traffic seems to have decreased (vacation season, no doubt), so I've been checking in less often.

Yup, I do like to try to get to understand things, if they're not too far beyond my technical ability. (And I'm willing to stretch my mind, but only so far at a time else it "breaks." ;) )

I greatly appreciate the Wayback Machine link, and the info on the resource meter. I did have the resource meter installed; will repeat the scan of the WfW3.11 machine off the Win98 PC, and see what it has to say. Thanks for reminding me of it.

About the Wayback Machine -- is there an efficient way to use it? IMX it's a slow, laborious process that turns up something useful maybe 30% of the time. There must be a better method that I'm not aware of. Can you enter a (dead) link and search for the corresponding page in the archive? Otherwise it's been like looking for a needle in a haystack. (Admittedly I don't use it often, so I'm not all that familiar with its ins and outs.)

--JorgeA

#26 User is offline   Mijzelf 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 449
  • Joined: 11-April 07

Posted 04 August 2010 - 03:11 AM

Quote

Yup, I do like to try to get to understand things
That's a good thing.

Quote

About the Wayback Machine -- is there an efficient way to use it?
The only way I'm aware of is just entering the url. When it doesn't exist TWM offers to search the whole domain, but that never gave me something useful.

Quote

Otherwise it's been like looking for a needle in a haystack.

Quote

150 billion pages
Given one piece of hay is about 1cm3, this would give a haystack of 150000m3. A very big haystack indeed. (Assuming it's an American billion. A European haystack would even be a thousand times bigger)

#27 User is offline   Judge 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: 27-June 10
  • OS:Vista Ultimate x64

Posted 04 August 2010 - 05:00 AM

I remember the good old days as a crime scene. When the FPU had a flaw in its Maths chips, causing the games the crash.

URL :realmad:

http://www.intel.com...entium/fdiv/wp/

When companies were installing DOS and WindowsFWG before "Windows 95 launch"

#28 User is offline   jaclaz 

  • The Finder
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 9,108
  • Joined: 23-July 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 04 August 2010 - 05:32 AM

View PostJorgeA, on 03 August 2010 - 10:30 PM, said:

Can you enter a (dead) link and search for the corresponding page in the archive?

Sure, that's exactly how it works. :)

You go here:
http://www.archive.org/index.php
or here:
http://www.archive.org/web/web.php
and input in the text box near the "take me back" button the dead link and press the button.

Then you need some fantasy, just as an example, try shortening the URL and adding a * (asterisk) at the end, like, say you want to find this:
http://www.v72735.f2s.com/LetAssig/
you enter it in the search box and you get this:
http://web.archive.o...s.com/LetAssig/
from this you can explore and see if the page is complete, it has working links, etc.
But you can also "widen" the search like:
http://www.v72735.f2s.com/*
http://web.archive.o...72735.f2s.com/*
(sometimes things may have a different name, or have a copy renamed, you never know)

jaclaz

#29 User is online   JorgeA 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • Group: Supreme Sponsor
  • Posts: 774
  • Joined: 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 13 August 2010 - 05:56 PM

Thanks, jaclaz. It does help if one knows the original URL. In the Wayback Machine searches that I've done over the years, the URL (even an approximate one) was simply unknown, so typing one in did not even enter into my thinking. As you can imagine, then, the work has been slow and tedious. As Mijzelf put it, a needle in a very big haystack.

--JorgeA

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy