I seek a Basic Compiler for 9X & NT Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated
#1
Posted 25 July 2010 - 01:38 PM
Windows 95/NT4/98/ME/2000/XP
it needs to compile Graphical user interface Windows applications
I Need it to be possible to simply place The Executable in a directory and run it
i don't mind if it only requires a few Dynamic Link Libraries as long as they work in Windows 95/NT4/98/ME/2000/XP
any suggestions would be greatly appreciated
#2
Posted 25 July 2010 - 02:15 PM
Rainyday, on 25 July 2010 - 01:38 PM, said:
I suggest you ask your question in one or more of the following usenet newsgroups:
alt.comp.lang.visualbasic
alt.lang.basic
alt.lang.basic.compiler
alt.lang.powerbasic
comp.lang.powerbasic
comp.lang.basic.compiler
comp.lang.basic.realbasic
comp.lang.visualbasic
microsoft.public.basic.dos
Some of those groups will be more appropriate (or useful, or active) than others.
#3
Posted 26 July 2010 - 04:12 AM
Cheers,
Oerg
#4
Posted 26 July 2010 - 08:59 AM
oerg866, on 26 July 2010 - 04:12 AM, said:
Is it free?
Is it still available?
The "current" should be Visual Basic 2010 Express
http://www.microsoft...ress/Downloads/
The 2005 version is still available, seemingly:
http://msdn.microsof...s/aa975050.aspx
As well as the 2008:
http://www.brotherso...tion-67707.html
A couple lists:
http://www.freebyte....gramming/basic/
http://www.thefreeco...ers/basic.shtml
For limited needs these look like right:
http://www.justbasic.com/
http://www.kbasic.com/
(freeware versions of Commercial apps)
Otherwise:
http://www.freebasic.net/
jaclaz
#5
Posted 26 July 2010 - 01:59 PM
and may be run on Windows 95/NT4/98/ME/2000/XP without Internet Explorer
#7
Posted 28 July 2010 - 08:51 PM
without useing Internet Explorer
#8
Posted 29 July 2010 - 10:03 AM
#9
Posted 31 July 2010 - 01:45 PM
#10
Posted 12 August 2010 - 01:41 PM
oerg866, on 26 July 2010 - 04:12 AM, said:
After installing under Win98SE Visual Basic 6.0 or Visual Studio 6.0 should I run VS Service Pack 5 vs6sp5.exe (7-Feb-2001, 130 MB) and then the Unofficial Visual Studio 6 SP6 (Win9x) by mdgx (1.9 MB http://www.mdgx.com/files/VS6SP6U.EXE ), or should I skip running vs6sp5.exe and just run mdgx's VS6SP6U.EXE?
mdgx indicates in his info file http://www.mdgx.com/files/VS6SP6U.TXT "This fix/update is cumulative. This means it includes ALL BUG fixes from all previous official + unofficial patches/(hot)fixes/updates." Because of the difference in file size it doesn't seem to be right that mdgx's SP6 update file (1.9 MB) obviates the stuff in SP5 (130 MB).
I assume that SP6 from MS (Vs6sp6.exe or Vs6sp6B.exe) is not for Win98.
This post has been edited by Multibooter: 12 August 2010 - 01:42 PM



Help
Back to top









