MSFN Forum: I seek a Basic Compiler for 9X & NT - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

I seek a Basic Compiler for 9X & NT Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Rainyday 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 25-July 10
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 25 July 2010 - 01:38 PM

Does anyone know of a good free compiler for the basic programing language of witch would allow the use of ole OCX controls in forms and also produce executable exe files for
Windows 95/NT4/98/ME/2000/XP

it needs to compile Graphical user interface Windows applications

I Need it to be possible to simply place The Executable in a directory and run it

i don't mind if it only requires a few Dynamic Link Libraries as long as they work in Windows 95/NT4/98/ME/2000/XP

any suggestions would be greatly appreciated


#2 User is offline   wsxedcrfv 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 481
  • Joined: 03-July 09
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 25 July 2010 - 02:15 PM

View PostRainyday, on 25 July 2010 - 01:38 PM, said:

Does anyone know of a good free compiler for the basic programing language

I suggest you ask your question in one or more of the following usenet newsgroups:

alt.comp.lang.visualbasic
alt.lang.basic
alt.lang.basic.compiler
alt.lang.powerbasic
comp.lang.powerbasic
comp.lang.basic.compiler
comp.lang.basic.realbasic
comp.lang.visualbasic
microsoft.public.basic.dos

Some of those groups will be more appropriate (or useful, or active) than others.

#3 User is offline   oerg866 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 02-June 10
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 26 July 2010 - 04:12 AM

I suggest Visual Basic 6.0. It's fast and works on all the afformentioned OSs.

Cheers,
Oerg

#4 User is offline   jaclaz 

  • The Finder
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 9,108
  • Joined: 23-July 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 26 July 2010 - 08:59 AM

View Postoerg866, on 26 July 2010 - 04:12 AM, said:

I suggest Visual Basic 6.0. It's fast and works on all the afformentioned OSs.

Is it free? :unsure:
Is it still available?

The "current" should be Visual Basic 2010 Express
http://www.microsoft...ress/Downloads/

The 2005 version is still available, seemingly:
http://msdn.microsof...s/aa975050.aspx

As well as the 2008:
http://www.brotherso...tion-67707.html


A couple lists:
http://www.freebyte....gramming/basic/
http://www.thefreeco...ers/basic.shtml

For limited needs these look like right:
http://www.justbasic.com/
http://www.kbasic.com/
(freeware versions of Commercial apps)

Otherwise:
http://www.freebasic.net/

jaclaz

#5 User is offline   Rainyday 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 25-July 10
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 26 July 2010 - 01:59 PM

are there a 3rd party versions of . NET Dlls such as MSCOREE.DLL of which can simply be placed in the same folder as the executable file that requires them
and may be run on Windows 95/NT4/98/ME/2000/XP without Internet Explorer

#6 User is offline   dencorso 

  • Adiuvat plus qui nihil obstat
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 3,966
  • Joined: 07-April 07
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 27 July 2010 - 11:08 AM

No.

#7 User is offline   Rainyday 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 25-July 10
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 28 July 2010 - 08:51 PM

Can i use Ocx in free basic GUI applications
without useing Internet Explorer

#8 User is offline   Tripredacus 

  • K-Mart-ian Legend
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 7,349
  • Joined: 28-April 06
  • OS:Windows 7 x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 29 July 2010 - 10:03 AM

What's wrong with QBasic? It comes with DOS 5 at least. :whistle:

#9 User is offline   shae 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 118
  • Joined: 06-July 08

Posted 31 July 2010 - 01:45 PM

View PostTripredacus, on 29 July 2010 - 10:03 AM, said:

What's wrong with QBasic? It comes with DOS 5 at least. :whistle:

Its OLE support is horrendous.

#10 User is offline   Multibooter 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 779
  • Joined: 21-March 08
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 12 August 2010 - 01:41 PM

View Postoerg866, on 26 July 2010 - 04:12 AM, said:

I suggest Visual Basic 6.0. It's fast and works on all the afformentioned OSs.
Question about updating Visual Basic 6:

After installing under Win98SE Visual Basic 6.0 or Visual Studio 6.0 should I run VS Service Pack 5 vs6sp5.exe (7-Feb-2001, 130 MB) and then the Unofficial Visual Studio 6 SP6 (Win9x) by mdgx (1.9 MB http://www.mdgx.com/files/VS6SP6U.EXE ), or should I skip running vs6sp5.exe and just run mdgx's VS6SP6U.EXE?

mdgx indicates in his info file http://www.mdgx.com/files/VS6SP6U.TXT "This fix/update is cumulative. This means it includes ALL BUG fixes from all previous official + unofficial patches/(hot)fixes/updates." Because of the difference in file size it doesn't seem to be right that mdgx's SP6 update file (1.9 MB) obviates the stuff in SP5 (130 MB).

I assume that SP6 from MS (Vs6sp6.exe or Vs6sp6B.exe) is not for Win98.

This post has been edited by Multibooter: 12 August 2010 - 01:42 PM


Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy