Jump to content

Welcome to MSFN Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account



Photo

PE Tool for creating patches

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
675 replies to this topic

#501
dencorso

dencorso

    Iuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Supervisor
  • 5,951 posts
  • Joined 07-April 07
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Try sysinternals strings.exe


How to remove advertisement from MSFN

#502
blackwingcat

blackwingcat

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 778 posts
  • Joined 31-May 08
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
That is simple reason.
1.txt is mac format.
try to change CR to CR+LF. :)

Could anyone help me to filter URLs from this file?

http://dl.dropbox.co...dows 2000/1.txt

They seem to be dead but still it'd be nice to test all of them in wget. I've been trying with batch script

FOR /F "tokens=4 delims==" %%I IN (1.txt) DO ECHO %%I>>2.txt

but can't make a loop for unknown reason (at least unknown to me ;))


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
BlackWingCat =^^=
http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

#503
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
Thank you very much. Strings.exe worked. Unfortuantely none of the URLs is still valid (as expected).

I uploaded 4 updates:

IE6.0sp1-KB2482017-Windows2000-x86-ENU.exe
Windows2000-KB2483185-x86-custom-ENU.EXE
Windows2000-KB2347290-x86-custom-ENU.EXE
MDAC281-KB983838-x86-ENU.exe

These are NOT unofficial updates. There's also 2416400 available but it's replaced by 2482017.

983838 for MDAC is the same update as 2419632 (MS11-002) for XP and the unofficial 2419632 made by WildBill.
Posted Image
Unofficial Service Pack 5.2 for MS Windows 2000 <- use this topic if you need help with UURollup, Update Rollup 2 and other unofficial packages

#504
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
I prepared 3 new updates:

Windows2000-UU-KB914783-KB974266-x86-ENU.exe (replaces KB914783-KB943729)

Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-ARA.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-CHS.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-CHT.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-CSY.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-DAN.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-DEU.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-ELL.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-ENU.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-ESN.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-FIN.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-FRA.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-HEB.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-HUN.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-ITA.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-JPN.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-KOR.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-NLD.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-NOR.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-PLK.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-PTB.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-PTG.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-RUS.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-SVE.exe (replaces 2633952)
Windows2000-UU-KBz2657025-x86-TRK.exe (replaces 2633952)

Windows2000-UU-KBz2661637-x86-Global.exe (new)
Posted Image
Unofficial Service Pack 5.2 for MS Windows 2000 <- use this topic if you need help with UURollup, Update Rollup 2 and other unofficial packages

#505
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
WildBill,

Would it be a problem for you to update your 979687 using the newest shlwapi.dll from 2483185? The new one lacks SHRegGetValueW and wordpad.exe from XP doesn't run anymore.
Posted Image
Unofficial Service Pack 5.2 for MS Windows 2000 <- use this topic if you need help with UURollup, Update Rollup 2 and other unofficial packages

#506
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
By the way, the new browseui.dll from 2483185 removes your new 32-bit explorer icons (arrows, favourites, etc) which you added in 2479628. There's also one more thing about 2479628 - it has Comctl32.dll 5.81.4968.2505 but the XP comctl32.dll 5.82.2900.6028 works too when your kernel is installed. Installing it however breaks the 32-bit icon support inside explorer so icons have black background. It'd be nice to be able to use XP's comctl32 (more APIs than 2K version) and keep 32-bit icons support... Would it be very difficult to implement?

Edited by tomasz86, 22 February 2012 - 10:51 AM.

Posted Image
Unofficial Service Pack 5.2 for MS Windows 2000 <- use this topic if you need help with UURollup, Update Rollup 2 and other unofficial packages

#507
blackwingcat

blackwingcat

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 778 posts
  • Joined 31-May 08
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
I included XP's comctl32.dll in MS10-081 for Windows 2000.
But there is a little difference from xp version (ver 5.82.2900.6029)
Some applications are checked control version by comctl32, so I changed it as same as ver 5.81.

By the way, the new shell32.dll from 2483185 removes your new 32-bit explorer icons (arrows, favourites, etc) which you added in 2479628. There's also one more thing about 2479628 - it has Comctl32.dll 5.81.4968.2505 but the XP comctl32.dll 5.82.2900.6028 works too when your kernel is installed. Installing it however breaks the 32-bit icon support inside explorer so icons have black background. It'd be nice to be able to use XP's comctl32 (more APIs than 2K version) and keep 32-bit icons support... Would it be very difficult to implement?


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
BlackWingCat =^^=
http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

#508
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

I included XP's comctl32.dll in MS10-081 for Windows 2000.
But there is a little difference from xp version (ver 5.82.2900.6029)
Some applications are checked control version by comctl32, so I changed it as same as ver 5.81.

Do you remember which applications had problems when XP's comctl32 was used? What exactly happened?
Posted Image
Unofficial Service Pack 5.2 for MS Windows 2000 <- use this topic if you need help with UURollup, Update Rollup 2 and other unofficial packages

#509
blackwingcat

blackwingcat

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 778 posts
  • Joined 31-May 08
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
I forgot the application name.
But The problem is the dialog can't display.


I included XP's comctl32.dll in MS10-081 for Windows 2000.
But there is a little difference from xp version (ver 5.82.2900.6029)
Some applications are checked control version by comctl32, so I changed it as same as ver 5.81.

Do you remember which applications had problems when XP's comctl32 was used? What exactly happened?


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
BlackWingCat =^^=
http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

#510
blackwingcat

blackwingcat

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 778 posts
  • Joined 31-May 08
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
My blog reader found the IE6SP1 problem.
If you open an artcle from http://jp.msn.com/, IE6SP1 crashes.

And fixed it on my custom hotfix (v4).

Please Someone test it ?
WLU

I changed shlwapi and mshtml.dll from original MS11-003.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
BlackWingCat =^^=
http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

#511
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

My blog reader found the IE6SP1 problem.
If you open an artcle from http://jp.msn.com/, IE6SP1 crashes.

And fixed it on my custom hotfix (v4).

Please Someone test it ?
WLU

I changed shlwapi and mshtml.dll from original MS11-003.

Thanks BlackWingCat :)

There is a problem when installing the update - shlwapi.dll is installed correctly but mshtml.dll is not installed at all. I still have ver. 1663 after installing the update.

Edited by tomasz86, 24 February 2012 - 11:02 PM.

Posted Image
Unofficial Service Pack 5.2 for MS Windows 2000 <- use this topic if you need help with UURollup, Update Rollup 2 and other unofficial packages

#512
acus

acus

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 45 posts
  • Joined 30-January 10
Hi,
I think that the BWC hotfix instals files from rtmgdr folder, because mshtml.dll ver. 1664 is located in RTMQFE folder.

Regards

Edited by acus, 25 February 2012 - 11:57 AM.


#513
WildBill

WildBill

    Senior Member

  • Developer
  • 697 posts
  • Joined 09-August 05
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag


I included XP's comctl32.dll in MS10-081 for Windows 2000.
But there is a little difference from xp version (ver 5.82.2900.6029)
Some applications are checked control version by comctl32, so I changed it as same as ver 5.81.

Do you remember which applications had problems when XP's comctl32 was used? What exactly happened?


XP's comctl32.dll is not compatible with the changes in 2479628. The layout of the cursor/icon structures are different. XP added 32-bit support fields in the middle of the structure, whereas to maintain backward compatibility in Win2k I had to add the extra fields to the end.

In other news, I think I'm almost there with 2393802-v9, but I'm having issues getting the larger csrss messages going across from kernel32 to basesrv. They're getting dropped somewhere once they get into csrsrv. I decided that since csrsrv.dll is rather small, the easiest thing to do would be to rewrite it from scratch based on the disassembly and load it up with debugging output when it sees problems. The rewrite is about 90% finished, and in the process I'm finding that MS did a shockingly poor job in writing it. They left it wide open to crashes if it gets invalid inputs, and looking at the XP version shows that it isn't any better. I'm probably going to add a compiler directive so it can be compiled as an "original" version and a "paranoid" one. One major difference is that I'm writing it in Delphi 6.0 instead of C (since I'm just not a C person), but this affords me the opportunity to make *sure* that the code is valid. Just be glad I'm not writing it in Ada ;)

Edited by WildBill, 27 February 2012 - 12:20 AM.


#514
blackwingcat

blackwingcat

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 778 posts
  • Joined 31-May 08
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
PeTool v0.0.5 always crushes when I reload DLL.
Access violation at address 00403E6C in module 'PETool.exe'.
I think it doesn't initialize data area, when reload another dll.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
BlackWingCat =^^=
http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

#515
WildBill

WildBill

    Senior Member

  • Developer
  • 697 posts
  • Joined 09-August 05
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Yeah, that's a long-standing bug that I never fixed. Someday when I have some time I need to fix that. Maybe once 2393802-v9 is out. At present I'm still working on the csrsrv.dll rewrite, though there are only a handful of routines left to do. Then I have to test it, debug it, and harden it (and then I have to finish the patch...)

No wonder there have been so many LPC exploits in Windows over the years. This DLL would *never* pass code reviews where I work. It's utter garbage.

#516
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
I've prepared a beta version of Unofficial Updates Rollup. It's created 100% automatically by a script without any manual work involved. This is a multilanguage version. I'm working on the English one (many more English only updates included) but it's quite tricky and much more complicated.

I tested the global version in HFSLIP (no difference between integrating the rollup and integrating the single updates) and also in a VM. No problems occured.

Windows2000-UURollup-BETA-x86-Global.exe (6.01 MB)

Edited by tomasz86, 06 March 2012 - 12:21 PM.

Posted Image
Unofficial Service Pack 5.2 for MS Windows 2000 <- use this topic if you need help with UURollup, Update Rollup 2 and other unofficial packages

#517
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
I prepared a BETA2 of UU Rollup. I haven't added any more updates yet but there were a few bugs which I've fixed, ex. not all files were installed the rollup was installed in a running system (slipstreaming worked fine). I'm sure there're still other issues to be fixed though.

Windows2000-UURollup-BETA2-x86-Global.exe (6.02 MB)

Edited by tomasz86, 10 March 2012 - 04:06 PM.

Posted Image
Unofficial Service Pack 5.2 for MS Windows 2000 <- use this topic if you need help with UURollup, Update Rollup 2 and other unofficial packages

#518
the xt guy

the xt guy

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 102 posts
  • Joined 19-July 06
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

I see a need for a complete pack of all the hotfixes for 2K: official, unofficial, HBR and paid ($) support fixes. As you said Tomasz86 (over on the RyanVM board) there are about 300 patches in total for 2K, too many for most to download and manage.

The problem with all in one packs is, what one person deems essential, someone else considers optional or even undesireable to install on a system (I consider WMP spyware and use a 3rd party media player. There are many other 3rd party apps I use instead of the ones that come with 2K. I even uninstall IE6, since it is hopelessly outdated-even unsafe on the net and use Firefox or K-Meleon.)

I consider 2K Microsoft's best operating system.

Edited by the xt guy, 10 March 2012 - 02:05 PM.


#519
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
I've been working on Unofficial SP6 which will include everything but it's still a long way to go.


For now, I've prepared a BETA3 of UU Rollup (Global). I've added KB927489 and fixed some issues with manual uninstall and reinstall. I think I haven't said it before but this rollup does not require unofficial kernel to work.


Windows2000-UURollup-BETA3-x86-Global.exe (14 MB)

Edited by tomasz86, 11 March 2012 - 06:34 PM.

Posted Image
Unofficial Service Pack 5.2 for MS Windows 2000 <- use this topic if you need help with UURollup, Update Rollup 2 and other unofficial packages

#520
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
Unofficial Updates Rollup (BETA4) ready. I've added Services, True Type Fonts (TTF) Pack and Script 5.8. There was also a mistake in all previous versions - the official 972270 is not replaced by the rollup.

And I think I haven't mentioned it before but of course UU Rollup is fully compatible with HFSLIP.


Windows2000-UURollup-BETA4-x86-Global.exe (20.3 MB)

Edited by tomasz86, 13 March 2012 - 01:38 AM.

Posted Image
Unofficial Service Pack 5.2 for MS Windows 2000 <- use this topic if you need help with UURollup, Update Rollup 2 and other unofficial packages

#521
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
EDIT: From this moment all information about everything I do will be available here & here.

EDIT: There was a small bug in BETA5. Please use BETA5a instead.

I've prepared a BETA5 of Unofficial Updates Rollup. I've only fixed some bugs. This one is very likely to be the final version.


Windows2000-UURollup-BETA5a-x86-Global.exe (20 MB)

Edited by tomasz86, 23 March 2012 - 07:41 AM.

Posted Image
Unofficial Service Pack 5.2 for MS Windows 2000 <- use this topic if you need help with UURollup, Update Rollup 2 and other unofficial packages

#522
blackwingcat

blackwingcat

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 778 posts
  • Joined 31-May 08
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
msvcrt.dll (VC6 Runtime) compatible to Windows XP/2003.
I use in KDW msvcrt changed a little change from 2003's one.

Lastest DBGHELP.DLL is included in last SDK, and it is Advanced compatible to XP7s one.
Almost game installers include it. :)

CryptStringToBinaryA/W
WIndows 2000 has native both functions.
Plz see offcet 00072180 and 0007232A (5.131.2195.7147)

I just finished going through all of the files for VS2008 and found that the following APIs are needed to run it:

MSVCRT.DLL -> _vscwprintf (WIC)
MSVCRT.DLL -> _wtof (WIC, WPF)
MSVCRT.DLL -> _aligned_free (WIC)
MSVCRT.DLL -> _aligned_malloc (WIC)
MSVCRT.DLL -> ___lc_codepage_func (WPF, XPS)
MSVCRT.DLL -> ___lc_handle_func (WPF, XPS)
MSVCRT.DLL -> __uncaught_exception (WPF, XPS)
MSVCRT.DLL -> _resetstkoflw (WPF)
MSVCRT.DLL -> __crtGetStringTypeW (XPS)
MSVCRT.DLL -> __crtLCMapStringW (XPS)
MSVCRT.DLL -> ___mb_cur_max_func (XPS)
MSVCRT.DLL -> __pctype_func (XPS)
MSVCRT.DLL -> _strtoi64 (XPS)
MSVCRT.DLL -> _strtoui64 (XPS)

DBGHELP.DLL -> SymLoadModuleEx
DBGHELP.DLL -> SymEnumTypes
DBGHELP.DLL -> SymGetTypeInfo

CRYPT32.DLL -> CryptStringToBinaryA
CRYPT32.DLL -> CryptStringToBinaryW


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
BlackWingCat =^^=
http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

#523
WildBill

WildBill

    Senior Member

  • Developer
  • 697 posts
  • Joined 09-August 05
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Hey all, just a little news update...

I've finished rewriting csrsrv in VS2005 for KB2393802 v9 and it's working well. I've significantly hardened it against attack and fixed what I think are several bugs in the original. I could take the hardening approach one step farther, but I haven't decided to do it yet as it would be pretty paranoid. I also think I've fixed the crash issue in the UP PAE kernel (ntkrnlpa.exe). Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on how you look at it) I;m seeing that the SxS messages that my upgraded kernel32 is generating are getting lost in basesrv.dll (which csrsrv loads). The easiest thing to do is going to be to rewrite basesrv as well, which I think will be a lot easier since it's a lot smaller than csrsrv and now I have a starting codebase to work with. I'm still working nearly every day on KB2393802 v9 and I'm bound and determined to finish it.

I've put in doxygen comments for all of the routines in my csrsrv, but not yet for variables, types, etc. I'm not sure that it's really necessary as they're pretty self-explanatory. If people wish I can post the sources for it in the meantime in case anyone wants to improve on it.

#524
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,520 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
@WildBill

The ole32.dll 5.0.2195.7060 from your 979687 seems to be buggy. Please check this and the following post.

Edited by tomasz86, 03 April 2012 - 02:59 AM.

Posted Image
Unofficial Service Pack 5.2 for MS Windows 2000 <- use this topic if you need help with UURollup, Update Rollup 2 and other unofficial packages

#525
WildBill

WildBill

    Senior Member

  • Developer
  • 697 posts
  • Joined 09-August 05
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
(sigh)

Sometimes I wonder why I put myself through this...

I've completely rewritten csrsrv.dll and basesrv.dll in C and I've significantly hardened them against attack. Then I figured it would be straightforward to update kernel32.dll to finish KB2393802-v9. But nooo..... for some reason I just can't make it work at the assembler level, partially because I can't trace its progress. So I decided to bite the mother-of-all-bullets...rewrite kernel32.dll in C as well.

In 5 days I've implemented 329 exported functions out of about 850, though the pace will slow down as the remaining ones become more and more complex. Nevertheless, it's proving to be a much simpler process than rewriting csrsrv and basesrv -- mainly because kernel32 apparently doesn't really do all that much: it farms out the heavy lifting to csrsrv, basesrv, winsrv, and ntdll and is mostly just a wrapper for those DLL's. So this mainly an exercise of cranking the handle by examining each function in IDA's decompiler and implementing a version that VS2005 can digest. In some cases IDA produces code that is pretty convoluted and I have to do some rewriting, but so far it's not nearly as bad as it was for csrsrv and basesrv -- the code in kernel32 just isn't that complex.

I'm hoping that this will be the last DLL I have to rewrite to get the patch working, since there isn't that much involved in getting SxS support going, and I've already done all the kernel-side stuff. The big unknown will be making sxs.dll happy, though I don't expect to have to rewrite it, just include it.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users