MSFN Forum: New rig - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

New rig old one sold Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   nitroshift 

  • Beware of programmers with screwdrivers!
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 2,812
  • Joined: 29-November 05
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 29 September 2010 - 07:10 AM

Hey guys!


I'm after parts for my new pc, so far I chose these:


CPU: AMD Phenom II x2 550 87.99 USD

Mobo: Asus M4A89TD PRO 179.99USD

PCI-E: Sapphire ATI Radeon HD5770 1GB 144.99 USD

RAM: Mushkin Silverline 2x2GB DDR3 76.99 USD

PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower 650W 169.99 USD

As for the HDD, I have a pair of 73.4 GB @15k rpm SAS drives that I'm planning to use in a RAID 0 array using this card: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16816117158 (129.99 USD) only for the OS (data will be kept on a separate drive that I already have).


Please chime in and let me know what you think (CoffeFiend's and PuntoMX's thoughts will prevail ;) )



nitroshift

PS. I have kept the water-cooling system and I will be using it in the new rig.Prices are taken off newegg.com, although I will be buying the parts from local shops.


#2 User is offline   Sp0iLedBrAt 

  • MSFN Addict
  • Group: Supreme Sponsor
  • Posts: 1,587
  • Joined: 19-March 09
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 29 September 2010 - 10:01 AM

Just to tell you there's some problem with the links. They open just as they are shown newegg.co.....

#3 User is offline   bonestonne 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 846
  • Joined: 27-July 05

Posted 29 September 2010 - 12:06 PM

Antec TruePower 550 would be a better PSU for that build. Better efficiency, quieter fan, and it'll be easier to work with. 650 is overkill. Also, remember that the TruePower series do not peak at their rated output, that is there highest rated continuous. The 550W Antec True Power peaks closer to 600-620W if you really think you'll be approaching those power needs.

Also, for the price, why not go for a quad core? I'm sure it's well more power than you'll realistically need, but the availability would mean you don't have to buy another CPU in the future.

I have no complaints about any other components, although for the 5770, I would suggest the MSI Hawk version, it's quieter and cools better than most other stock cards.

#4 User is offline   nitroshift 

  • Beware of programmers with screwdrivers!
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 2,812
  • Joined: 29-November 05
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 29 September 2010 - 12:28 PM

View Postbonestonne, on 29 September 2010 - 12:06 PM, said:

Antec TruePower 550 would be a better PSU for that build. Better efficiency, quieter fan, and it'll be easier to work with. 650 is overkill. Also, remember that the TruePower series do not peak at their rated output, that is there highest rated continuous. The 550W Antec True Power peaks closer to 600-620W if you really think you'll be approaching those power needs.

Also, for the price, why not go for a quad core? I'm sure it's well more power than you'll realistically need, but the availability would mean you don't have to buy another CPU in the future.

I have no complaints about any other components, although for the 5770, I would suggest the MSI Hawk version, it's quieter and cools better than most other stock cards.



Note taken on the PSU, thanks. As for the CPU, that Phenom II can be unlocked to 4 cores ;) And the 5770 will be watercooled too.

@SpoiledBrat
Links work just fine here, both on IE9 Beta and Firefox 3.6.10.

#5 User is offline   5eraph 

  • Update Packrat
  • Group: Supreme Sponsor
  • Posts: 816
  • Joined: 04-July 05
  • OS:XP Pro x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 29 September 2010 - 02:46 PM

View Postnitroshift, on 29 September 2010 - 12:28 PM, said:

@SpoiledBrat
Links work just fine here, both on IE9 Beta and Firefox 3.6.10.

I'm sure Sp0iLedBrAt meant the abbreviated links like "http://www.newegg.co..." which are now conspicuously absent from your "unedited" post, nitroshift. ;) They didn't work for me either.

You can't fool a fellow mod. :P

This post has been edited by 5eraph: 29 September 2010 - 02:52 PM


#6 User is offline   nitroshift 

  • Beware of programmers with screwdrivers!
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 2,812
  • Joined: 29-November 05
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 29 September 2010 - 02:51 PM

View Post5eraph, on 29 September 2010 - 02:46 PM, said:

I'm sure Sp0iLedBrAt meant the abbreviated links like "http://www.newegg.co..." which are now conspicuously absent from your "unedited" post, nitroshift. ;):P



LinkS? What linkS? There's only one... :ph34r:

PS. I've edited the post after noticing that IE9 was loading the pages from cache and didn't link to the original pages in the first place... Oh well, something new to report to the IE team over at Microsoft :D

#7 User is offline   5eraph 

  • Update Packrat
  • Group: Supreme Sponsor
  • Posts: 816
  • Joined: 04-July 05
  • OS:XP Pro x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 29 September 2010 - 02:53 PM

LOL.

It does look like a decent system though as is. :)

This post has been edited by 5eraph: 29 September 2010 - 02:55 PM


#8 User is offline   puntoMX 

  • n00b of Masters and Vice Versa
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 4,686
  • Joined: 28-June 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 29 September 2010 - 04:13 PM

View Postnitroshift, on 29 September 2010 - 12:28 PM, said:

Note taken on the PSU, thanks. As for the CPU, that Phenom II can be unlocked to 4 cores ;) And the 5770 will be watercooled too.
yes, "can" be unlocked but that's not 100% for sure. Get an Athlon X4 635 or 640 and see if you can unlock L3 cache, better chance with that. To bad if you can't unlock L3 cache but at least you will have the 4 cores ;) (Got my 620 with unlocked L3 at 3.4+GHz).

PSU you picked is a bit expensive indeed. And you know the deal... GIGABYTE GA-890FXA-UD5, ultra Mega Super PRO*. :lol: Did I miss something special with the ASUS?

* 3 Year factory warranty included.

#9 User is offline   nitroshift 

  • Beware of programmers with screwdrivers!
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 2,812
  • Joined: 29-November 05
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 29 September 2010 - 11:31 PM

@PuntoMX



The reason I chose the Asus mobo is the PCI-E port that fits the RAID-controller card. Gigabyte doesn't have it :(

#10 User is offline   allen2 

  • Not really Newbie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,439
  • Joined: 13-January 06

Posted 30 September 2010 - 01:11 AM

I will just speak about the raid controller: the one you choose isn't worth the money (performance wise) as it doesn't come with read/write cache.
I would go for another (now Lsi) 3ware 9650 2lp : http://www.superbiiz...6DSYPGJdosKo6Gq as it comes with 128MB cache.

#11 User is offline   nitroshift 

  • Beware of programmers with screwdrivers!
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 2,812
  • Joined: 29-November 05
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 30 September 2010 - 01:13 AM

Thanks allen2, will have to look around and see if that particular controller is available here.

#12 User is offline   allen2 

  • Not really Newbie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,439
  • Joined: 13-January 06

Posted 30 September 2010 - 02:51 AM

Any sas raid controller with at least 64MB Cache would perform better than the intel one as its chipset (LSI 1064E) is quite basic and a little old (first released in 2006). As a side note go with a controller with some thermal cooling as those animals may produce a lot of heat when performing heavy duty like defrag.

#13 User is offline   puntoMX 

  • n00b of Masters and Vice Versa
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 4,686
  • Joined: 28-June 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 30 September 2010 - 09:46 AM

View Postnitroshift, on 29 September 2010 - 11:31 PM, said:

The reason I chose the Asus mobo is the PCI-E port that fits the RAID-controller card. Gigabyte doesn't have it :(
So, you think a PCI-E x4 card doesn't fit in a x16 sloth? Think again. :lol:

#14 User is offline   bonestonne 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 846
  • Joined: 27-July 05

Posted 30 September 2010 - 10:41 AM

Ha, but why buy an extra RAID controller? They're pretty expensive for one that's actually good.

Only other thing I can think of is that some slots are GPU only (but that's mostly a problem with ITX and mATX boards.

(Devil's Advocate).

#15 User is offline   alrichdesa 

  • Giving Windows 7 A Shot
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 08-February 09
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 30 September 2010 - 12:08 PM

I am running an XFX 5770, it performance is decent for its price. Overclocks like a darl too...950Mhz and 1400 Mhz Core and Memory respectively using AMD Overdrive :)

Make sure you get a genuine copy of Windows 7 to make use of all its capabilities.

#16 User is offline   puntoMX 

  • n00b of Masters and Vice Versa
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 4,686
  • Joined: 28-June 04
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 30 September 2010 - 12:37 PM

View Postbonestonne, on 30 September 2010 - 10:41 AM, said:

Ha, but why buy an extra RAID controller? They're pretty expensive for one that's actually good.
He has some 15k rpm SAS drives ;). But yes, for some 145GB space he could be better off using other drives like a SDD (40-64GB for 110-130USD) or SDD with some HDDs for storage.

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy