[blackwingcat]

Hi.

You can ignore "Return Code = 4", "Failure while generating dynamic path, 0xf111" and "halaacpi.dll failed: 0xe0000102"

But "Return Code = 3 " may be had problem.
Try to regsvr after reboot.

regsvr32 cryptui.dll
regsvr32 wintrust.dll
regsvr32 licdll.dll

danny111, on 19 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

Hi
Some of you may know that I have been trying to make a Korean version of KernelEx...
At some point, I made it, thanks to the helpful suggestion of you guys.
After install of v22e, accidentally I opened the setup log file and I found many lines of failure message.
I think many messages are just void and ignorable, but not all.
I can see also that registration of some DLLs have failed.
Any ideas?

[KB935839-v22e.log]
================================================================================
5.531: GetGenericPathNameWithRoot: Unable to open HKLM, SOFTWARE\Microsoft\ResKit\NameSpace\Windows 2000 Resource Kit, 0x2.
5.531: SetDynamicDirectoryId: Failure while generating dynamic path, 0xf111
5.531: GetGenericPathNameWithRoot: Unable to open HKLM, Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\App Paths\eudcedit.exe, 0x2.
5.531: SetDynamicDirectoryId: Failure while generating dynamic path, 0xf111
..........
5.610: DoInstallation: FetchSourceURL for e:\work\v22e-kor\update\update.inf failed
5.610: LoadFileQueues: UpdSpGetSourceFileLocation for halaacpi.dll failed: 0xe0000102
..........
45.297: Starting process: regsvr32 /s credui.dll
45.360: Return Code = 0
45.360: Starting process: regsvr32 /s cryptui.dll
45.485: Return Code = 3
45.485: Starting process: regsvr32 /s sccsccp.dll
45.922: Return Code = 4
45.922: Starting process: regsvr32 /s sccbase.dll
46.000: Return Code = 0
46.000: Starting process: regsvr32 /s msftedit.dll
46.094: Return Code = 4
46.094: Starting process: regsvr32 /s wintrust.dll
46.156: Return Code = 3
46.156: Starting process: regsvr32 /s mfc40.dll
46.360: Return Code = 0
46.360: Starting process: regsvr32 /s mfc42.dll
46.531: Return Code = 0
46.531: Starting process: regsvr32 /s mfc42u.dll
46.594: Return Code = 0
46.594: Starting process: regsvr32 /s licdll.dll
46.672: Return Code = 3
........
================================================================================

[tomasz86]

@blackwingcat

It's same here. Cryptui.dll, wintrust.dll and licdll.dll can't be registered. Do they register on your system?

[danny111]

BlackWingCat, u're right.
These files are properly registered after REBOOT: cryptui.dll, wintrust.dll, licdll.dll
Some more problems here:
(1) I still cannot register "propsys.dll", it says "cannot load to register...". Can I just ignore this issue?
(2) "dwmapi.dll" is not installed or copied to System folder. It's very WEIRD 'cos it's definitely in the copy list in "update.inf".
(3) Is "KB931125-Root Certificate Update" really required? I did not install this package because the MS's update page asks me to verify XP system before download.

Thanks.

This post has been edited by danny111: 21 September 2012 - 01:19 AM

[blackwingcat]

Yes, they were installed in My virtual English environment .

tomasz86, on 20 September 2012 - 10:55 PM, said:

@blackwingcat

It's same here. Cryptui.dll, wintrust.dll and licdll.dll can't be registered. Do they register on your system?

You must install most recent "KB931125-Root Certificate Update", because IE6.0sp1 security update(MS12-052) requires it.

danny111, on 21 September 2012 - 01:15 AM, said:

BlackWingCat, u're right.
These files are properly registered after REBOOT: cryptui.dll, wintrust.dll, licdll.dll
Some more problems here:
(1) I still cannot register "propsys.dll", it says "cannot load to register...". Can I just ignore this issue?
(2) "dwmapi.dll" is not installed or copied to System folder. It's very WEIRD 'cos it's definitely in the copy list in "update.inf".
(3) Is "KB931125-Root Certificate Update" really required? I did not install this package because the MS's update page asks me to verify XP system before download.

Thanks.

I uploaded Extended kernel v22f and RDP v7.0 client for Windows 2000.

[Tommy]

I'm posting this here as I'm sure it requires some bit of kernel extension. Unfortunately I think this is the case where you'll gain something but also lose something. It is possible to get video thumbnails working in Windows 2000. As long as you can get your hands on a copy of shmedia.dll from Windows XP, copy it to the system32 folder, and then use open a command prompt and type in regsvr32 shmedia.dll and press enter to load it into memory.

But now there is one more vital step you need to follow. The general instructions are here under workaround: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/292499

However, in step 3, substitute .gif with .wmv, .avi, or whatever else (I've only tested this with those two file formats though) Edit: This doesn't work with .mov files as far as I know

Now in step 10, substitute that value with {c5a40261-cd64-4ccf-84cb-c394da41d590}.

Now right click in a folder that contains these video files and choose thumbnail view. If done correctly, it should display the very first frame as a thumbnail preview just as Windows XP does. However, it seems the drawback from using this is it shows up as an image thumbnail in left explorer bar rather than showing an actual video preview using a small Windows Media Player bar.

So whether or not this is for you, is up to you. I'm only posting it in this thread as I imagine it does require blackwingcat's kernel extension. Hope this helps someone anyway.

This post has been edited by SearanoX: 23 September 2012 - 10:02 PM

[Molecule]

piotrhn, on 17 September 2012 - 09:34 AM, said:

Can you fix Daemon Tools Lite, to use on Win2000. Current version (4.45.4.0316) doesn't work, only
STOP
IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL
**Address 804F573A base at 804D7000, DateStamp 4ff7f93a - ntoskrnl.exe

just in case something a little earlier than the latest might do ...

Molecule, on 23 September 2012 - 02:07 AM, said:

4. virtual scsi driver (needed for daemon tools) the file SPTDinst-v181-x86.exe appears in Kurt Austs's Run1_W2Ksp5.bat batch file, but not shown in his download links for daemon tools
... SCSI Pass Through Direct setup v1.78.0.0 built by: WinDDK, by Duplex Secure Ltd. (http://www.duplexsecure.com/downloads/)
5. daemon tools -- IMHO should be std device for software installs DT Lite version 3.47 free (2004) runs in 98se, and most importantly its installer doesn't ask user to add a google toolbar (edit- integrate as addon won't violate free license) per Kurt Aust's 2K site, I installed DTLite4356-0091.exe (edit - w2k latest) the 4.356 installer prompts user to install the google toolbar -- I don't see any functional difference (between older and newer versions, except bloat), and actually prefer the earlier 347 version because of its logic and simplicity ... it has same speed and capacity ... 4 devices, and imho is more friendly - ie doesn't look like bubblegum

This post has been edited by Molecule: 24 September 2012 - 01:59 AM

[piotrhn]

Can you add to
kernel32:
ProcessIdToSessionId


Shell32:
RestartDialogEx

These functions are rquired by Expendables II Game.

This post has been edited by piotrhn: 24 September 2012 - 03:31 AM

[jimmsta]

I have a couple questions -
Are the functions that are being implemented just stub functions that return a 0, or are they fully functional functions? (try saying that 5 times fast!)
If they're just stubs, I'd guess that you're utilizing all of the publically available documentation for these functions on their respective platforms, such as MSDN and ReactOS's source code?

Would you consider continuing this project for Windows XP in the coming years? I still see a _LOT_ of XP machines in use (computer tech in a small computer store), and a _LOT_ of people trying to use newer apps (Office 2013, for instance, requires Vista+) and having to either downgrade or upgrade just to write documents (ugh!).

And then there's this gray area question - would you consider a project that tries to replace the NT5.0 kernel with NT5.2's Windows Research Kernel? The source code is available through universities, along with the full NT Design Documentation, allowing one to literally build their very own custom kernel for Windows. I don't know if such a project would be considered legal or what, since the code is intended for research and teaching purposes only, I can't say what the status would be

[blackwingcat]

Hi.

Yes any functions so that.
But return 0 means sometimes ERROR_SUCCESS and sometimes FAILS
The stub functions usually are used when I don't know the fucntion's specification and I understand that the functions are not important and I want to work the application.

jimmsta, on 24 September 2012 - 03:54 PM, said:

I have a couple questions -
Are the functions that are being implemented just stub functions that return a 0, or are they fully functional functions? (try saying that 5 times fast!)
If they're just stubs, I'd guess that you're utilizing all of the publically available documentation for these functions on their respective platforms, such as MSDN and ReactOS's source code?

At least, I don't take it till the end of microsoft support XP, because many hotfix will be released and it is current product.

jimmsta said:

Would you consider continuing this project for Windows XP in the coming years? I still see a _LOT_ of XP machines in use (computer tech in a small computer store), and a _LOT_ of people trying to use newer apps (Office 2013, for instance, requires Vista+) and having to either downgrade or upgrade just to write documents (ugh!).

It is almost impossible migrate for windows 2000, But it would become a great help to increase the function with reference to that

jimmsta said:

And then there's this gray area question - would you consider a project that tries to replace the NT5.0 kernel with NT5.2's Windows Research Kernel? The source code is available through universities, along with the full NT Design Documentation, allowing one to literally build their very own custom kernel for Windows. I don't know if such a project would be considered legal or what, since the code is intended for research and teaching purposes only, I can't say what the status would be

This post has been edited by blackwingcat: 24 September 2012 - 05:55 PM

[blackwingcat]

I released Japanese version IE6SP3 for Windows 2000 with extended kernel.

http://blog.livedoor...es/1712272.html

Could you provide me a file localized following files in XP for other language.

inetcplc.dll
mshtml.tlb
mshtmler.dll
shdoclc.dll
extmgr.dll
inetcpl.cpl
iexplore.exe

This post has been edited by blackwingcat: 24 September 2012 - 08:59 PM

[acus]

Hi Blackwingcat,

I tried to send you a message.
Maybe your inbox is full?

[blackwingcat]

Sorry, I deleted some messages.

acus, on 24 September 2012 - 09:51 PM, said:

Hi Blackwingcat,

I tried to send you a message.
Maybe your inbox is full?

[tomasz86]

blackwingcat, on 24 September 2012 - 08:58 PM, said:

inetcplc.dll
mshtml.tlb
mshtmler.dll
shdoclc.dll
extmgr.dll
inetcpl.cpl
iexplore.exe

Aren't all of them available in XP SP3?

[blackwingcat]

Thx I released English version IE6SP3 for Windows 2000.

[acus]

Hi Blackwingcat,

if it is simple and you have free time, could you produce an installer for IE6SP3, like the one for the extended kernel?

regards

[blackwingcat]

I think I can do it.
But IE6 SP3 shell image component is not compatible, so I think I can't replace IE6SP1.
Perhaps it will become the option browser like firefox.

acus, on 27 September 2012 - 11:57 AM, said:

Hi Blackwingcat,

if it is simple and you have free time, could you produce an installer for IE6SP3, like the one for the extended kernel?

regards

[plachance]

Hi, Just coming out of windows 98 kernel ex and I have 1 machine that is a win2k server which I need to keep running for the for see able future. I have managed to install V1.5 for this machine but can't bring it up to V2.2 because of the MS12-095 issue. I understand there is an ISO that it can be extracted from but I can't seem to find it in the ISO. If someone would be so kind as to let me know what I need to do to finish the V2.2 upgrade it would be appreciated. THX!

[blackwingcat]

Hi,
What is MS12-095 issue ?
(Is it the future Microsoft Security Hole? http://technet.micro...lletin/ms12-095 )
On Windows 2000 iso file can be mount by Microsoft VCD Driver.

plachance, on 02 October 2012 - 12:02 PM, said:

Hi, Just coming out of windows 98 kernel ex and I have 1 machine that is a win2k server which I need to keep running for the for see able future. I have managed to install V1.5 for this machine but can't bring it up to V2.2 because of the MS12-095 issue. I understand there is an ISO that it can be extracted from but I can't seem to find it in the ISO. If someone would be so kind as to let me know what I need to do to finish the V2.2 upgrade it would be appreciated. THX!

[piotrhn]

Can you fix Spyware Terminator 2012, Application can't start because couldn't find user32 ->user32.dll, userenv->userenv.dll

This post has been edited by piotrhn: 04 October 2012 - 02:12 PM

[blackwingcat]

I'll take it easy

piotrhn, on 04 October 2012 - 02:11 PM, said:

Can you fix Spyware Terminator 2012, Application can't start because couldn't find user32 ->user32.dll, userenv->userenv.dll