[IcemanND]

But how can they make their backups when they have processors but no RAM?

[jaclaz]

IcemanND, on 04 February 2011 - 10:31 AM, said:

But how can they make their backups when they have processors but no RAM?

Well, but they have BOTH SIMMs and DIMMs (and SO-DIMMs too), though.

jaclaz

[dencorso]

Even so, their work usually stalls, because of too many office meetings for planning and follow-up.

[BlouBul]

dencorso, on 05 February 2011 - 09:55 PM, said:

Even so, their work usually stalls, because of too many office meetings for planning and follow-up.

That is because there are just loose chatter and gossip with no real solutions

[jaclaz]

BlouBul, on 06 February 2011 - 01:37 AM, said:

That is because there are just loose chatter and gossip with no real solutions

Not at all , real problem is that there is ONLY C++ (and not C#) and lots of foos, but no bars.

jaclaz

[dencorso]

jaclaz, on 06 February 2011 - 10:52 AM, said:

real problem is that there is ONLY C++ (and not C#) and lots of foos, but no bars

[BlouBul]

jaclaz, on 06 February 2011 - 10:52 AM, said:

Not at all , real problem is that there is ONLY C++ (and not C#) and lots of foos, but no bars.

And of course, lots of classes, but no objects, and too many programmers, but no code...

[jaclaz]

BlouBul, on 07 February 2011 - 12:21 AM, said:

And of course, lots of classes, but no objects, and too many programmers, but no code...

Yes and no , there are galleys (to be proofed ) and no Alpha's or Beta's, but only Gamma's.
Not one final, nothing is ever released , but often something (mainly proofs of concept) are issued.
There are Freeware and Commercial Apps, but no Shareware, formatting tools but no partitioning utilities.

jaclaz

This post has been edited by jaclaz: 07 February 2011 - 06:35 AM

[BlouBul]

jaclaz, on 07 February 2011 - 02:30 AM, said:

Yes and no , there are galleys (to be proofed ) and no Alpha's or Beta's, but only Gamma's.
Not one final, nothing is ever released , but often something (mainly proofs of concept) are issued.

Which obviously have the effect that all the speech recognition apps can only do Afrikaans , Finnish and Russian, with no English, Italian or Portuguese

[jaclaz]

BlouBul, on 07 February 2011 - 07:45 AM, said:

Which obviously have the effect that all the speech recognition apps can only do Afrikaans , Finnish and Russian, with no English, Italian or Portuguese

Sure Yeess, rest assured, but there are good chances that soon (but not currently ) there will be a few supporting Elmer Fudd and Yiddish (check the google translate, which is also available - unlike Babelfish):
http://www.google.co...age_tools?hl=en
http://www.google.co...bhp?hl=xx-elmer

jaclaz

[BlouBul]

jaclaz, on 07 February 2011 - 08:37 AM, said:

Sure Yeess, rest assured, but there are good chances that soon (but not currently ) there will be a few supporting Elmer Fudd and Yiddish (check the google translate, which is also available - unlike Babelfish):
http://www.google.co...age_tools?hl=en
http://www.google.co...bhp?hl=xx-elmer

Good find Fortunately the chances are slim that Klingon and hacker will make the list
http://www.google.co...p?hl=xx-klingon
http://www.google.co...hp?hl=xx-hacker

[BlouBul]

Anyway, speaking of Elmer Fudd, it is good to know there are a lot of Looney Tunes
There are Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Lola Bunny and Melissa Duck, but no Porky and Petunia Pig.
Although Tweety Bird is there, there is no Sylvester cat (but I tawt I taw a puddy tat)
There are a Road Runner, but no Wile E. Coyote
Also Speedy Gonzales is there, but no Taz or Michigan J. Frog

This post has been edited by BlouBul: 07 February 2011 - 01:36 PM

[jaclaz]

BlouBul, on 07 February 2011 - 12:43 PM, said:

Good find Fortunately the chances are slim that Klingon and hacker will make the list

You are right correct , AFAIK next additions, planned and foreseen (but not deliberated, nor authorized, nonetheless approved and allowed ) are:
http://en.wikipedia....Star_Trek_races
Aaamazzarite, Gallamite and Cardassian
(don't ask me why, by they don't use alphabetic order, but a hidden bubblesort )

... among the many cartoons, you need to remember how there are also Goofy, and Minnie, but no Micky Mouse nor Donald Duck

jaclaz

[BlouBul]

jaclaz, on 07 February 2011 - 01:41 PM, said:

AFAIK next additions, planned and foreseen (but not deliberated, nor authorized, nonetheless approved and allowed ) are:
http://en.wikipedia....Star_Trek_races
Aaamazzarite, Gallamite and Cardassian
(don't ask me why, by they don't use alphabetic order, but a hidden bubblesort )

Although no reliable sources could be found, some gossip and utterances were understood to call attention to the matter that transmitting intoAnnunaki and Reptillian were eyeballed as well.

[jaclaz]

Additionally several illiterates dwell and occupy the room (professors as well - though no teachers ) all adducing miscommunications (but not misconceptions) as root of all corruptions.
Depression and distress affecting all peeps, and sicknesses currently classified irrelevant and meaningless that will soon assume an utterly criticalness.

jaclaz

[BlouBul]

jaclaz, on 08 February 2011 - 11:20 AM, said:

Additionally several illiterates dwell and occupy the room (professors as well - though no teachers ) all adducing miscommunications (but not misconceptions) as root of all corruptions.
Depression and distress affecting all peeps, and sicknesses currently classified irrelevant and meaningless that will soon assume an utterly criticalness.

Across the street, an immense assemblage of intellectuals (mostly engineers and programmers, with NO lawyers and politicians) were alluding through carefully planned affairs that the scatterbrains opposite them will be oodles happier and fitter if they willingly choose to apply their little grey sallow cells effectively

This post has been edited by BlouBul: 08 February 2011 - 01:05 PM

[jaclaz]

BlouBul, on 08 February 2011 - 12:52 PM, said:

Across the street, an immense assemblage of intellectuals (mostly engineers and programmers, with NO lawyers and politicians)...

I see, you mean "opposite, an impressive rally " , but there are also many Communists and quite a few party bosses, but NO leaders.
Will they end up in putting together a committee?

jaclaz

[dencorso]

Also lobbyists and smooth operators and berry peddlers aplenty, commixing with the masses.

[BlouBul]

jaclaz, on 08 February 2011 - 01:31 PM, said:

... many Communists and quite a few party bosses, but NO leaders.

The obviousness of their leaderlessness is for all to see. Regardless of the account that no one is equal, none is more equal than others. Nevertheless all is different

This post has been edited by BlouBul: 09 February 2011 - 04:18 AM

[dencorso]

Then again, leaders cannot thrive, because there *is* *one* caudillo: Commander Guillermo Armadillo!