Cannot de-select File & Print Sharing on www NIC
#1
Posted 08 June 2011 - 01:06 PM
Greetings.
I am experiencing (once again) a randomly, recurring problem.
Two of my XP (someone [else] still use/remember XP?) laptops (G & I) connect
to the internet by either a WLAN NIC or ethernet NIC and
then connect to the other laptop by either an crossover/ethernet or USB-NET NIC/cable.
Right now G connects to the web by WLAN and connects to I by crossover/ethernet.
Right now I connects to the web by a USB to ethernet adapter
(connected to I by a PCMCIA USB card) and connects to G by (built-in) ethernet.
Right now I connects to XP laptop T by USB-NW cable.
I never connect T to the web anymore.
G uses its internal WLAN & ethernet "NICs".
The problem is that when I de-select File & Print Sharing (F&PS) on the NIC connected to the web,
I lose F&PS on the local LAN NICS.
De-selecting F&PS also makes changes to the "Adapters & Bindings" under Advanced Settings.
Other similar bizarre things happen, like if I de-select NWLink NetBIOS on the NIC
connected to the web, the other NICS on the local LAN lose the NWLink NetBIOS setting.
These things do not always happen but they are happening again now.
I could/would go into more detail if/when someone might be able to help me
figure out what is going on and why ...
(I have always had to use NWLInk IPX/SPX/NetBIOS Tranport & NWLink NetBIOS
with TCP/IP on my local crossover ethernet LAN connections.
I could use NWLink IPX/SPX/NetBIOS WITHOUT TCP/IP but
would then not have local LAN IPaddresses.
The USB-NW "NIC" absolutely requires NWLink IPX/SPX/NetBIOS.)
Any helpful replies/insights appreciated.
Thank you.
Regards,
AEN
Ć
#2
Posted 08 June 2011 - 01:44 PM
With XP, you should only rely on tcp/ip protocol even when using nwlink (some remain of Novell Netware).
#3
Posted 17 November 2011 - 03:18 PM
Greetings.
This posting (and the underlying issue) is(are) not about IPX/SPX.
MS dropped IPX/SPX with Vista, so USB-Link products for Vista
have to include IPX/SPX for the install.
USB-Link products for XP could rely on the built-in IPX/SPX.
I have to use IPX/SPX (& also use TCP/IP) for the USB-Link connection.
This posting is about disabling File&Print Sharing.
I gave the details in my original posting.
One detail to add is that under Network Connections \ Advanced \ Advanced Settings \ Adapters&Bindings,
I can deselect (on each/every NIC) TCP//IP from F&PS (& Client for MS Networks)
but have to select (on each/every NIC) IPX/SPX for F&PS (& Client for MS Networks).
However, like posted originally, I cannot deselect F&PS on the General Tab
under each individual NIC Properties.
This problem has come & gone but has not gone away this time.
If I deselect F&PS on the wwwNIC, F&PS becomes disabled on each/every NIC
on the General Tab under each individual NIC Properties.
I should be able to deselect F&PS for the wwwNIC without losing F&PS on the other NICS ...
#4
Posted 26 February 2012 - 12:52 PM
Any helpful replies/insights appreciated.
Thank you.
Regards,
AEN
Ć
#5
Posted 03 August 2012 - 10:30 AM
For the past year I have had the problem described in this thread.
Now, all of sudden for some unknown reason, I can
deselect File&PrintSharing on my wwwNICs ...
without XP then proceeding to deselect F&PS on the other NICs and
thus disable my (crossover/USB) LAN connections ...
I can only guess that maybe this is because
I am NOT using Windows to manage my wwwNICs on any laptops -
(I am using the 3rd party wwwNIC management utilities) - and
do not have WZC enabled on any of the wwwNICs ...
I still hope to hear from someone who actually know something about this ...
#6
Posted 03 August 2012 - 11:06 AM
I assume you are NOT using Wireless?
Looking at your other posts, you don't provide much info....
"NEED INPUT" (Johnny Five)
#7
Posted 04 August 2012 - 12:40 AM
Seeing as how I wrote»
AEN007, on 03 August 2012 - 10:30 AM, said:
I can only guess that maybe this is because
I am NOT using Windows to manage my wwwNICs on any laptops -
(I am using the 3rd party wwwNIC management utilities) -
submix8c, on 03 August 2012 - 11:06 AM, said:
I also have no idea why you wrote»
submix8c, on 03 August 2012 - 11:06 AM, said:
Maybe you don't understand the details of the issue ...
There is nothing helpful in your reply.
Maybe you just like to make posts that try to criticize ...
#8
Posted 05 August 2012 - 11:00 AM
WTF is "wwwNIC"? Maybe THAT is causing the problem? Do you assume (a**-u-me) that we all use this "3d party software" and are familiar with it? HE** NO I'm not going to install it just to "test" your problem. I do things the old fashioned way - by hand using the OS!
And you have "no idea" why I wrote "assume no wireless" when you SPECIFICALLY stated
Quote
Look at your OTHER topic, I tried to help with... VERY detail-lacking!
(j*rk!)
This post has been edited by submix8c: 05 August 2012 - 11:02 AM
#9
Posted 07 August 2012 - 12:31 AM
submix8c, on 05 August 2012 - 11:00 AM, said:
Not only do you only speak hacker's English, but you are also unpleasant - snide & vulgar ... and seemingly clueless ...
maybe you should "get a life" and get out of the forum(s) ...
AEN007, on 04 August 2012 - 12:40 AM, said:
Maybe you just like to make posts that try to criticize ...
#10
Posted 07 August 2012 - 07:14 AM
<--- Look to the left...
Now search for all that are designated as such. It wasn't "free" or "by donation" - it was EARNED!
Quote
I am NOT using Windows to manage my wwwNICs on any laptops -
(I am using the 3rd party wwwNIC management utilities) - and
do not have WZC enabled on any of the wwwNICs ...
Quote
BTW, Date and Time is in the Post itself - no need to "log" it in your posts.
Just for you... Looks like you do this type of thing everywhere - Opera, Hydrogenaudio, Videolan, Freecommander, etc etc...
And here...
Courtesy of jaclaz...
Enjoy your stay.
This post has been edited by submix8c: 07 August 2012 - 07:41 AM
#11
Posted 07 August 2012 - 08:18 AM
submix8c, on 03 August 2012 - 11:06 AM, said:
I assume you are NOT using Wireless?
Looking at your other posts, you don't provide much info....
"NEED INPUT" (Johnny Five)
AEN007, submix8c's question was perfectly valid. So everyone needs to settle down and get back to the problem or else this thread will get locked.



Help
Back to top









