USSR98SE, on 13 January 2012 - 11:28 AM, said:
I don't want to install a XP , which is Nano at the beginning...
That's why I said it was NOT an answer to your question. (actually it is, but not the answer you wanted)
No other kid wants to play with me with the XPCLI stuff

.
USSR98SE, on 13 January 2012 - 11:28 AM, said:
I also remove stuff afterwards.
That is the traditional way, but why adding it in the first time, if you later remove it?
USSR98SE, on 13 January 2012 - 11:28 AM, said:
I don't want to install a XP , which is Nano at the beginning... I also remove stuff afterwards.
Today I will try to slim down XP to 500 MB's if it is possible.
Sure it is.
You should be able to get a largely functional XP below 300 Mb But of course as always it depends what you *need* and how you rate "largely functional".
Here is a step-by-step for one at around 400 Mb:
http://www.i64x.com/eeexp.php
USSR98SE, on 13 January 2012 - 11:28 AM, said:
I don't want to install a XP , which is Nano at the beginning... I also remove stuff afterwards.
I know some sites with tips, but they are down.
Ever heard of the Wayback Machine?
http://www.archive.org/
submix8c, on 13 January 2012 - 12:17 PM, said:
A running "nano" ("installed")??? Have you tried a Live XP? Don't get more "nano" than that! How does about 125mb grab you? Yes, you CAN put it onto an HDD, USB, CD, whatever is bootable...
Well, LiveXP is NOT an XP, it is a PE 1 .x.
And if you are gong the PE way, there are much smaller builds than that. (and again it depends on the functionalities you want/need), a couple oldish examples:
http://www.911cd.net...showtopic=12067
http://www.911cd.net...showtopic=16543 http://www.brian-hoo...artPE%20AIO.php
but also the various Winbuilder "barebone" projects are much smaller than that.
jaclaz