Jump to content

Welcome to MSFN Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account



Photo

Windows 8 - Deeper Impressions


  • Please log in to reply
6135 replies to this topic

#2626
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,222 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Looks like boot to desktop and start menu are coming back.
http://winsupersite....l-it-windows-78

That is fantastic news!! :thumbup :thumbup

Here's the key passage:

Mary Jo Foley has reported on Microsoft’s plans to bring back the Start button and allow customers to boot directly to the desktop in Windows 8.1 And I’ve separately confirmed that this is really happening, with the Start button, in particular, driven by upper management, which overruled objections from the Windows team.

(emphasis added)

And Paul Thurrott seems to have done yet another 180 on the Windows 8 interface:

One might theorize that this wrong-headed decisiveness is what led to Steve Sinofsky’s departure from Microsoft, and that the current edict to fix things from on high is something that could never have happened with him still in charge. But that doesn’t matter. What matters is that Microsoft, is belatedly, is finally listening to feedback from its customers and changing the product as a result. That is, by far, the most alarming thing that didn’t happen—Windows division protestations to the contrary notwithstanding—during the Sinofsky regime.

Put simply, Microsoft should have designed Windows 8 this way from the beginning, and didn’t because the Windows division was given too much free reign after its Windows 7 successes. And it’s doing it now because the leadership that triggered six years of ignoring customer wishes is no longer there. As a result, Windows 8.1 will more closely resemble Windows 7 than the original Windows 8 version.


This may also allay concerns about Microsoft pushing the Windows Store in users' faces: if people will now be able to use the Start Button (but will it call up the Start Menu?) and boot directly to the Desktop, it's hard to see how the Metro side and its app store can remain as obnoxious as they've been.

But all in all, it's good to hear that someone in charge at Microsoft might actually be listening to flesh-and-blood customers, as opposed to hiding behind a wall of "scientific data."

--JorgeA


How to remove advertisement from MSFN

#2627
Formfiller

Formfiller

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Joined 03-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

And I’ve separately confirmed that this is really happening, with the Start button, in particular, driven by upper management, which overruled objections from the Windows team.


So, all the Sinofsky bashing apparently had merit? Was W8 not so much a coordinated corporate "plan" but more of a hipster gone amok?

Edited by Formfiller, 20 April 2013 - 02:22 AM.


#2628
Formfiller

Formfiller

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Joined 03-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Oh, MS is screwing up yet again.



View 18:40. Apparently only the start button comes back, not the start menu! Also at around 21:00 Thurrott mentions that only the "business versions" will get this.

I've written about this.......:
http://www.msfn.org/...ost__p__1036968

Edited by Formfiller, 20 April 2013 - 02:53 AM.


#2629
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,222 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag
Thanks, Formfiller. Here's a remarkable exchange between Leo, Mary Jo, and Paul. Starts around 24:10. Leo and Mary Jo are not Metro fans, but Leo's view is especially caustic:

MJF: I don't know -- I only see this as good news. i've gotten so much e-mail about this this week from people begging me -- "oh, can you do anything to make this happen, this would be so awesome." Listen, I want to read one note that I got from from a guy, because he admits he's not a power user, but he's a very experienced Windows user. He says:

"I am not a computer professional, I'm a highly experienced user. In my youth, I learned to fly three different jets: an F-4, an F-111, and an EF-111. I know my way around technology. But Microsoft made this too hard."

PT: Yikes -- I can fly a plane, I cannot use Windows 8.

MJF: -- but I can't get used to the Charms, and --

PT: That's incredible.

MJF: And, you know, that's the kind of mail I've been getting. I have 600 comments on this article, and some of them are from design purists who say Microsoft should not capitulate, they should just make people do this, and this is the right thing -- they did the right thing. And then the rest of them are like, "please bring this back, please please, we really need this!" So it'll be interesting to see if this comes to pass.

LL: Heh, "design purists" or "design fascists"?...

PT: Yeah, there is a subtle distinction between "purist" and "fascist" <laughter>.

LL: I'm surprised that there would be that kind of reaction from people like, "this is a terrible idea." It just surprises me.

PT: The dumbest thing about this, though, is -- all they had to do was do this in the first place. And like I said, it didn't have to be obvious, it didn't even need to be a UI switch -- people like Mary Jo and I, we could have written our little tips about how you can bring back the old UI, and everyone would have been happy. It's amazing that they didn't do this.


Then they go on to an interesting discussion about Microsoft's "telemetry," also worth listening to.

But you're right -- this is only part of the cake. It's like someone grabbing your wallet, your phone, and your keys, and then offering to give back your phone and keys when you object.

--JorgeA

Edited by JorgeA, 20 April 2013 - 08:19 AM.


#2630
jaclaz

jaclaz

    The Finder

  • Developer
  • 14,576 posts
  • Joined 23-July 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
On unrelated news, the rage is mounting :ph34r: about the "hypothetical" EULA of the "hypothetical" google glasses:
http://www.wired.com...-glass-resales/
http://hothardware.c...-Loan-Them-Out/

jaclaz

#2631
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,222 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

On unrelated news, the rage is mounting :ph34r: about the "hypothetical" EULA of the "hypothetical" google glasses:
http://www.wired.com...-glass-resales/
http://hothardware.c...-Loan-Them-Out/

jaclaz

Whoa, the discussion in the comments to the first article ranged far and wide, from heath care to fluoride in the public water. :blink:

But actually, based on the article Google's terms for this prototype sound more or less reasonable. They're having people try the glasses out in the field, and the selected testers shouldn't be handing them off to third parties, let alone to possible competitors.

OTOH, if these restrictive terms make it to the final commercial version, that's a different story. Not to mention the possibilities for monitoring/tracking individual people that the device represents.

--JorgeA

#2632
Formfiller

Formfiller

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Joined 03-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
I am having a blast reading the comments there:

http://winsupersite....l-it-windows-78

Lots of whining by metrotards. "No, these desktop users should be dragged kicking and screaming into metro! It's the future"

These people are f***ed up in the head. And I mean it. Totally demented. Why is metro the future if the majority of Windows customers hate it? Is there some natural law here? The whole DOS-Windows analogy doesn't work here. Windows was until W95 basically just a GUI on-top of DOS, and no one was forced to use it. People began to chose it freely, and top notch applications started to appear for it. By the time Windows became really a mandatory environment (95), great applications were already available for it and there was a sizable user base. And even on Windows 95 (and 98) you were able to boot straight into DOS if you wanted it.

With metro we have a environment that is panned and hated, with applications way below the level of the previous paradigm in functionality and quantity (the interface itself is severely crippled compared to the "outdated crap") yet users need to be dragged into it.. why the heck? What's the reasoning besides "MS needs 30% of the store money"?

Edited by Formfiller, 20 April 2013 - 01:15 PM.


#2633
jaclaz

jaclaz

    The Finder

  • Developer
  • 14,576 posts
  • Joined 23-July 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Windows was until W95 basically just a GUI on-top of DOS,

Actually also DURING and AFTER it, until Me. :whistle: :ph34r:

The NT family was/is another thing.....

jaclaz

#2634
Formfiller

Formfiller

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Joined 03-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
News from the shill-zoo:

http://www.osnews.com/comments/26959

Read the comments there by "Nelson". If that guy isn't paid he needs to apply at MS marketing ASAP.

#2635
CharlotteTheHarlot

CharlotteTheHarlot

    MSFN Master

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,054 posts
  • Joined 24-September 07
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

I am having a blast reading the comments there:

http://winsupersite....l-it-windows-78

Lots of whining by metrotards. "No, these desktop users should be dragged kicking and screaming into metro! It's the future"

These people are f***ed up in the head. And I mean it. Totally demented.

Check out the NeoWin thread that covers this story ...

Did Microsoft execs overrule Windows team to put Start button back in Windows 8.1? ( NeoWin 2013-04-20 )

Every single thing we have said about them, that they are exceeding all expectations of Apple or Google or Linux fanboism, is on display. MetroTards on Parade. :yes:

... Let him who hath understanding reckon the Number Of The Beast ...


#2636
CharlotteTheHarlot

CharlotteTheHarlot

    MSFN Master

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,054 posts
  • Joined 24-September 07
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
I think it's important to get Thurrott on the record here. From his "Short Takes" on Windows IT Pro ...

Short Takes: April 19, 2013 ( Thurrott 2013-04-19 )

Yes, Virginia, Microsoft Is Bringing the Start Button Back to Windows 8

And it’s going to let you boot to the desktop, bypassing the loathed new Start screen, too. I’ve confirmed these rumors with my own sources, as has my Windows Weekly co-host Mary Jo Foley, so I think we can move this one into the “fact” category, though of course details about how these changes will be implemented remain foggy. I do find it interesting that Microsoft CFO Peter Klein, while not explicitly acknowledging the changes, did oddly admit that the company update to Windows 8—called Windows 8.1 and code-named “Blue”—will include changes guided by “customer feedback.” I’m of two minds regarding this news. On the one hand, I’m glad Microsoft is finally listening to customers, many of whom have been very clear that Windows 8 as currently implemented isn't hugely interesting to them because of its too-radical design change. But on the other hand, what the heck, Microsoft? What took so damned long? The past six years—the Sinofsky regime, basically—are most obviously marked (to me, at least) by the Windows division’s abject disinterest in customer feedback. No, not disinterest. Disdain. And I really do hope that’s changing. This is a black mark that the company, and Windows, will find it hard to recover from.


As I've said before, Paul is clinically bipolar. He has actually voiced every possible permutation of all possible opinions along the way. However, what he wishes for is truly irrelevant. What is he predicting here? I can't tell. He is vague on what the return of the "Start Button" actually means. Is it a GUI button shortcut to the Metro Start Screen or not? Clearly he knows squat.

Maybe They Should Just Call It Windows 7.8 ( Thurrott 2013-04-19 )

For example, when Windows 95 shipped with the then-new Explorer user interface, customers who pined for the previous Program Manager interface could reconfigure it for that by editing an INI file. And when Microsoft radically changed the Start menu in Windows XP, it allowed customers to return to what it called the “classic Start menu” so that the system more closely resembled its predecessor, Windows 2000.

But Windows 8 offers none of these customer-centric niceties. A pop-up Start tip replaces the Start button, a full-screen Start screen replaces the Start menu, and the PC now boots into the mobile “Metro” environment instead of the desktop, even on traditional computers. And in each case, there is no way to configure the system to go back to the previous interface. This is a first for Microsoft and Windows, and as I reported last summer, the firm even went to the drastic step of removing legacy Start menu code from the internals of Windows to ensure that third party developers wouldn’t be able to do so either. (Developers have instead been forced to recreate these interfaces manually instead, a process that is more time- and resource-intensive.)

Was that a good decision? No, absolutely not.


Now in this follow-up, Paul "The Desktop Must Die!" Thurrott seems a little more sure in that they are actually listening, and get this, he agrees! Yeah sure. Now he has certainly stated the facts correctly, at last. But where was he for the past two years! Breaking the backwards compatible paradigm has been our beef for ages now. We have pointed out ProgMan in Win95 and Classic in WinXP. You are two years late to the party Paul. However, I still do not believe this story that the Start Menu is coming back. Nor do I even understand whether Paul is predicting this or is in fact being clever by being vague. In other words, they might just bring back the Start Button and still have it point to the Playskool Metro interface.

EDIT: added article(s)

Edited by CharlotteTheHarlot, 21 April 2013 - 02:20 AM.

... Let him who hath understanding reckon the Number Of The Beast ...


#2637
Formfiller

Formfiller

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Joined 03-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Well, Paul already said in the video I linked that they will bring only the button back, without the start menu. At least for now.

#2638
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,222 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag
More news and views on Windows 8 sales and its effects:

Analyst: Microsoft’s Windows 8 Strategy Was A Disaster

Redmond yesterday announced its earnings for the first quarter of the year in a conference call. But interestingly, the software giant again stopped shy of providing any concrete Windows 8 sales numbers.

While Windows 8 is slowly increasing its market share, with more and more users upgrading to the new operating system, a fair number of analysts still consider the OS a controversial product — controversial in the sense that it split the user base in two because of the sweeping changes introduced in the UI.

The fact that Microsoft did not throw any numbers also gives them a reason to blast away.

Shaw Wu is one such analyst over at Sterne Agee, who believes that Microsoft played its cards all wrong as far as Windows 8 is concerned. The user interface changes would have been much more acceptable had there been a choice.



The Microsoft number we all want to know: Windows 8 sales to date

On April 18, Microsoft didn't share the one number many company watchers had been awaiting: An updated count of number of Windows 8 licenses sold.

I'm curious when and if Microsoft provides a new update on number of Window 8 licenses sold. Maybe that will happen at Computex or TechEd North America -- both happening the first week of June this year? In any case, today's silence on this front is ... interesting.

It's safe to say that if sales of Windows 8 were anything more than mediocre (not to say disastrous), Microsoft would be trumpeting the news for the world to hear.


What a Windows 8 U-turn will mean for the PC

Many PC OEMs are dissatisfied with what Microsoft has done with Windows 8 and the way the company has handled the negative response to the operating system. Privately, one OEM source told me that Microsoft is "destroying" the PC industry, while another claimed that Windows 8 has "handed over millions of customers to Apple."

(emphasis added)

The commenters there are particularly sensible and well worth reading. The top three at the time I visited the site:

I doubt that it will be a U-turn

More like a series of 45 degree turns before and they will be back to their old Metro tricks when they realise any pickup in sales.

At least . . .

At least it's a Start. :-)

Just not having to help my family and friends install Classic Shell on every computer would be an improvement. But if access to the Start Menu not the default, I will end up still having to help them find the setting in Windows. What they need to do is offer each user a choice as the account is being set up for the first time.

As they say…

'Admitting you have a problem is the first step to recovery'

So let’s see how far is Microsoft going with “the program” and if they will ever recover from them Metro Madness that has engulfed them.

--JorgeA

#2639
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,222 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag
More news and views on Windows 8 sales and its effects:

Analyst: Microsoft’s Windows 8 Strategy Was A Disaster

Redmond yesterday announced its earnings for the first quarter of the year in a conference call. But interestingly, the software giant again stopped shy of providing any concrete Windows 8 sales numbers.

While Windows 8 is slowly increasing its market share, with more and more users upgrading to the new operating system, a fair number of analysts still consider the OS a controversial product — controversial in the sense that it split the user base in two because of the sweeping changes introduced in the UI.

The fact that Microsoft did not throw any numbers also gives them a reason to blast away.

Shaw Wu is one such analyst over at Sterne Agee, who believes that Microsoft played its cards all wrong as far as Windows 8 is concerned. The user interface changes would have been much more acceptable had there been a choice.



The Microsoft number we all want to know: Windows 8 sales to date

On April 18, Microsoft didn't share the one number many company watchers had been awaiting: An updated count of number of Windows 8 licenses sold.

I'm curious when and if Microsoft provides a new update on number of Window 8 licenses sold. Maybe that will happen at Computex or TechEd North America -- both happening the first week of June this year? In any case, today's silence on this front is ... interesting.

It's safe to say that if sales of Windows 8 were anything more than mediocre (not to say disastrous), Microsoft would be trumpeting the news for the whole world to hear.


What a Windows 8 U-turn will mean for the PC

Many PC OEMs are dissatisfied with what Microsoft has done with Windows 8 and the way the company has handled the negative response to the operating system. Privately, one OEM source told me that Microsoft is "destroying" the PC industry, while another claimed that Windows 8 has "handed over millions of customers to Apple."

(emphasis added)

The commenters there are particularly sensible and well worth reading. The top three at the time I visited the site:

I doubt that it will be a U-turn

More like a series of 45 degree turns before and they will be back to their old Metro tricks when they realise any pickup in sales.

At least . . .

At least it's a Start. :-)

Just not having to help my family and friends install Classic Shell on every computer would be an improvement. But if access to the Start Menu not the default, I will end up still having to help them find the setting in Windows. What they need to do is offer each user a choice as the account is being set up for the first time.

As they say…

'Admitting you have a problem is the first step to recovery'

So let’s see how far is Microsoft going with “the program” and if they will ever recover from them Metro Madness that has engulfed them.

--JorgeA

Edited by JorgeA, 21 April 2013 - 09:03 AM.


#2640
Formfiller

Formfiller

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Joined 03-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Hey guys, in case you haven't, you should read the comments here right now:

http://www.techbroil...ot-working.html

There is some awesome action in progress. Shills and W8 haters galore..

Edited by Formfiller, 21 April 2013 - 01:59 PM.


#2641
Formfiller

Formfiller

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Joined 03-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
The future™:

There is a reason why Metro apps are "toy-like": WinRT (WinRT = Metro API) was not designed for complex programs. You will never see a WinRT Photoshop app because it would be almost impossible to create, never mind having dismal performance on bitmaps of any size (due to "brokered" file access). I saw one post on MSDN where a dev wrote a WinRT app that grabbed headers from image files in the Photos folder. It was 60-100X slower than the Desktop version because of the brokered file access. There are also limitations on image sizes due to the use of Direct3D textures for everything (some graphics hardware has a 4096 pixel limit). An additional problem is that WinRT apps have limited access to DLLs, which are used for filters in graphics apps. You can't install a "filter pack" on a WinRT graphics app. It has to be in the main install -- WinRT apps can't load a DLL dynamically from anywhere else.

None of these technical issues really matter because Adobe won't take a 30% haircut on sales anyway.


http://winsupersite....ndows-78?page=1

#2642
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,222 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

The future™:

There is a reason why Metro apps are "toy-like": WinRT (WinRT = Metro API) was not designed for complex programs. You will never see a WinRT Photoshop app because it would be almost impossible to create, never mind having dismal performance on bitmaps of any size (due to "brokered" file access). I saw one post on MSDN where a dev wrote a WinRT app that grabbed headers from image files in the Photos folder. It was 60-100X slower than the Desktop version because of the brokered file access. There are also limitations on image sizes due to the use of Direct3D textures for everything (some graphics hardware has a 4096 pixel limit). An additional problem is that WinRT apps have limited access to DLLs, which are used for filters in graphics apps. You can't install a "filter pack" on a WinRT graphics app. It has to be in the main install -- WinRT apps can't load a DLL dynamically from anywhere else.

None of these technical issues really matter because Adobe won't take a 30% haircut on sales anyway.


http://winsupersite....ndows-78?page=1

This suggests one of two outcomes: (1) Microsoft goes all-Metro, killing the Desktop and leaving Adobe (and other indepndent software companies) with the choice of either shifting to a friendlier milieu (Linux, Mac) or going the way of the dodo; (2) Microsoft never kills the Desktop off completely, due to outrage by both third-party software companies and professional and other serious PC users.

The question going forward will then be one of how sensitive Microsoft will be to independent software makers and serious/professional users.

Attached File  hear no evil.jpg   5.06KB   1 downloads

--JorgeA

Edited by JorgeA, 22 April 2013 - 08:21 AM.


#2643
bpalone

bpalone

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 175 posts
  • Joined 04-March 09
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Microsoft CFO Leaves Company

The article states "...latest in a line of top-level executives to leave the company, following Windows head Steven Sinofsky last November....".

Do they know something, that the general public doesn't? Kind of reminds one of Rats leaving the ship.

#2644
Formfiller

Formfiller

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Joined 03-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

This suggests one of two outcomes: (1) Microsoft goes all-Metro, killing the Desktop and leaving Adobe (and other indepndent software companies) with the choice of either shifting to a friendlier milieu (Linux, Mac) or going the way of the dodo; (2) Microsoft never kills the Desktop off completely, due to outrage by both third-party software companies and professional and other serious PC users.

The question going forward will then be one of how sensitive Microsoft will be to independent software makers and serious/professional users.

Attached File  hear no evil.jpg   5.06KB   1 downloads

--JorgeA


I wonder whether software companies could somehow sue Microsoft if they remove the desktop? I don't know how that could work, given that you don't sign a contract by developing software for a platform. But given the huge money involved here, I just don't see that Adobe et. al. would just call it quits and move on without a fight. Not to mention all the governments of the world who depend on the desktop for.. pretty much all their entire governing! How will they react when they find out that all their investments in MS infrastructure and desktop software is sharing the fate of the dodo? (There's a huge amount of custom Windows software there)

If you think about it, that's a real insane plan. Abandoning the desktop would mean turning the most powerful people on the planet against Microsoft. I don't even think Microsoft themselves are fully aware what kind of madness their "strategy" is.

Edited by Formfiller, 22 April 2013 - 11:19 AM.


#2645
Formfiller

Formfiller

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Joined 03-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Oh well, Microsoft's craze-run has paid off:

http://www.neowin.ne...g-steve-ballmer

Last week, Microsoft reported it generated more than $20 billion in revenue and made over $6 billion in net income for the first quarter of 2013. Despite the good news, a new report claims a well-known hedge fund is planning to announce it has bought a significant amount of stock in the company as part of a plan to potentially force Steve Ballmer out of his chief executive position at the tech giant.

CNBC, a business network on cable TV, reports ValueAct Capital is planning to buy a $2 billion stake in Microsoft, which would be about one percent of the company's total worth. The story was first revealed on CNBC's Twitter page:

ValueAct Capital was formed in 2000 and is run by Jeffrey Ubben, who will apparently reveal more about his intentions later today at an investment conference. StreetInsider.com reports that speculation has centered on Ballmer. It's possible that Ubben may try to use his stake in Microsoft to lead other investors in an effort to get rid of the chief executive.

There's also speculation that Ubben might try to convince shareholders to break up Microsoft. Microsoft's stock price has gone up more than four percent since the news of ValueAct Capital's stock purchase broke.


Great comment for once:

I hope they know it would have been cheaper to buy their staff 'Start8' rather than take this approach


Edited by Formfiller, 22 April 2013 - 01:42 PM.


#2646
Formfiller

Formfiller

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Joined 03-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
http://buzz.money.cn...oft-hedge-fund/

"We see Microsoft's consumer strategy challenges and say who cares," said Ubben, speaking Monday at the Active-Passive Investor Summit in New York.

Microsoft provides the plumbing that helps large and small businesses function, he explained. While many have derided Microsoft's inability to innovate, Ubben said that's not such a bad thing. "IT managers don't want constant change."

Microsoft should continue to capitalize on new enterprise businesses, such as instant messaging application Lync and web portal service SharePoint.

Microsoft is not good at consumer devices, but that's not the relevant lens to view the company," he said.

The changes Ubben is pushing for seem to be operational. Windows might have made Microsoft what it is today but it's not the future of the business he calls a "national treasure."

"Microsoft must consider strongly in the not too distant future making Office available outside Windows," he told attendees at the summit.


I see a HUGE conflict with Microsoft's Apple-envy mentality of the past few years here. Good that Sinofsky left in time..

#2647
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,222 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Microsoft CFO Leaves Company

The article states "...latest in a line of top-level executives to leave the company, following Windows head Steven Sinofsky last November....".

Do they know something, that the general public doesn't? Kind of reminds one of Rats leaving the ship.

Good question.

Here's something else that caught my eye in the article:

Shares of world's largest software company clicked up after the closing bell, following the news.

Hmm...

--JorgeA

#2648
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,222 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag


This suggests one of two outcomes: (1) Microsoft goes all-Metro, killing the Desktop and leaving Adobe (and other indepndent software companies) with the choice of either shifting to a friendlier milieu (Linux, Mac) or going the way of the dodo; (2) Microsoft never kills the Desktop off completely, due to outrage by both third-party software companies and professional and other serious PC users.

The question going forward will then be one of how sensitive Microsoft will be to independent software makers and serious/professional users.

Attached File  hear no evil.jpg   5.06KB   1 downloads

--JorgeA


I wonder whether software companies could somehow sue Microsoft if they remove the desktop? I don't know how that could work, given that you don't sign a contract by developing software for a platform. But given the huge money involved here, I just don't see that Adobe et. al. would just call it quits and move on without a fight. Not to mention all the governments of the world who depend on the desktop for.. pretty much all their entire governing! How will they react when they find out that all their investments in MS infrastructure and desktop software is sharing the fate of the dodo? (There's a huge amount of custom Windows software there)

If you think about it, that's a real insane plan. Abandoning the desktop would mean turning the most powerful people on the planet against Microsoft. I don't even think Microsoft themselves are fully aware what kind of madness their "strategy" is.

I doubt that software companies could sue Microsoft for removing the Desktop, unless they could plausibly bring into play some kind of antitrust angle. But it sure would destroy the business model of Adobe and so many application vendors that depend on a useful Desktop. They might be driven to porting their software to Linux and/or Mac and then forging marketing alliances with Linux distributors to push penguins.

As you point out, MSFT would absolutely make a lot of enemies if they killed the Desktop. As to whether that'd be enough to discourage them, we'll have to wait and see. There appears to be a bit of a monomaniacal, "mad scientist" quality to this Metro drive that may overrule all reason, as it had so far 'til we started hearing the rumors about the Start Button coming back.

--JorgeA

#2649
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,222 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Oh well, Microsoft's craze-run has paid off:

http://www.neowin.ne...g-steve-ballmer

Last week, Microsoft reported it generated more than $20 billion in revenue and made over $6 billion in net income for the first quarter of 2013. Despite the good news, a new report claims a well-known hedge fund is planning to announce it has bought a significant amount of stock in the company as part of a plan to potentially force Steve Ballmer out of his chief executive position at the tech giant.

CNBC, a business network on cable TV, reports ValueAct Capital is planning to buy a $2 billion stake in Microsoft, which would be about one percent of the company's total worth. The story was first revealed on CNBC's Twitter page:

ValueAct Capital was formed in 2000 and is run by Jeffrey Ubben, who will apparently reveal more about his intentions later today at an investment conference. StreetInsider.com reports that speculation has centered on Ballmer. It's possible that Ubben may try to use his stake in Microsoft to lead other investors in an effort to get rid of the chief executive.

There's also speculation that Ubben might try to convince shareholders to break up Microsoft. Microsoft's stock price has gone up more than four percent since the news of ValueAct Capital's stock purchase broke.

If they were to frame this effort as a "kill Metro" project, I'll bet they could raise a ton of capital on a crowdfunding website... ;)


Great comment for once:

I hope they know it would have been cheaper to buy their staff 'Start8' rather than take this approach

:lol:

--JorgeA

Edited by JorgeA, 23 April 2013 - 09:23 AM.


#2650
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,222 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

http://buzz.money.cnn.com/2013/04/22/microsoft-hedge-fund/

"We see Microsoft's consumer strategy challenges and say who cares," said Ubben, speaking Monday at the Active-Passive Investor Summit in New York.

Microsoft provides the plumbing that helps large and small businesses function, he explained. While many have derided Microsoft's inability to innovate, Ubben said that's not such a bad thing. "IT managers don't want constant change."

Microsoft should continue to capitalize on new enterprise businesses, such as instant messaging application Lync and web portal service SharePoint.

Microsoft is not good at consumer devices, but that's not the relevant lens to view the company," he said.

The changes Ubben is pushing for seem to be operational. Windows might have made Microsoft what it is today but it's not the future of the business he calls a "national treasure."

"Microsoft must consider strongly in the not too distant future making Office available outside Windows," he told attendees at the summit.


I see a HUGE conflict with Microsoft's Apple-envy mentality of the past few years here. Good that Sinofsky left in time..


Yup. The problem is that Microsoft wants to be all things to all people, but it can't. Nobody can. The "serious" segment of the market (business, IT, professionals, hobbyists) has a different focus and needs from the "entertainment" side that's happy with Angry Birds and YouTube videos. Trying to satisfy one segment means ticking off the other, as we've seen with the Metro mess.

I sympathize with Ubben's goals and recommendations as outlined in the linked article; unlike the present management, he seems to get what Microsoft is really all about. But I'm wondering what he means when he says, "forget about Windows." Does he mean "just leave it alone already," or does he mean "spin it off for somebody else to maintain."

--JorgeA




5 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users