Jump to content

Welcome to MSFN Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account



Photo

Windows 8 - Deeper Impressions


  • Please log in to reply
6087 replies to this topic

#6076
NoelC

NoelC

    Software Engineer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,099 posts
  • Joined 08-April 13
  • OS:Windows 8.1 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

The collected wisdoms of sir Matrix... 

 

Stuff like that makes me want to barf.  According to whatever spin doctor wrote that, Windows 9, er, 10 will be more more more! of what was wrong with Windows 8.

 

If all they have left are spin doctors, being paid to think up things like "10" instead of "9", and few actual engineers implementing things people NEED, Microsoft is truly an abysmal mess.

 

Well, that dashed what little hope I had remaining that the Technical Preview could be a little bit interesting.  :(

 

-Noel




How to remove advertisement from MSFN

#6077
jaclaz

jaclaz

    The Finder

  • Developer
  • 14,474 posts
  • Joined 23-July 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Good or bad is - as always - in the eyes of the beholder.

 

The thing that can be said for sure is that it won't be timely

 

They are talking of talking about it (besides hopefully troubleshooting/debugging/whatever) until end of April 2015 to which it is easy to add 3 to 4 months for putting together and deliver the RTM, then possibly another couple ones for "general availability", i.e. almost one year from now.

 

This would mean almost 3 years, i.e. longer than what they took to create Vista SP3 Windows 7.

 

I guess that everyone that has not yet jumped on the 8/8.1 bandwagon will keep - if at all possible - clinging to their XP or Vista or 7 for one year more (please read as "I predict a very slow increase in 8/8.1 adoption in the next months").

 

jaclaz



#6078
TELVM

TELVM

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 297 posts
  • Joined 09-February 12
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
... ( ... "I predict a very slow increase in 8/8.1 adoption in the next months") ...

 

Windows 8 and Windows 8.1 see drop in their market share as Windows 7 continues to gain momentum

 

 

... I guess that everyone that has not yet jumped on the 8/8.1 bandwagon will keep - if at all possible - clinging to their XP or Vista or 7 for one year more ...

 

After unscrewing myself watching that hilarious '10' video I'm more convinced than ever that beyond Se7en I'll stay away from that circus MS has become nowadays .



#6079
jaclaz

jaclaz

    The Finder

  • Developer
  • 14,474 posts
  • Joined 23-July 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

@TELVM

 

How queer, there was a recent article on Redmond Magazine had these (triumphant) news:

http://redmondmag.co...windows-xp.aspx

 

Windows 8 Surpasses XP User Market Share
By Scott Bekker
09/15/2014

More than four months after Microsoft stopped supporting Windows XP, Windows 8 has finally overtook the unsupported OS, according to Web site analytics firm StatCounter.

 

 

I do understand how this "OS share" numbers can have little variations/fluctuations, but I find surprising that XP is today:

http://www.winbeta.o...s-gain-momentum

 

at 23.87% and that 15 days ago it was only 12.9%:

http://redmondmag.co...windows-xp.aspx

 

I guess that based on these data we could publish an article titled :w00t::

XP almost doubles OS share in 15 days

 

 

:lol:

 

jaclaz



#6080
G8YMW

G8YMW

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 113 posts
  • Joined 20-May 08
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
http://www.eham.net/...ic,98924.0.html
My favourite Win8 shill posted this on Eham on September 16th.
The comments on his link spoke volumes to me

#6081
NoelC

NoelC

    Software Engineer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,099 posts
  • Joined 08-April 13
  • OS:Windows 8.1 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Good or bad is - as always - in the eyes of the beholder.

 

Um, no.  Not only that but... HELL NO!

 

Some things are just bad.  That's precisely my point.  Perception AND performance make up reality (though I would normally list them in the other order).  It's NOT only about perception "in the eyes of the beholder".  When someone allows it to be only about perception then we get...  Windows 8:  No actual substance, no additional actual usefulness (beyond a few bugfixes) beyond Windows 7.  And they couldn't even make the window dressing better - all they could manage were deletions.

 

Clearly even though supposedly a geek has taken the ship's wheel (and I question whether he's really excellence-oriented), a course change will take time.  Microsoft needs to stop this bull$#|+ where they roll out release after release with Marketing names until they get their act together. 

 

NO ONE would fault them for saying, "we're regrouping; it's going to take longer than we thought to release the next version, but when we do watch out!  It's going to be great!".

 

-Noel



#6082
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,169 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

 

 

Can you fill me in on the part about leaving (or not leaving) the file system in a stable state? If there's no time to explain, a link or search term will do and I'll take it from there, thanks.

 

--JorgeA

 

 

Sure. 

 

 

That was extremely helpful, thanks! The link you gave did address the subject exactly, as you said. And I even understood everything there! :)

 

Seeing as I'd be installing the Technical Preview on a machine curently running XP, that would seem to meet the requirement that the older OS be installed first, so I should be OK.

 

But I will turn off Hybrid Boot anyway. I suspect this is the reason that so may folks out there think Win8 is so wonderful because it boots so fast. Well yeah, if you put your Vista or Win7 computer to hibernate instead of actually shutting it off, you'd get that effect too. OTOH (and correct me if I'm wrong), hibernation doesn't clean things up internally and, as we know, sometimes it's necessary to do that in order to restore a sluggishly acting machine to full speed. The default Windows 8 shutdown setting prevents that from happening!

 

BTW, did you notice that the images in the TechNet article are from a pre-RTM version of Windows 8 (CP or RP) -- although the window corners are already square, they still feature the 3D window buttons. :)

 

--JorgeA



#6083
NoelC

NoelC

    Software Engineer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,099 posts
  • Joined 08-April 13
  • OS:Windows 8.1 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Yes, of course I noticed.

 

Microsoft stepped up their process of what I deem "Sheep Herding" with the pre-release versions of Windows 8.  They figured they'd ease into what was quite obviously an uglier desktop theme gradually, to try to wean people off the quite pleasant and integrated desktop experience of Windows 7.

 

The ugly realization is that they've done all this on purpose.  It's so ugly that it makes you want to turn away from it in disbelief.

 

Someone perceptive and intelligent in Marketing (but still evil) quite clearly realized that Metro/Modern didn't hold anything that was worth having that would actually draw people to that side, so they instructed their minions to make the desktop side actively worse to use.  Beyond the overt square, flat, lifeless look, there are subtle things, such as the mouse not *quite* grabbing the edges of windows where it should, or the missing sound effects for some error dialogs, or not allowing Metro/Modern apps to run with UAC disabled, or...  The list goes on of subtle things they've broken on purpose.

 

Remember when "Build a Better Mousetrap and the World Will Beat A Path to Your Door" defined an age where things truly did get better?

 

Someone got the %*$&@ bright idea that they only need to say they have a better mousetrap and people who, out of experience, still believed they would build one would keep beating that path.

 

Fool me once...

 

-Noel

 

 

Edit: typo


Edited by NoelC, Today, 09:49 AM.


#6084
NoelC

NoelC

    Software Engineer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,099 posts
  • Joined 08-April 13
  • OS:Windows 8.1 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

http://www.eham.net/...ic,98924.0.html
My favourite Win8 shill posted this on Eham on September 16th.
The comments on his link spoke volumes to me

 

Somehow I'm having trouble seeing where that XP line has fallen below that Win8.1 line.

 

Plus the shills all use adoption numbers to imply "A is better than B".

 

Lots of people get Win 8 (try to buy a computer in a store with anything lower), and they don't think it's better.  Hell, I adopted it myself with my eyes open.  I use it every day and I don't think it's any better than Win 7, and in fact find it worse in some ways -- and I'm adept at reconfiguring it to do precisely what I want/need.  I can only imagine the frustration of someone who's adopted it and doesn't know the literally hundreds of things you have to do to make it worth using.

 

-Noel



#6085
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,169 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag
Microsoft christens the next version of Windows as Windows 10

 

There is something potentially problematic in this explanation for the "10" labeling rather than "9":

 

But Microsoft went instead with Windows 10 because they wanted to signify that the coming Windows release would be the last "major" Windows update. Going forward, Microsoft is planning to make regular, smaller updates to the Windows 10 codebase, rather than pushing out new major updates years apart.

 

Anybody else think that problems could (needlessly) arise from this attempt to put everyone on the same "version" of Windows?

 

There are many programs (and indeed OSes ;) ) that I decline to use because the new "improved" version actually works worse, or had features taken out, or has features I don't want, or is plain butt-ugly. Depending on how tolerant Microsoft is of such dissidents, then under the new system either (1) I would have to conform along with everybody else and do without the removed functionality, or (2) if I could refuse to install the "updates" then my numberless version of Windows would have a different feature set than other people's numberless versions of Windows, and possibly leading to massive confusion when trying to troubleshoot a problem or discuss an OS issue. Today we can speak of Windows 7 or 8, and the listener knows more or less what he's dealing with. But if specific OS designations are abandoned, then during such a discussion we can't be sure that we're talking about the same thing.

 

I suppose we might be able to rely on the version number (6.x.yyy.zzz), but that would introduce a cumbersome additional step into the discussion. And I'm not sure what it would help, anyway -- maybe you installed a June update but not the April one, for example.

 

What do you think?

 

--JorgeA

 



#6086
NoelC

NoelC

    Software Engineer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,099 posts
  • Joined 08-April 13
  • OS:Windows 8.1 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Seems to me a constantly updating operating system will be an operating system with a new incompatibility or failure each day.

 

It's just more BS by marketing types who don't have a clue that stability matters.  Stability in both feature set and reliability.

 

Then there's the implicit problem with "trust us to make your system better and better, we will always have your best interests at heart".

 

And we thought high tech life was fun and exciting before.

 

-Noel



#6087
jaclaz

jaclaz

    The Finder

  • Developer
  • 14,474 posts
  • Joined 23-July 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

 

But Microsoft went instead with Windows 10 because they wanted to signify that the coming Windows release would be the last "major" Windows update. Going forward, Microsoft is planning to make regular, smaller updates to the Windows 10 codebase, rather than pushing out new major updates years apart.

 

Anybody else think that problems could (needlessly) arise from this attempt to put everyone on the same "version" of Windows?

 

...

 

I suppose we might be able to rely on the version number (6.x.yyy.zzz), but that would introduce a cumbersome additional step into the discussion. And I'm not sure what it would help, anyway -- maybe you installed a June update but not the April one, for example.

 

 

Don' t tell the MS marketing guys, but IMNSHO this (continuously updating a codebase) is what the engineers have done since 2006 (actually before since 2000).

 

In their own definition, there is a major and minor version of the OS.

 

NT 4.00 was 4

Windows 2000 was 5.0

Windows XP was 5.1

Server 2003 was 5.2 (and also XP 64 bit, which is actually a dumbed down version of Server 2003)

 

Those were the early "version 5" operating systems.

 

Vista was 6.0

7 was 6.1

8 was 6.2

8.1 is 6.3

 

These are the current "version 6" operating systems.

 

jaclaz



#6088
Tripredacus

Tripredacus

    K-Mart-ian Legend

  • Super Moderator
  • 9,847 posts
  • Joined 28-April 06
  • OS:Server 2012
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

A few things I found, to lighten the mood.

Why did they skip to Windows 10? Because 7 8 9.


Obviously. But then there's the Windows OS vs Star Trek movie rating trend.

I’m kind of optimistic, Windows always had a pattern to their OS releases.

Windows XP – Good
Windows Vista – Crap
Windows 7 – Good
Windows 8 – Crap
Windows 10 – Good?


But as pointed out, if this trend were to continue, Windows 10 is going to be "crap" as the "good" Windows 9 was shelved. Lastly, large image in a spoiler...

Spoiler

source: http://knowyourmeme....ultures/windows
MSFN RULES | GimageX HTA for PE 3-5 | lol probloms
msfn2_zpsc37c7153.jpg




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users