Jump to content

Welcome to MSFN Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account



Photo

Windows 8 - Deeper Impressions


  • Please log in to reply
6137 replies to this topic

#1551
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,244 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

200 bucks for a mandatory bolted-on toy interface, yummie! It's like they WANT to bring W8 down. It isn't selling well at 40$... Who would pay 200$ for this?! I think they are deranged enough to still think that W8 pro is indeed something for "Pros".

Great points! I guess we'll be getting our answer over the next few months.

I agree with @vinifera. Maybe if MS paid me $40 -- or $200 -- then I might think about it...

--JorgeA


How to remove advertisement from MSFN

#1552
jaclaz

jaclaz

    The Finder

  • Developer
  • 14,593 posts
  • Joined 23-July 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Maybe if MS paid me $40 -- or $200 -- then I might think about it...

You evidently greatly underestimate the price for giving away your moral integrity. :w00t: :ph34r:

jaclaz

#1553
CharlotteTheHarlot

CharlotteTheHarlot

    MSFN Master

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,054 posts
  • Joined 24-September 07
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Microsoft's ARM blunder: 7 reasons why Windows RT was DOA ( UK Register 2013-01-18 )

The obvious conclusion? There aren't any such customers. Windows RT is an OS that nobody asked for, sent in search of a market that's already well served by other options. Even ignoring everything else that's wrong with it, that's reason enough for it to go down in history as one of Microsoft's biggest bombs.


Very thorough article ( and great comments as usual ), concentrating only on Surface RT and its Windows ReTard operating system. The only thing I would add is that the author plays down the controversy with the use of "Windows" label, which we know from other stories that Ballmer intentionally decided to use the name in spite of warnings from others. It is intentional deception. Microsoft is just out from underneath the last government action, they just recently experienced pushback with Vista and its own "Windows Ready" labeling fiasco yet they have doubled down and exceeded that one by a mile. Ballmer is just asking for FTC or DoJ scrutiny, and he would clearly deserve it.

While reading this, something occurred to me. A thousand posts ago many commenters here were pointing out the obvious that Microsoft had to tie "Windows" brand to Metro rather than create a separate distinct mobile operating system that might not be able to stand on its feet and die in the marketplace. We already knew this was a cynical ploy to convert its monopolistic desktop position into an Apple-esque walled garden. The right thing to do would have been a separate OS, and it would have acted as a firewall from contaminating "Windows" as a brand. So what suddenly dawned on me is that this Surface RT device is exactly an instance of that separate OS ( except for the re-use of the "Windows" brand ), and just as we warned it is failing or at best is on life support. Once again, the commenters here and many other places long before the RTM and general release correctly predicted what Microsoft and its presumably well-paid staff of designers, marketers, forecasters and evangelists could not see. As far as I can tell, the only people out of touch with the obvious future are working in Redmond and/or populating the comment sections of The Verge and NeoWin.

... Let him who hath understanding reckon the Number Of The Beast ...


#1554
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,244 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag


Maybe if MS paid me $40 -- or $200 -- then I might think about it...

You evidently greatly underestimate the price for giving away your moral integrity. :w00t: :ph34r:

jaclaz

LOL, what I had in mind with that sentence is to illustrate the fact that (from an economics perspective) for me Windows 8 has negative value. It's not just worthless (zero value), it's actually worse than nothing.

Eventually, Microsoft may start bragging about the hundreds of millions of Win8 "sales." But there's a conceptual problem with this: when a unit comes as part of a larger bundle (the PC), it's hard to tease out the actual value of the individual parts of the bundle.

Years ago I worked at a company that published a monthly guide for cable television. The guide came as part of the subscription. One time, as a test the publisher arranged with several cable companies to offer subscribers the choice of paying either X amount for their current channel lineup plus the magazine, or (X - Y) amount for the channels only. IIRC, the difference was around $1.50 a month.

When the results came back, something like 9 percent of the cable subscribers who'd been given the choice had opted to pay for the magazine. :blushing: Not exactly a ringing endorsement!

The same logic applies to Windows 8. Because it comes (mainly) as part of a package, it's harder for the market to establish the OS's actual value.

--JorgeA

#1555
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,244 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Out of this article (nice preview of the "real thing") found through one of the above links :thumbup :
http://www.pcworld.c...s-from-ces.html

I would like to highlight part of this sentence:

Regardless, the pen itself performed relatively well when drawing in digital ink. There was the slightest—slightest—bit of lag in drawing response, but while it was noticeable, it wasn’t consequential. Microsoft couldn’t tell me how many levels of pressure sensitivity are offered by the pen, but simply having a full-fledged Windows tablet that can get close to a Wacom pad is a nice bonus feature.


We are talking of a "closed doors" preview offered at CES 2013 to a technical writer of one of the most influential PC magazines in the US, preview being patronized DIRECTLY by Microsoft, and the guys/gals there cannot answer to a "plain enough" technical question? :unsure:

There is no reference to that question being asked as a "test" with no possibility for the MS representatives there to "phone home" and get the answer, apparently besides not knowing straight away the answer to a "normal" question (VERY normal when you are offering a preview on a pen-based tablet) they seemingly did not have the capabilities (or the will) to get it from some of the engineers (that SHOULD know it).
I would like to underline the fact that in this case it is not "third party" hardware .... :whistle:

Redmond, we have a problem. :ph34r:

jaclaz

This is just mind-boggling. How could they not know?? Or maybe they didn't want to say. :blushing:

Nice catch, jaclaz!

--JorgeA

#1556
jaclaz

jaclaz

    The Finder

  • Developer
  • 14,593 posts
  • Joined 23-July 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

One time, as a test the publisher arranged with several cable companies to offer subscribers the choice of paying either X amount for their current channel lineup plus the magazine, or (X - Y) amount for the channels only. IIRC, the difference was around $1.50 a month.

When the results came back, something like 9 percent of the cable subscribers who'd been given the choice had opted to pay for the magazine. :blushing: Not exactly a ringing endorsement!


Not only this is "obvious" but i is EXACTLY the reason WHY nowadays things come most often as "a bundle".

Take my mobile phone bill as an example.

I have (and rest assured it is the "best" - i.e. "cheaper" - possible "contract" available here given my needs) for a "flat monthly fee":
  • 180 min conversation
  • 500 sms
  • 100 mms
  • 2 Gb (or more, cannot remember right now) download
  • 2 phone numbers (wife+office) unlimited conversation

Typically I use 70% or 80% of the "third party conversations", 10% at the most SMS, 0% MMS and maybe 5% of the internet connection.
I would gladly change this to a non-flat, IF there was something cheaper with no sms or mms nor fixed-amount of included Internet connection where I could have still the two unlimited phone numbers for a "base fee" and a decent fee for each sms and "third party conversation".
Too bad that such tariffs/contracts do not exist (and this is by design).
It's just like gambling (the casino will win), the telephone company pays (dearly) experts that look at the "effective" use of the phone by their customers and "design" bundles in such a way that the phone company will get more money in exchange of "nothing" (services NOT provided as they are not actually used/required by the customer).

In a time where any non-moron user would like to pay whatever goods or service per item, every company is going for "bundles".

I would like to take my car to the workshop and pay for the work that is actually needed (and done) on my car, but I am offered a "bundle" for three years of maintenance included in the price of the car.
I would like to have just 5 or 6 (these are the ones I actually watch) Satellite TV channels, but I have to subscribe to a "bundle" with 20 of them, 10 of which I NEVER watch (and I would gladly pay per view in the rare cases where I want to watch something on the remaining 4 or 5).
I want to book a hotel to stay in on a trip, but what I am offered is a "bundle" with a flight and with "all inclusive" arrangement (while I want to have just breakfast and be free to lunch and dine where I choose to). And NO, I don't want the "typical local dinner and music dance show" which is also included in the packet. :no:

This is another way to subtract knowledge :ph34r: to the public, by proposing "bundles" the value of the single items composing them is hidden (and eventually lost).

In italian there is (rectius was) a science called "merceologia" that translates to English as "study of commodities" that has been effectively killed over the years by industry (basically removing the knowledge on how to make - or repair * yourself something that the industries produce)

With Windows you have (though flawed) still some means of establishing how much is the value (cost) of the software and how much it is that of the hardware, but what about the good Apple guys?
How much of the awful amount of money they ask (and BTW obtain) for a device such as the iPad is for the hardware and how much is for the iOS bundled with it? :unsure:


jaclaz

#1557
CharlotteTheHarlot

CharlotteTheHarlot

    MSFN Master

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,054 posts
  • Joined 24-September 07
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Fact Check: Windows 8 Pricing Identical to That for Windows 7 ( Thurrott 2013-01-19 )

His actual subtitle ... There's been a lot of whining this week. It's all unnecessary

Thurrott writes another article intent on convincing everyone that he is almost as blind and deaf as Baller, Julie and Jensen. Hey Paul, it's okay, I'm convinced.

In the wake of this week’s announcement about pending changes to Windows 8 upgrade pricing, there’s been a lot of outrage about Microsoft “jacking up” the price of the new OS. But here’s a shocker: Windows 8 will soon cost exactly the same as Windows 7 did before it. So instead of looking at this as some kind of disaster, why not just appreciate the months of low-cost upgrades we’ve received?


Ya know, I don't remember ever thinking that all those crazy SKUs and high prices were a good thing. I actually believed they were outrageous as they target the most loyal and experienced of Microsoft Windows customers - that small percentage of people that get their hands dirty building their own computers and who are intentionally buying Windows, as opposed to the n00bs and that only get windows because it came with a computer. It is still ironic to me that Microsoft would punish with extreme prices their best and possibly their only voluntary customers. Yet Paul is unhappy because he must have read some of the tech blog community who are universally stunned about a price increase on a controversial operating system ...

The reaction? Again: Outrage. How dare Microsoft make Windows 8 Pro available so cheaply for a pre-set period of time and then simply begin pricing it normally exactly when they previously announced they would do so. How dare they!

Folks, please.

Fact is, with the one exception of Windows 7, which artificially benefitted from a poor reception to its predecessor, virtually no one upgrades their own PCs from one version of Windows to the next. It’s fair to say that almost everyone who wanted to take advantage of the promo pricing on the Windows 8 Pro Upgrade already did so.

So what’s with the outrage?


That emphasized sentence is another humdinger of a pull quote sure to make the rounds as a classic. It is right up there with "The Desktop Must Die!". :lol:

Anyway, Paul, you're right. These insanely high prices are a good thing. We should be thanking them. Thank you Microsoft.


Why MS is raising the price on Windows 8 ( TechBroil 2013-01-20 )

This great blog and many of the commenters around the net are pointing out facts about with they would follow through with this price increase. It should drum up a spike in sales for Q1 of this year.

But there may even be another reason. You gotta wonder how many people are going to buy the $39 upgrade just to turn around and sell it later at 2x or 3x the cost. I mean, think about it. When was the last time you saw a sure thing? In stock market transactions, everyone thought the Facebook IPO might be one. It wasn't. Certainly buying shares of MSFT or most others has been anything other than a sure-thing. But here we actually have such a beast, an absolute, positively, no-doubt-whatsoever sure-thing. It is pretty safe to say that sales are going to spike now and then drop off the cliff as eBay picks up the slack later. I sure hope Microsoft is not involved in this thing, like when "Classic Coke" was rumored to be a huge sales ploy. That might just lead to big legal trouble.


EDIT: added link

Edited by CharlotteTheHarlot, 20 January 2013 - 03:26 PM.

... Let him who hath understanding reckon the Number Of The Beast ...


#1558
CharlotteTheHarlot

CharlotteTheHarlot

    MSFN Master

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,054 posts
  • Joined 24-September 07
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
WinInfo Short Takes, January 18, 2013 ( Thurrott at WindowsITPro 2013-01-18 )

Another Thurrott article, with two interesting paragraphs ...

On the Good News Front…

So, it’s going to be an interesting year. But I actually see a future in which Intel does the same thing to Qualcomm and the broader ARM industry that it did previously to AMD. You might recall that AMD got a boost a decade ago when it created what’s now called the x64 instruction set, adding 64-bit capabilities to the aging x86 chipset and ushering it into the modern age. That boost came courtesy of Microsoft, which immediately seized on x64 as the superior alternative to Intel’s ridiculous Itanium product, and supported it natively in Windows. So Intel was forced to sign on, and as x64 really took off, Intel left AMD in the dust with superior chips. Intel could do the same thing to ARM, though it’s going to have to move a lot more quickly than it has so far. Its Atom “Clover Trail” is already superior to today’s ARM chipsets in virtually every way imaginable, but Intel needs to get the battery life and cool temperatures of this design into faster, more powerful Core chipsets. And that won’t happen until late 2013. Will that be fast enough? Like I said—interesting year.


A little sloppy there with the words. AMD didn't so much create the x64 instruction set, it certainly implemented it first. Using larger register sizes that are completely backwards compatible are an extension, not an invention, it is implemented, not created. Yes, Itanium is a "walled garden" attempt and a deviation, however, "That boost came courtesy of Microsoft, which immediately seized on x64" is more fanboyism. They also seized on Itanium. Most importantly, since AMD64 aka x64 aka x86-64 aka IA-32e aka EM64T ( or simply: x86 +64-bit ) is an almost perfectly implemented backward compatible extension ( Wiki ), Microsoft is the one to BLAME for the incompatibilities seen by the enduser such as 16-bit and other planned obsolescence. They chose with their compilers and system file design to add bugs that a more perfect and conscientious company would have not allowed. Paul, you really had no reason to inject Microsoft into that paragraph about CPU architecture, you just can't help yourself from knee-jerk fanboyism.

ADDED: I wonder if Intel has thought about simply making a compound architecture CPU. Perhaps with four x86 cores and two ARM cores. The operating system could be developed in two editions, Desktop x86 or Mobile ARM. The desktop edition would be x86 bound and direct windowed ARM apps to the ARM cores, vice versa for mobile. Simple. Consider that copyrighted.


Surface Controls 82 Percent of a Completely Pointless Market

The good news: Microsoft Surface with Windows RT represents about 82 percent of the market for Windows RT devices, according to the market researchers at AdDuplex. But then there’s the bad: The same firm says that Windows RT represents just 9 percent of all Windows 8 usage worldwide, and a separate firm, UBS AG, says that it believes Microsoft has sold just 1 million Surface with Windows RT tablets so far. So … doing a little math, we find that total Windows RT sales are approximately 1.2 million units. And if that’s 9 percent of all Windows 8 usage, then there are possibly 13.5 million people using Windows 8 overall right now. I think. That number is a far cry from the 60 million Windows 8 licenses sold and is flawed for about a hundred reasons—those numbers I’m using are essentially made up and are completely unrelated, for starters. But that’s the point. Anyone can throw out numbers. The real proof in the pudding, so to speak, will happen when and if Microsoft reveals actual Surface sales next week. I bet they don’t do it.


Impressive numbers! Now divide that by three or four to account for the reduced price and we have 3 to 4 million similar "sales" comparable to Windows 7 or XP. I'm wondering about something Paul, do you still think it was a great idea to tamper with and permanently damage the "Windows" brand with the stench that is Windows 8 and Metro? Was that transparent and cynical ploy to exploit their monopolistic position a smart or ethical move?

EDIT: added an idea for Intel.

Edited by CharlotteTheHarlot, 20 January 2013 - 09:50 PM.

... Let him who hath understanding reckon the Number Of The Beast ...


#1559
CharlotteTheHarlot

CharlotteTheHarlot

    MSFN Master

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,054 posts
  • Joined 24-September 07
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Microsoft hires designer who presented bold revamp of the company's brand ( The Verge 2013-01-19 )

Microsoft hires man who made his own Microsoft product logos ( NeoWin 2013-01-20 )

Microsoft has hired the guy from Minimally Minimal called Andrew Kim in order to further dumb down their already dumbed down image. See his Next Microsoft page that apparently caught their attention ( and in his defense does have some accurate criticism of Microsoft trends ). But overall, his great contribution to the world of modern art is the use of a parallelogram, or several in combination. He really should fit right in with the other professional under-achievers like Ballmer, Julie and Jensen.

Spoiler



EDIT: typos, updated image URL, and again

Edited by CharlotteTheHarlot, 06 May 2013 - 06:29 PM.

... Let him who hath understanding reckon the Number Of The Beast ...


#1560
jaclaz

jaclaz

    The Finder

  • Developer
  • 14,593 posts
  • Joined 23-July 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Occam's razor. :w00t:
A simpler exlanation is that his dog ate all the other pieces of his tangram and he was left with just the "slate" (or "romboid").
BTW his dog also seemingly ate in the past 16,777,215 of his colours, leaving him with ONLY a light blue/turquoise. http://en.wikipedia....urquoise_(color)


jaclaz

#1561
CharlotteTheHarlot

CharlotteTheHarlot

    MSFN Master

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,054 posts
  • Joined 24-September 07
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Sinofsky is back with his fourth blog post, and finally we agree on something! This post addresses the recent dust-up in Twitter and blogs about Sinofsky using an iPhone ...

Learning from Competition ( Sinofsky 2013-01-14 )

Learning from the competition is not just required of all product development folks, but can also be somewhat of a skill worth honing. Let’s look at the ins and outs of using a competitive product.

Why?

Obviously you should use a competitive product. You should know what you’re up against when a consumer (or business) ultimately faces a buying decision. They will weigh a wide array of factors and you should be aware of those not only for the purposes of sales and marketing but when you are designing your products.


This is in sharp contrast to the attitude of Gates mentioned in stories just a few weeks ago ...

Bill Gates still won't let his children use Apple products ( NeoWin 2012-12-28 )

All kinds of "Yay Bill" and other rationalizations. No-one evens considers the possibility of someone in the position of billg, with the limitless means of billg, simply getting one of each and every make and model of device and comparing them objectively. I mean, he might notice something and phone up the team and say "How come we can't do this or that like so and so?". Actually, if you know anything about the early years with billg you would already know that he has done exactly that in the past and it is part of his legend as being plugged-in to all levels. This alleged no-Apple rule of his might be simply to avert criticism of stealing ideas and whatnot, but it certainly shows a shift to insular and walled-in thinking at the highest levels.

Now we need to wonder if the insular thinking is actually cemented in place at Microsoft due to Gates permanent presence and his disconnect from actual product development, and is being advanced by his handpicked Mini-Me Steve Ballmer. It sure looks like Sinofsky is going to slowly redeem his image through his blog posts even though he carefully avoids direct references to Microsoft ( The Gates story does not appear in the blog ).

Photograph of Gates' "Mini-Me" Steve Ballmer ...

Spoiler


EDIT: typos

Edited by CharlotteTheHarlot, 20 January 2013 - 02:53 PM.

... Let him who hath understanding reckon the Number Of The Beast ...


#1562
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,244 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Photograph of Gates' "Mini-Me" Steve Ballmer ...

:D :lol: :thumbup :lol:

--JorgeA

#1563
JorgeA

JorgeA

    FORMAT B: /V /S

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 3,244 posts
  • Joined 08-April 10
  • OS:Vista Home Premium x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Occam's razor. :w00t:
A simpler exlanation is that his dog ate all the other pieces of his tangram and he was left with just the "slate" (or "romboid").
BTW his dog also seemingly ate in the past 16,777,215 of his colours, leaving him with ONLY a light blue/turquoise. http://en.wikipedia....urquoise_(color)

Your discussion over this with @Charlotte made me think of something. Consider how everything Microsoft is suddenly becoming simpler in design -- now down to the point where the logo is a single color and barely any interior lines. Now consider how Microsoft is pushing this concept of the "consumption" device. I wonder whether this is intended to reflect (or promote :ph34r: ) the growing atrophy of users' brain cells as they incessantly surf the Web and mindlessly go clicking from video to video, to where their minds can't even process multicolor logos or -- gasp! -- windows with rounded corners and 3D buttons.

I could imagine a biting TV take on Microsoft's Surface (and the Apple iPad) featuring cavemen (real primitive ones, not the sophisticated GEICO cavemen) really getting into a tablet with their grubby fat fingers...

--JorgeA

#1564
CharlotteTheHarlot

CharlotteTheHarlot

    MSFN Master

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,054 posts
  • Joined 24-September 07
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Consider how everything Microsoft is suddenly becoming simpler in design ...

You gave me an idea for a new, more specific thread about this.

... Let him who hath understanding reckon the Number Of The Beast ...


#1565
CharlotteTheHarlot

CharlotteTheHarlot

    MSFN Master

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,054 posts
  • Joined 24-September 07
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Net Applications: Windows 8 keeps gaining market share ( NeoWin 2013-01-21 )

For the month of December, Net Applications said that its data showed that Windows 8 was running on 1.64 percent of all PCs worldwide, two months after its launch. Now, new data taken just over two weeks later shows a big growth in the use of Windows 8.

The new data, taken from the week of January 16, shows Windows 8 running on 2.25 percent on all PCs, with two offshoots (Windows 8 Touch and Windows 8 RT Touch) adding another 0.08 percent to that marketshare. Windows 8 is now closing in on Mac OS 10.8, which currently has a 2.43 percent share of the PC OS market.


Yes, he went there ... 1.64 percent ... big growth ... 2.25 percent.


Back in Post #1358 we found this ...

Surface makes a small blip on the web traffic radar ( NeoWin 2012-12-11 )

In a nut shell, the Surface took .13% of the web traffic generated from the ad impressions across the Chitika network while Android took .91% of the market; Chitika states the sample base was in the tens of millions.


That is a decimal point there in that 0.13 % or less than one seventh of one percent. Yeah, it doesn't mean much now. And there is no doubt that Windows 8 ( of which Surface represents only a subset ) itself will chart eventually. I mean how can it not? The user market is much larger now than six years ago, and they are literally forcing it into the world through the OEM channels ( again ). Plus, now we have billions of phones also. The real question is whether it will get as high as Vista did ( I believe it was 20% at it's peak ) before the bottom drops out once and for all.

http://en.wikipedia....OS_market_share ... 2012-12-12 ... Windows 7 = 41.35% ... Windows XP = 21.29% ... Windows 8 = 0.32%



Unfortunately at that same Wiki page, they have changed things around, and I don't see an overall statistic like they had back on 2012-12-12. :} ( way to go guys ). No way for a comparison that I can see yet. This is what they currently show on the top two main charts ...

--------------- Net Applications --- Wikimedia
---------------- December 2012 ---- October 2012
Windows 7 .......... 45.11 ........... 41.35
Windows XP ......... 39.08 ........... 21.29
Mac OSX ............. 7.05 ............ 8.54
Windows Vista ....... 5.67 ............ 6.28
Windows 8 ........... 1.72 ............ 0.32
Linux ............... 1.19 ............ 1.64
Other ............... 0.18 ............ 5.84
iOS ................................... 9.46
Android ............................... 4.80
Windows RT + WP ....................... 0.48


If the page format remains the same after the next update then we can use this snapshot for a direct comparison.

... Let him who hath understanding reckon the Number Of The Beast ...


#1566
Formfiller

Formfiller

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Joined 03-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Net Applications: Windows 8 keeps gaining market share ( NeoWin 2013-01-21 )

For the month of December, Net Applications said that its data showed that Windows 8 was running on 1.64 percent of all PCs worldwide, two months after its launch. Now, new data taken just over two weeks later shows a big growth in the use of Windows 8.

The new data, taken from the week of January 16, shows Windows 8 running on 2.25 percent on all PCs, with two offshoots (Windows 8 Touch and Windows 8 RT Touch) adding another 0.08 percent to that marketshare. Windows 8 is now closing in on Mac OS 10.8, which currently has a 2.43 percent share of the PC OS market.


Yes, he went there ... 1.64 percent ... big growth ... 2.25 percent.



Many people have turned on their new W8 PCs/laptops that they got for Christmas only in January. Also, gifting money and shopping coupons became quite popular as well. Some have bought computers for that money after Christmas. After January, this post-Christmas effect will wear off, thus W8 will grow far slower in the next months. Since MS wants to raise W8 upgrade prices, upgrades to W8 will decrease very heavily as well.

#1567
Formfiller

Formfiller

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Joined 03-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Oh, I can't believe that these idiots at Neowin are actually excited about W8 surpassing Linux.. How deluded are those dumbf..?

Desktop Linux lingers at around 1% since over twenty years. An MS OS surpassing that is nothing exciting. They could re-relase Windows 98 and it would most likely surpass Linux marketshare as well.

#1568
MagicAndre1981

MagicAndre1981

    after Windows 7 GA still Vista lover :)

  • Patrons
  • 6,105 posts
  • Joined 28-August 05
  • OS:Vista Ultimate x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

neowin = Fan boy central. Ignore the trolls there.
Posted Image

#1569
ricktendo

ricktendo

    Group: Banned Members

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,309 posts
  • Joined 06-June 06
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

neowin = Fan boy central. Ignore the trolls there.

Fan boy, I give you that but not trolls. Look up the definition of troll and you will find a link to this topic (not really, trying to make a point)

#1570
Win2k3EE

Win2k3EE

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 222 posts
  • Joined 15-May 05
Seeing StartIsBack and start menu clones out there, it made me wanting to install Windows 8 Pro. But afterwards, an idea came into my mind already set to wipe out the Windows 7 Ultimate installation and to install Win8 Pro. Why do I need Win8 Pro? Why should I switch? Well, maybe I'm too relaxed with Win7 and I need some agitation with Win8. So, in the end I decided to stay with Windows 7. For me, Windows 8 doesn't offer anything much - maybe except the agitation and the stress of customization of Windows 8 to look & feel like Windows 7.
Office 2013? Same argument as in regard of Win8. There's nothing new that I can't do with Office 2010.
I have and "old" desktop equipped with an AMD Barton 2500+ (running stable for years at 2500 MHz) that's running Win2003 Server and Office 2007 and I don't see any reason to "upgrade".

Once, I sought in an OS beauty and bling-bling - but today I want speed & beauty and Windows 7 delivers that very well, when Windows 8 doesn't at all, so I won't change just for the sake of changing.

#1571
ciHnoN

ciHnoN

    Member

  • Banned
  • PipPip
  • 153 posts
  • Joined 22-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Excellent thread. Took me a while to read it, well I managed to read half of it or something. I registered here just to be able to reply to this thread. This place seems like a nice place, a lot of non-zombie people here it seems, which is a breath of fresh air for once. A lot of crap out there but in this place I felt there are not angry rants but rather good arguments against Windows 8 so I thought, what the heck, I'll join!

This reply is specifically made towards "CharlotteTheHarlot" with the odd and fun nickname, however. You are spot on and thank you for writing all those wonderful posts. I enjoyed reading them.

Sorry for posting a little off topic reply, I'll post again with my thoughts on this... thing... Windows 8. :angel

Cheers!

EDIT: Fixed spelling.

Edited by NonHic, 22 January 2013 - 02:58 AM.

He who laughs has not yet heard the bad news.

#1572
CharlotteTheHarlot

CharlotteTheHarlot

    MSFN Master

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,054 posts
  • Joined 24-September 07
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
There must be a hundred stories out there about the imminent Windows 8 price increase, and with them are literally thousands of comments, almost all are ripping Microsoft a new one for yet another huge mistake ( hehe, well all except Thurrott: There's been a lot of whining this week. It's all unnecessary :lol: ). Here is the official Microsoft PR hack webpage ...

Update on Windows 8 Pricing ( Brandon LeBlanc 2013-01-18 )

Normally I would quote him, but you really have to read the IBM Microsoft marketspeak for yourself and marvel at the enormous mess they have made of this. What is interesting is that the majority of the comments at this Microsoft blog are authored by Windows 8 supporters and Microsoft sycophants and I can only find a single one that blindly supports this complicated, confusing and irrational mess as a good thing. The bulk of the commenters are incredulous at the pricing plan and also the ridiculously complex SKU editions.

As we have come to expect from this lumbering behemoth IBM Microsoft, Brandon chooses to respond to one single comment, where the person expressed his frustration like this: "I also love WIndows 8, so it saddens me that what's going to kill it is the horrible marketing and messaging around it. First of all, nobody's going to pay $200 for it. Secondly, the entire article above is INCREDIBLY CONFUSING. Why?!? Nowhere on this page or any of the linked articles can I find a description of the differences between "Windows 8" and "Windows 8 Pro" or the others. What are you doing? If you wanted to take a great product and ensure its demise, I can't think of a better way.". And what does he do, he sends the poor confused customer to an even less-helpful marketdroid page which starts off like this ...

Which Windows is right for you?

Both Windows 8 and Windows RT offer a beautiful, fast, and fluid interface that you can personalize with the people, apps, and sites you care about most. They’re designed for touch, mouse, and keyboard.


There really seems to be no hope for this company. :no: Great comment that cuts right to the chase: "For the price of the upgrade you can get an Android tablet... oh, wait, that's what people are doing!" :yes:


Over at ComputerWorld an example of the kind of press they are receiving ...

Microsoft to raise Windows 8 upgrade prices by 5X ( ComputerWorld 2013-01-19 )

I believe this one particular commenter has nailed the situation exactly right ... "Windows is now a declining market. It makes economic sense to increase the rents as lowering price will no longer get market share. I don't see the value in the Windows product and I look to avoid their lock in.". This may be their actual thinking now, convinced by bean-counters that they failed at adoption with a severely reduced price and now they must stop the bleeding.

Other poster have witty comments, some of my favorites ...

  • "Wow, what a great price that is. Must wipe PCLinuxOS off my harddrive straight away and buy a copy....."
  • "Now we are saving even more by not buying it."
  • "Like shooting a torpedo at the Titanic... "
  • "I'll bet MS brings back the start button on February 1st."
:lol:

EDIT: typo

Edited by CharlotteTheHarlot, 22 January 2013 - 04:14 AM.

... Let him who hath understanding reckon the Number Of The Beast ...


#1573
ciHnoN

ciHnoN

    Member

  • Banned
  • PipPip
  • 153 posts
  • Joined 22-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Here are some of my first thoughts on Windows 8 (and Microsoft). Will probably add more later.

I have used Microsoft software as long as I can remember from my first "PC" (IBM SX-25). One thing I always did was to trust them. Sure, everyone said this or that about them but inside Windows, you were kind'a free to roam. I never felt that Linux is free because due to its complexity, I never felt I could actually do what I wanted to do. It got in my way all the time, fix this or that, read this, and when asking from the guys who knew, I got "RTFM"! So it felt like a prison because I was always at the mercy of those "linux techies". Microsoft Windows due to its simplicity empowered me.

Microsoft Windows made it much easier so I could concentrate on what I actually needed to do on my PC. Note that I say my PC. With Windows 8, I no longer feel that this is "my" PC anymore. The same disgusting uneasy feeling I get from Android and OSX, I now get from Windows 8... I'll tell you why.

When buying an Android device or OSX, it's locked up. It is not your PC if you don't have administrator account on it. It is not your device if you cannot uninstall 3rd party crap from it. It is not your device when by default, there are a ton of applications on it which are there just to mine your data. Take your GPS position, contacts, and basically, it's their device you borrow. You can't even install a new version of the OS on these Android devices. Complete 100% locked. You rent it. This is not a buy, it's a rent. (rooting doesn't count)

Windows 8... they put this creepy thing called "Windows Marketplace", which is an absolute totally Orwellian word. They call something which is locked up (walled garden), which takes 30% of your profit and you must get approval from them a "Marketplace". No sir, that is no marketplace. War is not peace!

Windows 8... suddenly, they call the open desktop where you can do whatever you want with your PC "legacy". They want all programmers to write in WinRT and lock themselves inside this Orwellian "Marketplace".

So not only they want to take away 30% of your profit, they also want to dictate what you will be running on your PC. It must be "approved" by them. They have completely lost it. Who do they think they are at Microsoft?

Do you actually think that I would start making applications for your OS? Do you actually believe that I will be asking permission from idiots at Microsoft in order to be able to distribute MY application?

What did you say? Oh, I can't even make a WinRT application and give it to my dad or a friend? Oh, you need to approve this too? Well, up yours! You can take WinRT and put it where the sun don't shine!

Basically, what they have done is to make me... force me to not ever write one more single piece of software for Windows. I will not do it! I rather change my profession, do something else with my life than systemsdevelopment, than allow these b*st*rds at Microsoft to dictate what I can do with MY PC.

If a day comes where there no longer would be an option, you know what I would do? Trash the PC! Just like I did with my TV 14 years ago. I do not miss TV one bit and I will not miss PC one bit if it becomes a TV. What they are trying to do is to make PC like TV, very slowly turning up the heat on people without the frog jumping out of the pan. All this lock-in and cloud talk is just baby steps toward them becoming like car giants. Windows 8 is the first step toward this.

Now, if you are a real cynic, you could even take this one step further, this whole chaning the gUI of Windows 8, removing start menu and all is just a distraction! The real issue is not the start menu. The real major issue is the lock-in!!! The "must be approved" or we will not allow you to run it on your PC. They knew people would be super angry when they changed the start menu but that is exactly what they wanted. To distract you from the real issue, the lock-in!

I will post more later. My blood boils when I think of Windows 8 and I don't want to make this post into an angry rant.

Thanks for listening.
EDIT: Spellings.

Edited by NonHic, 22 January 2013 - 06:22 AM.

He who laughs has not yet heard the bad news.

#1574
CharlotteTheHarlot

CharlotteTheHarlot

    MSFN Master

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,054 posts
  • Joined 24-September 07
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Here are some of my first thoughts on Windows 8 (and Microsoft). Will probably add more later.

Well said. :thumbup

One thing they can't do is easily terminate the existing x86 universe. But they will try with many cold calculating steps. They will try to ease the millions of old shareware and freeware websites out of the picture. There will be pushback because to take away my personal computer desktop they will have to pry it from my cold dead fingers.

They will certainly continue utilizing their nearly captive OEM back channels to win by attrition. People need to rise up, directly contact OEMS and demand they make motherboard and device drivers for operating systems other than just Windows 8, including Windows 7 and XP, Linux and others. Throw the word "collusion" around, because it is very accurate. Warn OEMs not to collude with Microsoft because it is a crime. USA residents should contact their two Senators and House member, as well as their State reps and Attorney Generals and demand Microsoft be broken up because their monopoly now dwarfs that of Rockefeller and all of the past monopolists. They are trying to lock down the system now, and there is a short window of opportunity to halt them.

Two years ago this sounded like a conspiracy theory. A year ago they dropped the Start Menu and proceeded forward anyway despite near unanimous criticism. They have not shown a single sign of accommodation and no evidence exists to contradict this theory that they are morphing into a cheap sleazy knockoff of Apple. I stayed out of the Apple universe because I cannot stand the patronizing, heavy-handed control freaks that they are. I won't let it happen to Microsoft without putting up one hell of a fight.

... Let him who hath understanding reckon the Number Of The Beast ...


#1575
ciHnoN

ciHnoN

    Member

  • Banned
  • PipPip
  • 153 posts
  • Joined 22-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

...There will be pushback because to take away my personal computer desktop they will have to pry it from my cold dead fingers.


:wub:


...although, the issue is that all those senators and OEMs do work together. They are all in each others' pockets. I work as a systemsdeveloper at a very large international corporation which sells hardware. I am inside a lot of meetings and I have full access to our systems. I see it all, everyday, how manufacturers con people consumers. It is all the good'ol boys' club, me and you (we the people) are not invited.

The thing is, it does not matter anymore to me personally if they fix this with a 8.1 update or learn a lesson by the time Windows 9 is out. The trust I had on Microsoft is gone. I will no longer produce software for Windows. That is the first step I have taken toward this. I will not develop any more software.

I will create websites only, using W3C standard.

Will also try to minimize my exposure and dependency not only to Windows but the OS itself as a whole. Ubuntu Linux is also doing very odd things which I won't bring here because it's off topic.

----------

On anothe note, the "charms bar" which is faaar from anything charming is also very creepy. Try closing a maximized window without making it pop 7 out of 10 times... and not to mention the forced icon "share" in it. Desktop/PC is a PERSONAL PRIVATE PC. I do not want a share function built-in to the OS! Where did my privacy go? The kids have been so conditioned, the xbox/facebook generation that all hope seems lost right now.

----------

They even hide control panel. Do you know how hard it is to find that thing? Bring up explorer from desktop, click on the desktop icon and THEN one will see it! WHAT THE HELL? It is clear that they are doing away with all sorts of customization and control for the end user. They are taking over. Lock, stock and barrel.

I have found a way to kill off the "start screen" once in desktop without using an extra 3rd party application always running, which is nice. I do not dare to mention it here, however. I'm afraid they change it in an update! *lol*

And why did the aero go away? It is amazing how many zombies for example in neowin, not only actually like this but also defend the notion that Microsoft did NOT give us who like aero an option to turn it on!!! Dictatorial zombies are the worst zombies. Clearly the gUI is still hardware accelerated and in the previews aero was there. Not offering an option is another insult to their userbase. ...but I'm sure it is all a distraction. They needed something very big, a huge distraction so people forget about the lock-in which is coming into the playfield.

Sadly, they seem to have succeeded so far. I wish people did not use Windows 8 instead of installing it and buy StartIsBack or Start8. All of those who did it clearly dislike the "start screen" but yet, they use Windows 8. If all of them, millions of people had just say "No", Microsoft would have changed this in a second!!!

But for me personally, me, who always defended Microsoft, who always trusted them... the line in sand is drawn now. Microsoft, remember Job 38:11 ..."This far you may come and no farther."


He who laughs has not yet heard the bad news.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users