Aloha, on 13 May 2012 - 11:58 PM, said:
You are very good at picking out parts of what I said
I didn't really pick parts. I pretty much quoted the entire thing line by line (not that I see anything wrong with just commenting on the interesting parts either). It just makes it easier to see what one is replying to. It's very much the same thing as MagicAndre1981 said, just written in a more "structured" way.
Aloha, on 13 May 2012 - 11:58 PM, said:
You don't need to object it one by one
I see no harm in doing so either (it's a forum, where people can have and express opinions, you know -- just like bphlpt explained before). It's not like we're trying to convince you or anything. We're just just voicing opinions. All we're saying is that it brings very, very little outside of Metro (not that Metro is a good thing). And most of that is matched or even surpassed by freeware. Feel free to disagree altogether with everything I said.
Aloha, on 13 May 2012 - 11:58 PM, said:
And maybe the above features are only nice to me. They might be a disaster or just a fiddle-faddle to the others
That's about the only sentence I hadn't quoted (I didn't see the point of it). But yes, that's pretty much the case according to a lot of people.
Aloha, on 13 May 2012 - 11:58 PM, said:
I am not a kid eager for changing the desktop wallpaper every 15 minutes
I don't see why not. Nice new pics every time you peek at the desktop. You get to enjoy more awesome pics that way too (I have about 2000 of them in a folder that are on rotation). Everyone at work keeps asking about them. It's also a great way to get rid of some of the lesser ones (I have a shortcut that deletes the not-so-great ones in 2 clicks so they're never seen again, leaving you with only the absolute best stuff -- it's less work to sort them this way too). It's like a slow-paced slideshow of awesome photos. It's less of a hassle to have it change them automatically than manually changing them yourself. I'd never go back.
Aloha, on 13 May 2012 - 11:58 PM, said:
the automatic theme has served this purpose perfectly therein, don't you think so?
I can't quite grasp what you meant there. Sorry.