Problems with KB2564958 integration problems
#1
Posted 15 April 2012 - 03:20 PM
I'm using updates form-X- package and simply couldn't integrate hotfix KB2564958 for/in Windows XP x86.
I've tried to use nLite or Rvm.
Every time when I "test" Windows through Virtual BOX, Windows Update reports that hotfix as available for installation.
First, there was a problem with the name of hotfix. Mistake from M-Soft.
After that, problem was the same.
Any solutions, opinions please???
#2
Posted 15 April 2012 - 06:19 PM
That update runs from svcpack so there should be an entry in add-remove programs when show updates is checked. Can you confirm?
Also check for uiautomationcore.dll in system32
#3
Posted 18 April 2012 - 01:28 AM
-X-, on 15 April 2012 - 06:19 PM, said:
That update runs from svcpack so there should be an entry in add-remove programs when show updates is checked. Can you confirm?
Also check for uiautomationcore.dll in system32
You didn't understand. Using nLite, KB2564958 WON'T integrate into Windows at all.
Every other hotfix from YOUR package is integrated, only that (KB2564958) is making problem.
#4
Posted 18 April 2012 - 03:17 AM
Can you attach your last session.ini
Download it again and replace the one you have been using. http://download.micr...958-X86-ENU.exe
#5
Posted 18 April 2012 - 04:07 AM
-X-, on 18 April 2012 - 03:17 AM, said:
Can you attach your last session.ini
Download it again and replace the one you have been using. http://download.micr...958-X86-ENU.exe
No errors reported.
That one you gave me is identical with the one that I have. I've downloaded that hotfix at least 100 times.
nLite says after integration: The installation grew 0,01MB.
Right now, I'm going to install VirtualBOX and test that Windows.
I'm slipstreaming these hotfixes, in 3 or 4 sessions.






Btw, I'm using Windows XP SP3 clean for integration of hotfixes.
At first, that was ONLY Windows XP.
I've slipstreamed SP1, than SP2 and SP3 at the end.
Attached File(s)
-
Last Session.ini (2.14K)
Number of downloads: 5
This post has been edited by Yzöwl: 05 May 2013 - 03:33 PM
#6
Posted 18 April 2012 - 06:23 AM
You only need to integrate SP3 not 1, 2, and 3. SP3 has everything in 1 and 2.
Look in your i386 folder for a file named SVCPACK.IN_. Please attach it to your next post. Also look for uiautomationcore.dll, oleacc.dll and oleaccrc.dll in your i386 folder.
Quote
#7
Posted 18 April 2012 - 01:07 PM
-X-, on 18 April 2012 - 06:23 AM, said:
You only need to integrate SP3 not 1, 2, and 3. SP3 has everything in 1 and 2.
I have that Windows 9 years. SP2 was not available back than. So, I've slipstreamed Sp1, than Sp2 and in 2008 Sp3.
-X-, on 18 April 2012 - 06:23 AM, said:
All three files are in RAR.
Download from here http://www.mediafire...554ki5v1ppad7k.
By the way, I'm integrating files in 3 sessions.
I've separated hotfixes on those with NON DIRECT integration and others. Only that.
Dx, DotNET and others are also integrated after hotfixes.
This post has been edited by Killjoy: 18 April 2012 - 01:10 PM
#8
Posted 18 April 2012 - 06:07 PM
svcpack.inf
Quote
kb942288-v3.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3qfe
kb971513.exe /q /n /z /o
kb898461.exe /q /n /z /o
KB973685.EXE /quiet
kb2570947.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3gdr
kb2603381.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3gdr
kb2633952.exe /q /n /z /o
kb2661637.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3gdr
kb2647518.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3gdr
directx32.exe
WUA.exe /quiet /norestart
AVC89.EXE -gm2 -ai
AVC10.EXE -gm2 -ai
There should be a kb2564958.exe /q /n /z /o line there along with the binary, KB2564958.exe, in the svcpack folder.
Start over with a fresh copy of your XP source and do everything in one go and check that those 2 things are there.
#9
Posted 18 April 2012 - 06:38 PM
-X-, on 18 April 2012 - 06:07 PM, said:
svcpack.inf
Quote
kb942288-v3.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3qfe
kb971513.exe /q /n /z /o
kb898461.exe /q /n /z /o
KB973685.EXE /quiet
kb2570947.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3gdr
kb2603381.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3gdr
kb2633952.exe /q /n /z /o
kb2661637.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3gdr
kb2647518.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3gdr
directx32.exe
WUA.exe /quiet /norestart
AVC89.EXE -gm2 -ai
AVC10.EXE -gm2 -ai
There should be a kb2564958.exe /q /n /z /o line there along with the binary, KB2564958.exe, in the svcpack folder.
Start over with a fresh copy of your XP source and do everything in one go and check that those 2 things are there.
You already told me about that here.
Fresh copy??? Where da hell should I find fresh copy of XP???
I have XP with SP3. Only that. My original disk is destroyed long time ago.
What do I have to do?
Trying to find "PURE" XP online??? You must be joking.
I'll try with the one I have.
EDIT:
Success!!! Only if I integrate that hotfix, not with the others, it's working. Installation grew 1,35MB.
But IF I integrate along with the others, that little prick is making problems.
STUPID Microsoft!!! Tnx man!
EDIT:
More problems on the way. Some hotfixes reporting something like "file is not present in ISO to be updated" etc.
Before fixing the problem with KB2564958, I didn't have problems with other hotfixes.
Btw, there are some conflicts between some hotfixes.
I'll try again all over from the beggining and post problems in pictures.
I MUST put some hotfixes in separate folder because in you "package" you don't have all of them, only "high risk" hotfixes, for example 971513.
You should check this out.






This post has been edited by Yzöwl: 05 May 2013 - 03:35 PM
#10
Posted 18 April 2012 - 08:21 PM
#11
Posted 18 April 2012 - 08:55 PM
Killjoy, on 18 April 2012 - 07:19 PM, said:
You should check this out.
Those dialogs are expected. nLite is simply complaining that either (1) the file in the patch is not present in the CD, or (2) the file in the CD is newer than the patch.
EDIT: Wait a minute! Killjoy, you don't need the KB971513 as it was replaced by KB2564958. Remove KB971513 and you'll fix your problem.
This post has been edited by Explorer09: 18 April 2012 - 09:02 PM
#12
Posted 18 April 2012 - 09:15 PM
#13
Posted 18 April 2012 - 10:29 PM
Explorer09, on 18 April 2012 - 08:55 PM, said:
Killjoy, on 18 April 2012 - 07:19 PM, said:
You should check this out.
Those dialogs are expected. nLite is simply complaining that either (1) the file in the patch is not present in the CD, or (2) the file in the CD is newer than the patch.
EDIT: Wait a minute! Killjoy, you don't need the KB971513 as it was replaced by KB2564958. Remove KB971513 and you'll fix your problem.
Really? I'll try. Tnx.
-X-, on 18 April 2012 - 09:15 PM, said:
Oh yes! I've tried to do what you've said. Put all hotfixes together and try to integrate them all at once. About 30 errors poped-up.
OK???
I'm not doing anything special. Just trying to install all of them.
Look -X-, I'm just following your package.
How da hell should I know that 971513 is replaced by 2564958 IF you didn't wrote that on your "update" page???
There are no traces of 971513 there.
This post has been edited by Killjoy: 18 April 2012 - 10:43 PM
#14
Posted 18 April 2012 - 11:08 PM
971513? Where did you get that? What makes you think that needs to be added? Is that a SP2 or SP1 or SP0 update? My website covers Windows XP SP3 high-priority updates only! It's impossible to list everything that one MIGHT add? I'm not a mind reader. Just add what's on my page and you will be fine. Why do you feel the need to add more? They are not needed!
This post has been edited by -X-: 18 April 2012 - 11:13 PM
#15
Posted 18 April 2012 - 11:56 PM
-X-, on 18 April 2012 - 11:08 PM, said:
971513? Where did you get that? What makes you think that needs to be added? Is that a SP2 or SP1 or SP0 update? My website covers Windows XP SP3 high-priority updates only! It's impossible to list everything that one MIGHT add? I'm not a mind reader. Just add what's on my page and you will be fine. Why do you feel the need to add more? They are not needed!
Well, first time when I was using YOUR updates, 971513 was shown under WINDOWS UPDATES in IE.
Here it is.

IE hotfix, obviously is not integrated as it should be.
Also 923789 for Flash.
WHY???? I don't know and I don't even care.
#16
Posted 19 April 2012 - 12:51 AM

#17
Posted 19 April 2012 - 01:26 AM
Killjoy, on 18 April 2012 - 11:56 PM, said:
I find that hard to believe. Just look at the KB article: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971513
What section was it under? Definitely not high-priority.
#18
Posted 19 April 2012 - 06:19 AM
EDIT: One more thing.
-X-, on 18 April 2012 - 09:15 PM, said:
For a few updates, you should expect to get those "file is not present in ISO to be updated" dialogs. Because these updates do contain files not present in the disc (for some reasons). Here they are:
- KB2564958 (file: uiautomationcore.dll)
- KB2603381 (file: customaddreg.dll)
- KB2661637 (file: iacenc.dll)
- Time zone updates such as KB2633952 (file: tzchange.dll)
EDIT: Still another thing. I checked Killjoy's list of updates he integrated and I see no problem except 971513 and 955759. I have mentioned 971513 already, but for 955759, I think it could be removed as well. Because, the high-priority 955759 update can be replaced by the optional 2492386 and Killjoy have decided to integrate 2492386.
This post has been edited by Explorer09: 19 April 2012 - 07:09 AM
#19
Posted 19 April 2012 - 07:42 AM
#20
Posted 19 April 2012 - 09:26 AM
optionalupdates.PNG (49.98K)
Number of downloads: 10
KB2564958 replaces KB971513, and is offered by Windows Update even when KB971513 is not installed. There's no good reason to slipstream KB971513 when slipstreaming KB2564958.
This post has been edited by 5eraph: 19 April 2012 - 09:37 AM



Help

Back to top









