Jump to content

Welcome to MSFN Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account



Photo

Java 6 Update 32 fails to install...

- - - - -

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
77 replies to this topic

#1
ppgrainbow

ppgrainbow

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 471 posts
  • Joined 04-October 11
  • OS:Vista Ultimate x64
  • Country: Country Flag
Have you tried to intsall Java 6u32 on a Windows 2000 or a Windows XP-based machine? On my Windows 2000-based PC, it's telling me that for some reason, the installation has failed and the Java website hasn't been a help.

This is the error message that I've been getting:

Installation Failed

The wizard was interrupted before Java(TM) 6 Update 32 could be completely installed. To complete installation at another time, please run setup again.

Click "OK" to exit the wizard.

On the Java website, it claims that "The actual root cause of this issue is still under investigation. This error indicates that the Java installation process has failed."

Is there any way to workaround this issue? :(

Update: I checked the installation sizes of jre-6u31-windows-i586-s.exe and jre-6u32-windows-i586.exe and I found that the size of the installer was reduced by 212 KB to 16.2 MB. I installed Java 6 Update 31 and it worked fine without any problems. I already extracted the installation of Java 6u32 on Drive D to investigate.

Edited by ppgrainbow, 28 April 2012 - 12:22 PM.

AVA Direct FX AM3+ specs: Zalman ZM Z9-U3 Black Mid-Tower case / ASUS M5A97 R2.0 / AMD FX-4300 3.8 GHz quad-core processor / Fractal Design Integra R2 500W PSU/ Hyper 212 EVO CPU cooler / Western Digital BLACK SERIES 1 TB (WD1003FZEX) SATA III 7200 RPM / Lite-On iHas124 Black 24x DVD-RW / 8 GB Crucual (2 x 4GB) / StarTech SATA-to-CompactFlash Adapter (35BAYCF2SAT) / Ballistix Sport PC3-12800 DDR3 RAM / EVGA GeForce 8400 GS 520 MHz 1 GB GDDR3 / Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate SP2 x64



How to remove advertisement from MSFN

#2
blackwingcat

blackwingcat

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 792 posts
  • Joined 31-May 08
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
I researched this problem.

BWC Blog(JP)

J6u32 includes GetSystemWow64DirectoryA in regutils.dll

I reported here

Have you tried to intsall Java 6u32 on a Windows 2000 or a Windows XP-based machine? On my Windows 2000-based PC, it's telling me that for some reason, the installation has failed and the Java website hasn't been a help.

This is the error message that I've been getting:

Installation Failed

The wizard was interrupted before Java(TM) 6 Update 32 could be completely installed. To complete installation at another time, please run setup again.

Click "OK" to exit the wizard.

On the Java website, it claims that "The actual root cause of this issue is still under investigation. This error indicates that the Java installation process has failed."

Is there any way to workaround this issue? :(

Update: I checked the installation sizes of jre-6u31-windows-i586-s.exe and jre-6u32-windows-i586.exe and I found that the size of the installer was reduced by 212 KB to 16.2 MB. I installed Java 6 Update 31 and it worked fine without any problems. I already extracted the installation of Java 6u32 on Drive D to investigate.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
BlackWingCat =^^=
http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

#3
ppgrainbow

ppgrainbow

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 471 posts
  • Joined 04-October 11
  • OS:Vista Ultimate x64
  • Country: Country Flag
Thank you so much for telling me! :)

Java 6 (which was complied using Visual Studio .NET 2003) is still supported on Windows 2000, but with update 32, the screwed up by adding GetSystemWow64DirectoryA, a dependency that doesn't exist on Win2k, but on Windows XP SP1 and later.

As you may have also know this, Java 6 will soon be EOL'd in not too many months from now. Originally, the EOL date for Java 6 was on July 2012, but it has now been extended to no later than November 2012. no exact EOL date for Java 6 has been made at this time. Additionally, extended support for the compiler to the Java Runtime Environment, Visual Studio .NET 2003 (VS 7.1) ends on 9 April 2013.

AVA Direct FX AM3+ specs: Zalman ZM Z9-U3 Black Mid-Tower case / ASUS M5A97 R2.0 / AMD FX-4300 3.8 GHz quad-core processor / Fractal Design Integra R2 500W PSU/ Hyper 212 EVO CPU cooler / Western Digital BLACK SERIES 1 TB (WD1003FZEX) SATA III 7200 RPM / Lite-On iHas124 Black 24x DVD-RW / 8 GB Crucual (2 x 4GB) / StarTech SATA-to-CompactFlash Adapter (35BAYCF2SAT) / Ballistix Sport PC3-12800 DDR3 RAM / EVGA GeForce 8400 GS 520 MHz 1 GB GDDR3 / Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate SP2 x64


#4
blackwingcat

blackwingcat

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 792 posts
  • Joined 31-May 08
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
The bug is registerd database.

Bug ID: 7166889 Java6u32 uses GetSystemWow64DirectoryA in regutils.dll
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
BlackWingCat =^^=
http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

#5
ppgrainbow

ppgrainbow

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 471 posts
  • Joined 04-October 11
  • OS:Vista Ultimate x64
  • Country: Country Flag

The bug is registerd database.

Bug ID: 7166889 Java6u32 uses GetSystemWow64DirectoryA in regutils.dll


Thank you for getting the bug registered in the database. Hopefully, in Java 6u33, it will get fixed before Java 6 hits EOL this November.

AVA Direct FX AM3+ specs: Zalman ZM Z9-U3 Black Mid-Tower case / ASUS M5A97 R2.0 / AMD FX-4300 3.8 GHz quad-core processor / Fractal Design Integra R2 500W PSU/ Hyper 212 EVO CPU cooler / Western Digital BLACK SERIES 1 TB (WD1003FZEX) SATA III 7200 RPM / Lite-On iHas124 Black 24x DVD-RW / 8 GB Crucual (2 x 4GB) / StarTech SATA-to-CompactFlash Adapter (35BAYCF2SAT) / Ballistix Sport PC3-12800 DDR3 RAM / EVGA GeForce 8400 GS 520 MHz 1 GB GDDR3 / Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate SP2 x64


#6
Yffffonz

Yffffonz

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 40 posts
  • Joined 11-October 11
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
same issue with Java 6u33. It did not get fixed.

@BlackWingCat et al, is there a workaround for installing the Java 6 updates on Windows 2000?

#7
ppgrainbow

ppgrainbow

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 471 posts
  • Joined 04-October 11
  • OS:Vista Ultimate x64
  • Country: Country Flag

same issue with Java 6u33. It did not get fixed.

@BlackWingCat et al, is there a workaround for installing the Java 6 updates on Windows 2000?


The problem might be that this bug might not even get fixed as Java 6 will hit EOL sometime this November. So far, no one has even voted for that bug. :(

AVA Direct FX AM3+ specs: Zalman ZM Z9-U3 Black Mid-Tower case / ASUS M5A97 R2.0 / AMD FX-4300 3.8 GHz quad-core processor / Fractal Design Integra R2 500W PSU/ Hyper 212 EVO CPU cooler / Western Digital BLACK SERIES 1 TB (WD1003FZEX) SATA III 7200 RPM / Lite-On iHas124 Black 24x DVD-RW / 8 GB Crucual (2 x 4GB) / StarTech SATA-to-CompactFlash Adapter (35BAYCF2SAT) / Ballistix Sport PC3-12800 DDR3 RAM / EVGA GeForce 8400 GS 520 MHz 1 GB GDDR3 / Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate SP2 x64


#8
Yffffonz

Yffffonz

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 40 posts
  • Joined 11-October 11
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag

So far, no one has even voted for that bug.

I guess the voting is something internal and not for users... :o

#9
ppgrainbow

ppgrainbow

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 471 posts
  • Joined 04-October 11
  • OS:Vista Ultimate x64
  • Country: Country Flag

So far, no one has even voted for that bug.

I guess the voting is something internal and not for users... :o


That's what I've been thinking. It's obvious that the dependency issue will never get fixed for sure.

AVA Direct FX AM3+ specs: Zalman ZM Z9-U3 Black Mid-Tower case / ASUS M5A97 R2.0 / AMD FX-4300 3.8 GHz quad-core processor / Fractal Design Integra R2 500W PSU/ Hyper 212 EVO CPU cooler / Western Digital BLACK SERIES 1 TB (WD1003FZEX) SATA III 7200 RPM / Lite-On iHas124 Black 24x DVD-RW / 8 GB Crucual (2 x 4GB) / StarTech SATA-to-CompactFlash Adapter (35BAYCF2SAT) / Ballistix Sport PC3-12800 DDR3 RAM / EVGA GeForce 8400 GS 520 MHz 1 GB GDDR3 / Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate SP2 x64


#10
Yffffonz

Yffffonz

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 40 posts
  • Joined 11-October 11
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag

I researched this problem.

BWC Blog(JP)

J6u32 includes GetSystemWow64DirectoryA in regutils.dll

I reported here


Have you tried to intsall Java 6u32 on a Windows 2000 or a Windows XP-based machine? On my Windows 2000-based PC, it's telling me that for some reason, the installation has failed and the Java website hasn't been a help.

This is the error message that I've been getting:

Installation Failed

The wizard was interrupted before Java(TM) 6 Update 32 could be completely installed. To complete installation at another time, please run setup again.

Click "OK" to exit the wizard.

On the Java website, it claims that "The actual root cause of this issue is still under investigation. This error indicates that the Java installation process has failed."

Is there any way to workaround this issue? :(

Update: I checked the installation sizes of jre-6u31-windows-i586-s.exe and jre-6u32-windows-i586.exe and I found that the size of the installer was reduced by 212 KB to 16.2 MB. I installed Java 6 Update 31 and it worked fine without any problems. I already extracted the installation of Java 6u32 on Drive D to investigate.


@BWC I see on your blog the last statement (translated) is: It's. No problem if extended kernel bug

does that mean that u32 and u33 can be installed on Win2K with the extended kernel? or is there no way to install the last few updates?
I am having a little trouble understanding the translation.

Thanks

#11
blackwingcat

blackwingcat

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 792 posts
  • Joined 31-May 08
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
Hi.

Yes you can install u32 and u33 with extended kernel.
I tried to install u33 with v15 extended kernel.
It works fine.

@BWC I see on your blog the last statement (translated) is: It's. No problem if extended kernel bug

does that mean that u32 and u33 can be installed on Win2K with the extended kernel? or is there no way to install the last few updates?
I am having a little trouble understanding the translation.

Thanks


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
BlackWingCat =^^=
http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

#12
dencorso

dencorso

    Iuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Supervisor
  • 6,016 posts
  • Joined 07-April 07
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

So, I think

拡張カーネルなら問題なし.バグだね

should be translated as "The bug is not a problem if the extended kernel is used."
Right?

#13
blackwingcat

blackwingcat

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 792 posts
  • Joined 31-May 08
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag

So, I think

拡張カーネルなら問題なし.バグだね

should be translated as "The bug is not a problem if the extended kernel is used."
Right?


If I translate it to English.,

There is no problem with extended Kernel. It is just a bug that in Java 6 Update 32/33.


Edited by blackwingcat, 18 June 2012 - 02:35 AM.

+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
BlackWingCat =^^=
http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

#14
Filker

Filker
  • Member
  • 1 posts
  • Joined 28-June 12
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Sorry for the perhaps dumb question, but how do you install java with extended kernel ?
I tried installing JDK on a Windows 2000 system with and without the JRE option, to no avail.


Ok, just found it: :lol:
http://blog.livedoor...es/1299806.html

Edited by Filker, 28 June 2012 - 11:23 AM.


#15
conductor71

conductor71
  • Member
  • 7 posts
  • Joined 18-August 12
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag

Ok, just found it: :lol:
http://blog.livedoor...es/1299806.html

Which version of the Kernel Ex is safe to download as there are lots of links on the above page and it is not altogether clear.

I am running an original 12-year old Intel Pentium III desktop, 866 Mhz processor, 256 MB RAM, all official Windows 2000 security updates installed until support ended in June 2010, plus the new update from this month (KB2722913) after reading about that. I also use Office 2000 and Outlook Express on this PC.

I have newer laptops running Windows XP and Windows 7 but there is one good reason why I still use the old Win 2k machine a lot: because for many months my wifi adaptor can pick up a strong unencrypted wifi signal from a neighbouring property when used on the Win 2k PC, even though the signal is invisible when you scan for it (it connects automatically when I switch on my PC). However, despite many attempts, I cannot detect nor connect to this same free wifi signal using the same adaptor in exactly the same location on either of my laptops. Therefore my old Win 2k PC is saving me a lot of money each month in broadband fees which I would otherwise have to start paying again. For this reason, I would like to keep using it for as long as possible. I can only presume that the reason I can connect to this wifi on my old PC whereas on my other computers I can't must be something to do with the Windows 2000 operating system itself.

I would also like to see any relevant instructions on how to download Kernel Ex, or is it just a case of downloading it and then running it? Which folder do you put it in and do you have to remove any other installed security updates first?

#16
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,525 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
@conductor71

There's no simple answer to your question :angel

Simply speaking, there exist several different ways how you can update your system. If you don't want to mess around too much then I'd recommend choosing one of the following two methods. I'm assuming that you've already installed everything available from M$ (WU):

1) Install Update Rollup 2 + UURollup (ENU). By doing this you will have almost all official updates & hotfixes and almost all unofficial updates installed. The current version of UURollup (ENU) utilises the extended kernel from WildBill although the next one is likely to use the BlackWingCat's version.

2) Install Update Rollup 2 + UURollup (Global) + BlackWingCat's kernel. By doing this you will have almost all official updates & hotfixes installed but you will miss most of the unofficial updates which aren't related to the kernel (you can still install them one by one manually). BlackWingCat's kernel is more advanced than the WildBill's one at the moment.

Please take into account the fact that this is a very simplified guideline which doesn't cover other packages like .NET Framework, etc. but it may be good for you to begin with.

post-47483-1123010975.png


#17
Yffffonz

Yffffonz

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 40 posts
  • Joined 11-October 11
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
@tomasz86..
Will you will post here when the next version of UURollup (ENU) is released (that uses BlackWingCat's kernel)? I think that will be the breakpoint to take the plunge and install Update Rollup2 + UURollup (ENU). is there any issue in installing those two now and then wanting to use the next updated UURollup (ENU) when you release it? i.e. needing to or the ability to uninstall the current version of UURollup (ENU) in order to use a release with BlackWingCat's kernel (assuming it is in the next version as you suggest). or will the updated version conceivably replace the necessary files such that BWC's kernal is used? Does this make sense?
Thanks again for your work on the SP5.2

#18
tomasz86

tomasz86

    www.windows2000.tk

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,525 posts
  • Joined 27-November 10
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
@Yffffonz

1. If nothing unexpected happens then the next version of UURollup with BWC kernel will be probably released on 30th September 2012. A detailed release plan of UURollup is explained in the very beginning of the main USP5.2 topic. Of course, Daily & Weekly versions will be available much earlier.

2. At the moment UURollup (ENU) is incompatible with BWC kernel. If you install the two together then the system will likely not start (but safe mode should work). Only UURollup (Global) can be used with BWC kernel, and of course Update Rollup 2 is also compatible with BWC kernel.

3. I've always been testing installation over the previous version of UURollup so it shouldn't be a problem to just leave the old one and install the new one over it. Uninstallation is actually pretty risky, especially if you've installed other updates/programs in meantime. When the new version using BWC kernel is ready it should be also possible to install it over BWC kernel but I can't guarantee that yet.

Edited by tomasz86, 22 August 2012 - 11:14 PM.

post-47483-1123010975.png


#19
erpdude8

erpdude8

    MSFN Master

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,141 posts
  • Joined 24-November 04


same issue with Java 6u33. It did not get fixed.

@BlackWingCat et al, is there a workaround for installing the Java 6 updates on Windows 2000?


The problem might be that this bug might not even get fixed as Java 6 will hit EOL sometime this November. So far, no one has even voted for that bug. :(


same problem when trying to install Java 6 Update 35, the newest release of Java 6, but I think this one is worse than previous releases.

#20
ppgrainbow

ppgrainbow

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 471 posts
  • Joined 04-October 11
  • OS:Vista Ultimate x64
  • Country: Country Flag

same problem when trying to install Java 6 Update 35, the newest release of Java 6, but I think this one is worse than previous releases.


Why do you think that Java 6 Update 35, the newest release of Java 6 is worse than the previous release?

Oracle has eventually extended the lifespan of Java 6 through sometime in February 2013.

AVA Direct FX AM3+ specs: Zalman ZM Z9-U3 Black Mid-Tower case / ASUS M5A97 R2.0 / AMD FX-4300 3.8 GHz quad-core processor / Fractal Design Integra R2 500W PSU/ Hyper 212 EVO CPU cooler / Western Digital BLACK SERIES 1 TB (WD1003FZEX) SATA III 7200 RPM / Lite-On iHas124 Black 24x DVD-RW / 8 GB Crucual (2 x 4GB) / StarTech SATA-to-CompactFlash Adapter (35BAYCF2SAT) / Ballistix Sport PC3-12800 DDR3 RAM / EVGA GeForce 8400 GS 520 MHz 1 GB GDDR3 / Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate SP2 x64


#21
blackwingcat

blackwingcat

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 792 posts
  • Joined 31-May 08
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
I migrate Java 6 update 35 Installere for WIndows 2000.

Java 6 Update 35 Installer for Windows 2000

The migration for Windows 2000 is too easy for me.

Sun microsystems is too lazyyyyyyyyy to understand that Sun can't do it. :realmad:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
BlackWingCat =^^=
http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

#22
Phenomic

Phenomic

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 279 posts
  • Joined 31-July 09
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

I migrate Java 6 update 35 Installere for WIndows 2000.

Java 6 Update 35 Installer for Windows 2000

The migration for Windows 2000 is too easy for me.

Sun microsystems is too lazyyyyyyyyy to understand that Sun can't do it. :realmad:



Thank you.

The last official version that works is jdk-6u31-windows-i586.exe, free download form Oracle.

#23
Yffffonz

Yffffonz

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 40 posts
  • Joined 11-October 11
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
@ blackwingcat..

Thanks for this brother...

p.s. just a heads up. I had to run this twice on my machine to get it to work. might have been that I had ie and firefox windows open when i first ran it... Just a heads up for others that may try to run it.

Edited by Yffffonz, 01 October 2012 - 09:49 PM.


#24
blackwingcat

blackwingcat

    Friend of MSFN

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 792 posts
  • Joined 31-May 08
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag
Thx. I'll check it.

@ blackwingcat..

Thanks for this brother...

p.s. just a heads up. I had to run this twice on my machine to get it to work. might have been that I had ie and firefox windows open when i first ran it... Just a heads up for others that may try to run it.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
BlackWingCat =^^=
http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

#25
erpdude8

erpdude8

    MSFN Master

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,141 posts
  • Joined 24-November 04

I migrate Java 6 update 35 Installere for WIndows 2000.

Java 6 Update 35 Installer for Windows 2000

The migration for Windows 2000 is too easy for me.

Sun microsystems is too lazyyyyyyyyy to understand that Sun can't do it. :realmad:


thanks for making the j6u35 package, BWC. although I got the original J6u35 package from Sun to install properly after I installed unofficial KB935839 v18b (kernelex) on Win2000.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users