Roffen, on 25 July 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:
Maybe system volumes don’t need to be as large as 30GB?
Well, there should be some "difference" between the XP and the 7 one.
I mean, official requirements for a plain XP are stated as 1.5 Gb.
Same requirements for 32 bit 7 are 16 Gb.
I would rather use the 250 Gb disk to host XP, like:
Drive 0 (250GB)
1. 10GB Basic (XP System, C:)
2. 90GB EXT Data
3. 150GB EXT (Backup of D:)
Drive 1 (320GB)
1. 30GB Basic (Win7 System, C:)
2. 140GB EXT Data
3. 150GB EXT (Backup of D:)
Disk 2 partitions (320GB)
1. 10GB Basic, System
2. (2/4/6/8) GB Primary (Pagefile, S:) <- this depends on the RAM you have available (and by a number of other factors, mostly phylosophical ones)
3. 150GB EXT (Common Data, D:)
(4. EXT ...) <- you could use this for "Programs" that are not "forcibly" installed to C:\Programs
I see as "vital" (for the intended setup) that the partitions on the first two disks dedicated to the backup of the DATA D:\ partition on the third disk have the SAME size of the latter, if you need more size for D:\ you should reduce the size of the "other EXT" volume to allow the threee (original + 2 backups) to be the same size.
Roffen, on 25 July 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:
I am in the habit of disconnecting all drives except the one I am installing a system on.
This is a good habit, and you may need to use it during the installation of the new setup.
Roffen, on 25 July 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:
Should I have them all connected all the time from first installing Win7 on the first, XP on the second, and the other things on the third drive?
No. The general "rule of the thumb" which applies specifically to this case is to ALWAYS install Operating Systems in the order they were published.
Specifically, and this may partly answer your following question, the "new" BOOTMGR+\boot\BCD "booting mechanism" can boot BOTH the "previous" OS (the XP) AND the new one (the 7) whilst the "old" NTLDR+BOOT.INI "booting mechanism" can boot ONLY the XP and NOT the 7.
In the intended setup (though this can be changed using a third party application, such as grub4dos) the BOOTMGR+\boot\BCD will become your "primary" bootmanager and the NTLDR+BOOT.INI will be used either as secondary bootmanager or as "simple" bootloader.
You may want to check this site, where the topic is clearly discussed and includes some nice, "immediate" graphics 8or all that matters you can read "7" instead of "Vista"

throughout the site):
http://www.multibooters.co.uk/
Roffen, on 25 July 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:
I need some info about what it means, and how to make the “possibility of loading the XP NTLDR\BOOT.INI” on the first drive.
Same goes for “possibility of loading the 7 BOOTMGR\boot\BCD” on the second drive.
See above.
Roffen, on 25 July 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:
With respect to drive 3, I am afraid I need some info about how to get “yet another copy of both XP and Win7 boot files” installed on it.
we'll get to it as soon as we have a more detailed "plan"
Roffen, on 25 July 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:
I have the habit of installing programs on the second volume instead of the default of C: whenever that option is available. If you don’t think there is any merit to that, I won’t do it on this installation. Maybe the size of the C volumes ought to be different from what I suggest.
Well, in the proposed setup you could use third disk, see my modified list at the beginning of the post.
Roffen, on 25 July 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:
I don’t know how to set the path for the pagefile but I probably can find out.
Sure it is easy, and anyway it is something that you can do "post-install" and "revert" any time.
Roffen, on 25 July 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:
ETA: "The FIRST time a disk is seen by any given NT system is during install.".
Where can I read more about the intricacies of drive letter assignments?
You can have a look to the dedicated page on the site I posted a link to:
http://www.multibooters.co.uk/mbr.html
If you want to delve a little deeper, read this:
http://www.911cd.net...showtopic=19663
and check this site:
http://thestarman.pc.../mbr/index.html (warning: this is "pretty much advanced", don't worry if you cannot undersand something at first)
jaclaz