The anti-virus you recommend installed for windows 8?
#1
Posted 11 October 2012 - 04:52 AM
But I can not make it to microsoft security essential antivirus, and if you help me
#2
Posted 11 October 2012 - 05:01 AM
#3
Posted 11 October 2012 - 12:04 PM
By definition, window-8' app that using that 'SDK' must be labeled as ADWare, for it behave not much different than exisiting adware.
#4
Posted 12 October 2012 - 04:22 AM
Of the freeware I use in my virtual machines is Comodo Internet Security, it's good but takes time to play with its settings to lower user interaction to a minimum. No blue screens either. One drawback is it doesn't update AV defs as often as for example Eset does.
#5
Posted 12 October 2012 - 11:09 PM
For my work PCs, though, I use Norton 360 or Norton Internet Security. However, I'm sticking with the pre-2012 versions of the software. I made the mistake of "upgrading" Norton 360 on my (Vista) laptop to version 6, and it's been Metrofied into big ugly squares with a kindergarten look.
--JorgeA
This post has been edited by JorgeA: 12 October 2012 - 11:09 PM
#7
Posted 12 October 2012 - 11:45 PM
#9
Posted 30 October 2012 - 12:56 AM
#10
Posted 30 October 2012 - 01:00 AM
#11
Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:52 PM
#12
Posted 04 November 2012 - 03:20 AM
Win8_Defender.png (5.01K)
Number of downloads: 33
scrolling through the Explorer is nearly impossible, because of Defender.
I've removed the crap with this tool:
http://www.msfn.org/...registry-tweak/
#13
Posted 04 November 2012 - 06:27 AM
Quote
sorry, but that's bul*****!
Quote
Quote
This issue would be with any antivirus-software, porbably much more by using other scanners.
Please take a look at av-Comparitives there is al listing of the most antivirus-tools and a performance test...read this and talk on...
Defender has one of the best performance of all testes antivirus-tools, but detection-rate is really bad.
This post has been edited by geneticplasma: 04 November 2012 - 06:32 AM
#14
Posted 04 November 2012 - 07:26 AM
Quote
but detection-rate is really bad.
Isn't that an oxymoron?
can i read that as: "Defender perform well that it allow many virus(ii/es ,whatever float your boat) to slips into your system" ?
This post has been edited by Joseph_sw: 04 November 2012 - 07:29 AM
#15
Posted 04 November 2012 - 11:14 AM
Quote
No it isn't.
Quote
Also no!
For most of all Defender affords enough security.
But if you often click on files like "big_tits.exe" or on Warez-Sites "Crack_all.exe" it could be useful to use another antivirus-tool.
This post has been edited by geneticplasma: 04 November 2012 - 11:15 AM
#16
Posted 04 November 2012 - 08:02 PM
MagicAndre1981, on 04 November 2012 - 03:20 AM, said:
scrolling through the Explorer is nearly impossible, because of Defender.
I've removed the crap with this tool:
http://www.msfn.org/...registry-tweak/
I have a terrible computer, and mine is nothing like yours.
#17
Posted 05 November 2012 - 10:28 AM
geneticplasma, on 04 November 2012 - 06:27 AM, said:
Defender.png (65.15K)
Number of downloads: 28
No impact?
each icon in explorer opens with a 2 sec delay.
No impact?
Good to see that your test shows that my NOD32 is better in performance. Be happy with your your crappy MSE/Defender and is terrible detection rate
This post has been edited by MagicAndre1981: 05 November 2012 - 10:28 AM
#18
Posted 05 November 2012 - 12:10 PM
Quote
Maybe you should upgrade your Pentium II to a Pentium 4 CPU
#19
Posted 06 March 2013 - 01:48 AM
- ← Windows 8 RP theme for Windows 8 RTM
- Windows 8
- ~ Need Shortcut Path Name to a few of the Metro Apps ~ →



Help
Back to top











