Page 1 of 1
general error
#2
Posted 19 October 2012 - 01:49 PM
That's one the worse description of your problem.
My crystal ball tell me you're using a 32 bits apps on windows 95 and it is throwing this error.
Perhaps you'll provide more detail like what is throwing this error and on which operating system you get it.
Also as it is the coding/scripting area, you'll have to provide the current source code of the apps generating this error.
My crystal ball tell me you're using a 32 bits apps on windows 95 and it is throwing this error.
Perhaps you'll provide more detail like what is throwing this error and on which operating system you get it.
Also as it is the coding/scripting area, you'll have to provide the current source code of the apps generating this error.
#3
Posted 19 October 2012 - 02:17 PM
allen2, on 19 October 2012 - 01:49 PM, said:
That's one the worse description of your problem.
My crystal ball tell me you're using a 32 bits apps on windows 95 and it is throwing this error.
Perhaps you'll provide more detail like what is throwing this error and on which operating system you get it.
Also as it is the coding/scripting area, you'll have to provide the current source code of the apps generating this error.
My crystal ball tell me you're using a 32 bits apps on windows 95 and it is throwing this error.
Perhaps you'll provide more detail like what is throwing this error and on which operating system you get it.
Also as it is the coding/scripting area, you'll have to provide the current source code of the apps generating this error.
So I start a setup.exe file that tells me erroe [35] general protection fault in setup.exe at 0097:4 C58 code 0000 ss 0087 ds 0087 eg 0107
9050 9050 ax bx cx dx 0117 1301 sp 136c is 137th bp 0117 to 0156
I use it even under dos 6.22, but the problem does not change
This post has been edited by basilico: 19 October 2012 - 02:17 PM
#4
Posted 19 October 2012 - 04:13 PM
#5
Posted 19 October 2012 - 10:27 PM
#6
Posted 20 October 2012 - 04:06 PM
dencorso, on 19 October 2012 - 10:27 PM, said:
Heck!
General failure reads the drive, NOT the disk!
Spoiler
@basilico
Standard litany, please
http://homepage.ntlw...ard-litany.html
jaclaz
#7
Posted 21 October 2012 - 03:55 AM
jaclaz, on 20 October 2012 - 04:06 PM, said:
Heck!
General failure reads the drive, NOT the disk!
General failure reads the drive, NOT the disk!
Spoiler
Fixed!
Attached File(s)
-
GenFailure.GIF (8.54K)
Number of downloads: 2
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1



Help
Back to top










