Page 1 of 1
replacing dllhost ?
#1
Posted 05 December 2012 - 06:23 AM
how devastating for OS would be if dllhost.exe would be replaced with dud ?
(just like XP could to get rid of verclsid)
(just like XP could to get rid of verclsid)
#2
Posted 05 December 2012 - 06:41 AM
vinifera, on 05 December 2012 - 06:23 AM, said:
how devastating for OS would be if dllhost.exe would be replaced with dud ?
(just like XP could to get rid of verclsid)
(just like XP could to get rid of verclsid)
Why don't you just try doing it and observe the results?
Ray Bradbury said:
Life is "trying things to see if they work".
jaclaz
#3
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:40 AM
Incorrectly cleaning a virus that "replaces" processes like this (or explorer or whatever) will definately cause problems. I'd say give it a shot in a VM!
#4
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:42 AM
this will break a lot of functions (thumbnail, copy/move)
#5
Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:50 AM
Actually, it might just be easier to use ProcExp to pause the dllhost.exe process and see how Windows behaves.
#6
Posted 05 December 2012 - 02:26 PM
#7
Posted 05 December 2012 - 09:22 PM
#9
Posted 06 December 2012 - 08:54 AM
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1



Help
Back to top










