does WD external hdd work in W2K ? 1TB WD usb disk
#1
Posted 10 March 2013 - 08:40 AM
I need more room in my hdd so I have decided to buy an external hdd. As I can read, no one specifies about wk2 but only xp, 7 and those new ones. I'm specially interested in this one:
http://western-digit...se-9496708.html
Any idea?? Thanks!!
#2
Posted 10 March 2013 - 09:24 AM
As long as it's recognized, my impression is that Win2000 and up supports up to 2.2tb. Maybe Win2K isn't mentioned because it's an unsupported OS? Notice that MAC OS doesn't show older either (and unsure IF older would support it).
Someone will correct me if I'm wrong on this.
This post has been edited by submix8c: 10 March 2013 - 11:40 AM
#3
Posted 10 March 2013 - 10:01 AM
#4
Posted 10 March 2013 - 11:42 AM
This post has been edited by tomasz86: 10 March 2013 - 11:43 AM
#5
Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:48 PM
tomasz86, on 10 March 2013 - 11:42 AM, said:
These are "news" for me, care to expand on this?
Or are you talking of the common Y-cable to allow more than 500 mA to power the disk drive?
I am not aware of a change in specs before 3.0
jaclaz
#6
Posted 10 March 2013 - 02:19 PM
#7
Posted 10 March 2013 - 02:32 PM
tomasz86, on 10 March 2013 - 02:19 PM, said:
Never seen one of those, you mean something like this one:
http://www.amazon.co...d/dp/B0052OJ97O
They seem to be needed for *any* of USB 1.1, 2.0 or 3.0. (in the sense that you still have a female "A" connector on the motherboard, and if it USB 3.0 you don't need the "Y cable", but if it is indifferently a USB 1.1 or 2.0 you may need it) of course if the disk has a USB 3.0 "micro-B" connector.
Or am I missing something?
jaclaz
This post has been edited by jaclaz: 10 March 2013 - 02:36 PM
#8
Posted 10 March 2013 - 03:06 PM
#9
#10
Posted 11 March 2013 - 04:26 AM
tomasz86, on 11 March 2013 - 12:38 AM, said:
Yes
Let's try to expand on the matter, I am just trying to understand if there is a misunderstanding.
A USB 1.1 connector on a motherboard is (normally) an A-type connector female and can provide by specs up to 5*100=500 mA.
A USB 2.0 connector on a motherboard is (normally) an A-type connector female and can provide by specs up to 5*100=500 mA..
A USB 3.0 connector on a motherboard is (normally) an A-type connector female and can provide by specs up to 6*150=900 mA.
The A-type connector is the same (actually "compatible) for USB 1.1, 2.0 and 3.0.
A USB 3.0 connector on a 2.5" hard disk external enclosure may be a (USB 3.0) B-micro type.
To connect the enclosure to a motherboard you need a USB 3.0 cable.
Normally, i.e. if you have a USB 3.0 motherboard, you need a USB 3.0 cable with a A-type male connector on one end and a B-micro-type on the other.
Normally, i.e. if you have a USB 1.1 or 2.0 motherboard, you can use that same cable, as the hard disk won't need more than 500 mA.
In some cases where the motherboard provides less current than specs or the enclosure/disk requires more than 500 mA (which are THE SAME for USB 1.1 or 2.0) you need an Y cable, capable of getting some more current from another USB port.
So you need a USB 3.0 cable with a doubled power connector A-type besides the standard data/power A-type connector on one end and a B-micro-type on the other.
I am saying that there is not AFAIK any particular difference between USB 1.1 and 2.0 (apart data transfer speed that you might get) when connecting a USB 3.0 device, you seemed to say that there is one.
jaclaz
#11
Posted 11 March 2013 - 05:32 AM
#12
Posted 11 March 2013 - 06:05 AM
jaclaz, on 11 March 2013 - 04:26 AM, said:
Well, I said that because I myself had problems with my USB 3.0 external HDD (2.5") which is detected properly on my desktop when it's connected to a USB 2.0 port but is not detected at all when connected to a USB 1.1 port on an older laptop.
It just acted as if it wanted to start but couldn't (the LED was blinking). Same thing happens if I try to connect it to my desktop using a USB 2.0 extension cable. It must be connected directly to the USB 2.0 port in order to start properly. In case of that laptop it couldn't start even though it was connected directly to the USB 1.1 port.
This post has been edited by tomasz86: 11 March 2013 - 06:08 AM
#13
Posted 11 March 2013 - 12:19 PM
tomasz86, on 11 March 2013 - 06:05 AM, said:
It just acted as if it wanted to start but couldn't (the LED was blinking). Same thing happens if I try to connect it to my desktop using a USB 2.0 extension cable. It must be connected directly to the USB 2.0 port in order to start properly. In case of that laptop it couldn't start even though it was connected directly to the USB 1.1 port.
I see
BUT the issue with an USB 2.0 extension cable is "queer".
I mean. an extension cable is "passive" and if you give to it 500 mA at one end, you can surely can get AT LEAST 499.999 mA at the other end
http://www.girr.org/.../usb_stuff.html
It seems like *everything* or nearly everything is "out of specs", one way or the other.
Maybe they are two different causes (the one being the laptop not providing enough "juice", and the other one about the HD somehow *sensing* the extension cable as "not suitable" for data transfer, i.e. not related to current or causing a too high voltage drop).
jaclaz
#15
Posted 12 March 2013 - 03:42 AM
Dagorlad, on 11 March 2013 - 08:52 PM, said:
Yes
jaclaz
#16
Posted 12 March 2013 - 08:40 AM
Dagorlad, on 11 March 2013 - 08:52 PM, said:
Some users may not click your link, expecting some sort of documentation but you have linked to a zip. In the future you are required to specify exactly what is in this type of download (which has 2 PDF files in the zip) ... see rule 1c.
#17
Posted 29 March 2013 - 04:26 AM
jaclaz, on 11 March 2013 - 12:19 PM, said:
I've just bought a USB 3.0 extension cable and replaced the old USB 2.0 extension cable with it. The HDD works correctly when connected through the new one so there's definitely something about it
This post has been edited by tomasz86: 29 March 2013 - 04:26 AM
- ← Any hope of getting Windows 2000 running on my PC?
- Windows NT4 / 2000 / 2003
- Editing filetype - impossible to pass just the filename? →



Help
Back to top










