Jump to content

Welcome to MSFN Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account


Photo

Why use Win 9x on new PCs in 2013?

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1
darrelljon

darrelljon

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 59 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Why use Win 9x on new PCs in 2013?


How to remove advertisement from MSFN

#2
dencorso

dencorso

    Adiuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Super Moderator
  • 5,782 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Why use Win 9x on new PCs in 2013?

Why not?

#3
G8YMW

G8YMW

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 110 posts
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag
I could say "Why use Win8 on a new computer?"
One reason could be that you have in effect, two operating systems in one. So if Windows falls over, you can revert to dos and sort things out.
Some like making a new machine bend to their will.
Then there is "Why not, after all its only a hobby?"

Then I could (seriously) say "Why bother with a thatched roof on your house when tiles are better?"

Edited by G8YMW, 18 April 2013 - 07:38 AM.


#4
togermano

togermano

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 105 posts
Is that even possible?

#5
submix8c

submix8c

    Inconceivable!

  • Patrons
  • 4,193 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Why create another opinion thread on the subject when so many already exist? :unsure:

Someday the tyrants will be unthroned... Jason "Jay" Chasteen; RIP, bro!

Posted Image


#6
dencorso

dencorso

    Adiuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Super Moderator
  • 5,782 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Because darrelljon loves doing it from time to time... previous one is this thread, and I bet he won't find out any new facts, nowadays. :boring:

#7
LoneCrusader

LoneCrusader

    Resistere pro causa resistentiam.

  • MSFN Sponsor
  • 803 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Why use Win 9x on new PCs in 2013?

Hmmm.. so many reasons, but it can just about be summed up with these:

-Because we feel like it.
-Because for our purposes, newer versions of Windows have nothing whatsoever to offer us that we cannot do with 9x.
-Because we utterly reject the idea that a computer (or piece of software) needs to be updated every ten minutes or so.
-Because it annoys arrogant people who think we're crazy. :w00t: :lol:
-Because people like this ^ say it can't be done.

And to quote a post I saw once on a different forum: :angel

...it's morally righteous.


Edited by LoneCrusader, 18 April 2013 - 03:55 PM.


#8
rloew

rloew

    MSFN Expert

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,084 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag
A few more:

Faster.
Smaller.
Portable.
Easier to hack and extend.
Fewer restrictions on what you can do.
Compatable with a wider range of hardware.
When people say it can't be done, I do it.
Ye who enter my domain. Beware! Lest you become educated in the mysteries of the universe and suffer forever from the desire to know more.

#9
LostInSpace2012

LostInSpace2012

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 520 posts
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Because.... the newer computers I used were barely any faster. Sure, the CPU speed a lot faster, but actually doing things on them doesn't seem any quicker.

If you account for the bloat, and general poor user-interface of newer Windows versions, I can get things done easier and faster on Windows ME.

#10
togermano

togermano

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 105 posts
Can I get win98 working on my intel ivybridge i5?

#11
submix8c

submix8c

    Inconceivable!

  • Patrons
  • 4,193 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Can I get win98 working on my intel ivybridge i5?

Please stop cluttering this Topic with Off-Topic questions. Try it, then open your OWN thread for assistance...

Someday the tyrants will be unthroned... Jason "Jay" Chasteen; RIP, bro!

Posted Image


#12
jaclaz

jaclaz

    The Finder

  • Developer
  • 14,042 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Please stop cluttering this Topic with Off-Topic questions. Try it, then open your OWN thread for assistance...

Well, here you are assuming :ph34r: that togermano will fail in his attempt :w00t: .

Posted Image

jaclaz

#13
submix8c

submix8c

    Inconceivable!

  • Patrons
  • 4,193 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
Well, I DID say "Try it...". I guess I ASSUMED they would instead of asking "Will It Work?"...

Short answer - :unsure: - Try It!

edit - forgot to say... Good Morning, Mr. Grammar Policeman! :D (Bwahahah!)

Edited by submix8c, 19 April 2013 - 07:59 AM.

Someday the tyrants will be unthroned... Jason "Jay" Chasteen; RIP, bro!

Posted Image


#14
jaclaz

jaclaz

    The Finder

  • Developer
  • 14,042 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

edit - forgot to say... Good Morning, Mr. Grammar Policeman! :D (Bwahahah!)


Good moorning :),

Short answer - :unsure: - Try It!


Mr. de La Palice .... :angel

jaclaz

#15
Commodore

Commodore

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 27 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag


Why use Win 9x on new PCs in 2013?

Why not?

:thumbup

#16
darrelljon

darrelljon

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 59 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
I agree. I do like creating these threads from time to time.

#17
SomeGuy

SomeGuy

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 18 posts
  • OS:95
  • Country: Country Flag

Why use Win 9x on new PCs in 2013?


Never underestimate the power of legacy software or hardware.

You would be unpleasantly surprised at the amount of stuff, especially in the corporate world, that MUST be run under some older version of Windows, or even DOS, and can not be virtualized. More often than not, there is no newer version of the software or hardware to upgrade to, as the company that made it is long out of business, or it was an in-house project. If there is a newer version, it costs several hojillion dollars - so either shoehorn Windows 9x on a newer computer or head off to eBay.

#18
dencorso

dencorso

    Adiuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Super Moderator
  • 5,782 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

If there is a newer version, it costs several hojillion dollars - so either shoehorn Windows 9x on a newer computer or head off to eBay.

Instead of spending several hojillion dollars on some new software, spend about US$ 50 on a couple of RLoew's patches, and Windows 9x will fit confortably in pretty new hardware, no shoehorning needed at all.

#19
Zollex

Zollex

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 56 posts
I can play Sonic R! :lol:

#20
Fredledingue

Fredledingue

    MSFN Expert

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,267 posts
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Compatable with a wider range of hardware.
When people say it can't be done, I do it.

Ok, so please tell me how I can use just about all the new hardware I bought recently (scanner, printer etc), when drivers fail to install?

We are stuck with old versions of internet browsers, of flash, of javascript ewngine, ... and it makes 5 years we can't update any of our favorite software.

So, why using W9X in 2013? BECAUSE WE ARE FANATICS!!!:D

And more seriousely, in my case, I find W98SE much safer.

HTASoft.com

superchargedwindows9xig1.png
Still Using W98SE+++ ...Daily.

#21
LostInSpace2012

LostInSpace2012

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 520 posts
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Just some things to ponder.....

The .zip archive format has been around since the late eighties, or early nineties. When Philip Katz enhanced the .arc format for compressing files. He was then sued by System Enhancement Associates and so he changed the name from PKARC to PKZIP. Thus, the zip format was born. It's been the defacto archive format, universally supported every since... and that was oh, about, 1993. Sure, there's been rival formats, like LZH, ARJ, RAR, and now 7zip. But since zip is so widely used, and the format has a good speed to compression ratio, none of those other formats have been able to replace ZIP.

Now, you could use zip in a DOS command prompt, you could use it on Windows 3.1, Win9x, and everything since. Sure, the zip format has changed a little (with newer Deflate methods) but it's still pretty much the same. I can use Info Zip's executables on any platform. I can still unzip a file made from Windows 7 or 8 and open it using DOS.

Another thing is the picture formats have hardly changed. Jpeg format has been around like twenty-five years. They tried to "improve" it by creating the Jpeg2000 format. But it resulted in much larger files and not much noticeable improvement in quality. Might as well just use TIF or PNG formats. The majority of images on the net are using the same format that was around in the days of DOS and windows 3.1

MP3 format has hardly changed a bit. I can still listen to MP3's using any older Win9x program.

Well, movie files are a pain in the butt with all the different "codecs"... this is definitely one area where older systems are at a disadvantage, but with the right software you can convert newer files into playable videos for DOS, Windows 3.1, Win9x.

Also, proprietary formats like Microsoft Word documents and PDF files, both of which I don't like and try not to use, are part of the whole "planned obsolescence" scheme of forcing users to "upgrade" to the latest and greatest every few years. Just to make Microsoft and Adobe richer than they already are. I don't see what is great about any of the upgrades.

When I was sending resumes to potential employers I sent my resume in RTF format. Does anyone know if MS Office will open Abiword documents???? I'd really like to know. Because I can do more formatting and stuff with Abiword than I can using a basic RTF or Wordpad document. But anyway, the point is, I could still send people my resume using Windows ME and they could still open it.

In reality I could log onto Microsoft Word 6.0 using Windows 3.1 and type a paper or resume that looks just as good, and with all the options and features that most people use, as the latest "Office 2012." The former program was simple, elegant and efficient, and it runs lightly. The latter is just bells and whistles, bloatware, with useless hieroglyphic symbols to make it look newer. They both do the same exact thing. And I prefer the look of Word 6.0 to all the newer office programs.

I can play audio CD's and burn them and rip them on my Windows ME machine. I can burn data CD's and iso files using Windows ME. The audio CD hasn't changed since the 1980's. It's the same piece of technology for the last 30 years. Why do I need a brand new computer from 2012 to read/play something that is technology from the 80's?

Lastly, I'm not a computer whiz or anything, but I know how to and I'm comfortable with formatting my computer in DOS, and reinstalling Windows 9x. I also have Windows 2000 and I mess around with that OS as well. But because of "product activation" I've never bothered with XP and newer systems to reinstall the OS. But I guess that's beside the point. Basically, I grew up in the DOS and Windows 3.1 era, and I'm still actually living in it, LOL, seeing as how I'm using Windows ME.... and I'll continue using Windows ME. Because I think it is the zenith of Microsoft Windows. The most intuitive, easy, yet powerful user interface. I didn't like the newer version of Windows that I've tried..... (Windows 2000 was good, Windows XP was okay and I like it, Vista was bad, 8 is totally terrible, haevn't tried 7 because the stores around here don't sell it anymore. They only sell Windows 8. Blech..)

I think it just boils down to the following... I'm set in my ways, I thought the newer versions of Windows were needlessly complicated, and I didn't like them. So I'm sticking with Widnows ME :-)

Oh and, the internet is still decent if you turn off javascript. I'm using K-Meleon 1.5 and I can still check my Gmail and read the news. So that's good enough.

Edited by LostInSpace2012, 01 May 2013 - 03:00 AM.


#22
M()zart

M()zart

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 275 posts
Well, if talking about formats, there are some newer formats. More and more often I use music in flac, alac, m4a, ac3 formats. There is now a new picture format - webp, that have chances to become common. Though picture and music formats are not a big problem for older systems

#23
Dude111

Dude111

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPip
  • 297 posts
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Why use Win 9x on new PCs in 2013?


Well in my opinion WIN98/98se is the BEST WIN OS they ever released! (It started to go downhill with the Win2000 SP4 update (Started being locked down,privacy removed,etc))

#24
LostInSpace2012

LostInSpace2012

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 520 posts
  • OS:ME
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

I don't think Windows 9x would even work on new PC's.

I just spent the last month being forced to use Windows 2000 because my WinMe computer went kaput.

Never Again!

Windows ME is my OS of choice. I got a "new" old computer, and now I'm back in business.

I'd rather use Windows 3.1 (my second favorite OS) than be force to use 2000 or XP or anything else.

Edited by LostInSpace2012, 30 August 2013 - 12:10 AM.


#25
Andrew T.

Andrew T.

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 94 posts
  • OS:95
  • Country: Country Flag

I think the OP brought up a legitimate question; though probably not in the way he intended.  What's the benefit of running Windows 9x on a new computer, when it's easier to run it on an older one instead?  It isn't as though a Pentium III isn't fast enough.


Andrew T.
"Now crush your computer into small chunks, add flour, and bake one hour."




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



How to remove advertisement from MSFN