Monroe Posted July 27, 2013 Author Share Posted July 27, 2013 Interesting ... "FAA certifies first two drones for commercial use", more interesting are the comments below the article ... this one says anything under 50 lbs is considered a model, those two drones are just over 50 lbs (?) ... wonder if they could be under 50 lbs but were made to be over 50 lbs. The article says "both weigh less than 55 pounds" but maybe over the 50 lbs limit?Yep its sad the government is light-years behind us,FAA Modernization And Reform Act 2012 [H.R.658.ENR] SEC.336it clearly states anything under 50 lbs is a model and not bound by the FAA rules. Lawyers can fight over that all day reality is till you hurt someone, bother someone or make money off it nobody is going to care.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 I guess that situation (on Law side) is much more complex than that.The document is however public:http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CRPT-112hrpt381/pdf/CRPT-112hrpt381.pdfI guess that the first point that makes the certification needed for those is that a "model" can ONLY be flown for hobby:(1) the aircraft is flown strictly for hobby or recreational use;(2) the aircraft is operated in accordance with a community-based set of safety guidelines and within the programming of a nationwide community-based organization;(3) the aircraft is limited to not more than 55 pounds unless otherwise certified through a design, construction, inspection, flight test, and operational safety program administeredby a community-based organization;(4) the aircraft is operated in a manner that does not interfere with and gives way to any manned aircraft; and(5) when flown within 5 miles of an airport, the operator of the aircraft provides the airport operator and the airport air traffic control tower (when an air traffic facility is located atthe airport) with prior notice of the operation (model aircraft operators flying from a permanent location within 5 miles of an airport should establish a mutually-agreed upon operating procedure with the airport operator and the airport air traffic control tower (when an air traffic facility is located at the airport)). and, later:© MODEL AIRCRAFT DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘model aircraft’’ means an unmanned aircraft that is—(1) capable of sustained flight in the atmosphere;(2) flown within visual line of sight of the person operatingthe aircraft; and(3) flown for hobby or recreational purposes. jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monroe Posted August 1, 2013 Author Share Posted August 1, 2013 Well, I may have finally found a reason to like drones ...African officials seek U.S. drones to fight elephant poachershttp://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jul/31/elephants-rhinos-lions-and-drones-tanzania-conside/Tanzania’s storied wildlife reserves could soon get a watchful, winged inhabitant: U.S. drones.On his visit to the East African nation last month, President Obama discussed the possibility of using unarmed, unmanned aircraft to help overstretched park rangers combat the growing problem of elephant poaching in Tanzania’s vast wildlife reserves and national parks, Tanzanian Ambassador to the United States Liberata Mulamula told editors and reporters at The Washington Times this week.Wildlife groups estimate that 10,000 to 25,000 elephants are killed in Tanzania each year for their ivory tusks and the number of elephants in southern Tanzania has fallen by more than half. Much of the ivory is shipped illegally to Asian markets.“The extent of poaching is very, very, very high,” John Salehe, director of the African Wildlife Foundation’s Maasai Steppe, said in a phone interview from Tanzania.There has been sharp increase in elephant poaching over the past year, he said.... more at the linkpretty good if it can save some endangered wildlife ... too bad they wouldn't be armed with missles to blow the bums up, away from the animals of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monroe Posted August 1, 2013 Author Share Posted August 1, 2013 Is this really a helicopter or possibly a drone ??? The picture of it flying sure looks more like a drone.Dutch artist turns dead ostrich into a helicopterhttp://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/dutch-artist-turns-dead-ostrich-helicopter-article-1.1414534Bart Jansen, who had previously converted his dead cat into a similar remote-controlled device,' thought it would be funny to 'make fly a bird that can't' in his latest project.August 1, 2013The Dutch artist who turned a dead cat into a remote-controlled helicopter is back, and this time he's using an ostrich.Bart Jansen made headlines in 2012 when he converted the corpse of his deceased puss Orville, who was killed by a car, into a chopper.Now the barmy inventor has gone one step further by combining a dead ostrich with mechanical parts to create an "Ostrichcopter".... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 Well, one of the points thats that I thought we discussed on this thread enough is that the borders between a RC helicopter (quadricopter) and a "drone" and "unmanned aircraft" and "A.I. driven" are pretty much confused.This thingy:http://www.bladehelis.com/350qx/is sold as "RC controlled quadricopter", but has a "get home" function :See, besides the official video: this UNofficial one : jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monroe Posted August 1, 2013 Author Share Posted August 1, 2013 Well I was just having some fun ... I guess if the "developer" or owner of the dead ostrich wants to call it a helicopter ... then that's what it is. I just thought in today's world ... calling it a flying "ostrich drone" would be more fitting or with the times ! ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monroe Posted August 14, 2013 Author Share Posted August 14, 2013 The Drone Industry doesn't like the word "drone" ...Drone industry gives journalists not-so-subtle hint — don’t use the word ‘drones’August 14, 2013http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/14/drone-industry-journalists-dont-use-word-drones/“Drone” is a dirty word at this week’s drone industry convention in Washington.The sector long has opposed use of the term, which, some argue, carries inherently negative connotations and doesn’t accurately describe the awesome technology seen in today’s unmanned vehicles.Efforts to stop journalists from using the word “drone” have failed miserably over the years, but the industry hasn’t given up trying.Inside the media room at the Washington convention center, the WiFi password is the not-so-subtle phrase “DontSayDrones.”The word is defined in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary as “an unmanned aircraft or ship guided by remote control.”At this point, removing the term from the American lexicon — or from future news stories — will be virtually impossible.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrofLuigi Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 I'm more interested in who changed the word Tiny from this topic's title and why. GL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monroe Posted August 15, 2013 Author Share Posted August 15, 2013 (edited) So you also wondered why the word "Tiny" was changed ... since I started this topic, I was curious myself why the word was changed ... it wasn't me ... but it is interesting that you noticed. I can only take a stab at it, since I have only a few years of college ... it had to be someone with a PhD or two PhD's and is well versed in "large" words.Diminutive is not a word that I use much in my daily survival on Earth, but it's always good to be more "educated" ... "Tiny" was from the article and was just fine with me in my day to day existence before the "big one" (asteroid) hits!Am glad that someone also noticed and wondered why ... may have been a "secret" government hacking group that decided they didn't like the word "Tiny" ... heck, they could be changing other words and sentences without too much notice. I just think it's funny the way you posted your "observation" ! Edited August 15, 2013 by duffy98 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Is it a bird?Is it a plane?Is it a drone?Two out of three :http://martinjetpack.com/What is the Martin Jetpack?The Martin Jetpack is the world’s first practical jetpack. It consists of a purpose-built gasoline engine driving twin ducted fans which produce sufficient thrust to lift the aircraft and a pilot in vertical takeoff and landing, and enable sustained flight.The Martin Jetpack is creating a new segment in the aviation and recreational vehicle markets. Initially designed with the leisure market in mind, commercial demand for the Martin Jetpack has seen the development programme focus on readying the product for use in a number of sectors including emergency response, defence and recreation, with numerous applications in each sector.There is also an unmanned version planned which will lift more than most vertical take-off and landing unmanned aerial vehicles.The Martin Jetpack can take off from a small space, so is easy to deploy anywhere. It is easy to learn to fly, has an automated hover function, and is expected to be able to be flown in reasonable weather conditions.Safety is very important to the Martin Aircraft Company. The dedicated engine is being designed to an aviation industry standard. In addition, the Martin Jetpack is designed to protect the pilot, including a ballistic parachute and a crumple undercarriage.jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monroe Posted August 15, 2013 Author Share Posted August 15, 2013 Well I can see it will be out of my price range and it's a little large to suit me ... I prefer the one that James Bond had in Thunderball !James Bond used the Jetpack in 1965's Thunderball, to escape from gunmen after killing a SPECTRE agent.http://www.007james.com/gadgets/jet_pack.phpThe JetpackIn the 1965 movie Thunderball, James Bond (Sean Connery) uses Q's Jetpack to escape from two gunmen after killing Jacques Bouvar, SPECTRE Agent No. 6. It was also used in the Thunderball movie posters, being the "Look Up" part of the "Look Up! Look Down! Look Out!" tagline. The Jetpack returned in the 2002 movie Die Another Day, in the Q scene that showcased many other classic gadgets. The Jetpack is a very popular Bond gadget and is a favorite among many fans due to its originality and uniqueness.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Yep , but there a couple not-so-trifling differences, the "original" jetpack (which BTW was a - failed - project of the US military) are:time of flight limited to max around 30 seconds use of a highly corrosive and dangerous "fuel", hydrogen peroxide About prices, the Martin thingy is estimated at between US$ 70,000 and 100,000, whilst it's possible competitor, the JetPi Falcon is estimated at ariound US$ 200,000.BTW a hydrogen peroxide fueled model from the same JetPi company was sold in 2007 for US$150,000http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_packhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_pack#Jetpack_Internationaljaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monroe Posted October 7, 2013 Author Share Posted October 7, 2013 Aerospace Company Develops Drone That Can Fly Continuously For 5 YearsOctober 7, 2013http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2013/10/07/aerospace-company-develops-drone-that-can-fly-continuously-for-5-years/MORIARTY, N.M. (CBS Las Vegas) — An aerospace company has presented its design “atmospheric satellites” that fly at 65,000 feet and provide drone-like services such as live-mapping and monitoring narcotics trafficking.Titan Aerospace recently offered the Solara series of such drones: which can fly continuously for nearly five years, charging its own battery high above commercial aircraft through the use of solar power. The larger Solara will be 60 meters wide and have the ability to carry about 250 pounds.Cruising speed for the Solara is about 65 mph, and the unmanned craft will have an operating range of over 2.8 million miles.... more information at the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dencorso Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Just a heads up: there's a piece on drones in the Nov 2013 Issue of Scientific American. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monroe Posted October 29, 2013 Author Share Posted October 29, 2013 (edited) Thanks for the drone article link ... that's an interesting story about how easy it is to hack a drone (at that time anyway ... that story is from 2010) ... the U.S. Navy helicopter seems to have failed on everything ... this part of the article: "To make matters worse, the drone failed to execute software instructions that would have forced it to return to its base. "Can't find out what happened to the "stray" drone ... did they destroy it or finally get it to return to the base? You have to subscribe to read the rest of the article ... or did I miss another link?Drone news has sort of dried up compared to the earlier part of the year. Edited October 29, 2013 by duffy98 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now