MSFN Forum: Which would be better..... - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Which would be better..... 2k or XP? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   strekship 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 129
  • Joined: 13-March 04

Posted 19 March 2004 - 02:45 PM

I have a Toshiba Satilite 460CDT. It has a 2gb hdd, 83mb of ram, and a Pentium 166MMX. I would like to know which os woyld be better for it. It came with ME, but i was having problems with it. Which would be better for my system, Win 2k or XP?


#2 User is offline   demlak 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 77
  • Joined: 16-August 03

Posted 19 March 2004 - 02:47 PM

2k..
xp won´t install on this old machine

#3 User is offline   Aaron 

  • The MSFN Banana
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 5,767
  • Joined: 17-August 01

Posted 19 March 2004 - 02:54 PM

I ran Windows 2k on my old 166 box with 256mb of RAM before and its slow as a snail. Don't bother.

#4 User is offline   WildKat 

  • Life No'9
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: 20-April 03

Posted 19 March 2004 - 03:16 PM

itl have to be windows98se

#5 User is offline   Skyfrog 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 314
  • Joined: 10-September 03

Posted 19 March 2004 - 04:27 PM

I'd probably go with Windows NT 4.0 myself.

#6 User is offline   strekship 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 129
  • Joined: 13-March 04

Posted 19 March 2004 - 07:49 PM

Ok, thx for the input.

#7 User is offline   likuidkewl 

  • [Centos~]$
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 960
  • Joined: 16-September 03

Posted 19 March 2004 - 08:20 PM

Windows 95 or DOS

#8 User is offline   XtremeMaC 

  • MSFN SuperB
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Joined: 13-October 03

Posted 19 March 2004 - 10:15 PM

3.1 or 3.11 :rolleyes:
okay i'd go with 98 se..

how the hell can u get 83mb ram? did u cut the chip or something :)
64+19=83 ==> 19= %59 of 32mb ram :D

#9 User is offline   Skyfrog 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 314
  • Joined: 10-September 03

Posted 20 March 2004 - 09:40 AM

Quote

how the hell can u get 83mb ram?


My guess would be 16 and 64

#10 User is offline   MerlinTheWizard 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 79
  • Joined: 07-February 04

Posted 20 March 2004 - 09:41 AM

Skyfrog, on Mar 19 2004, 04:27 PM, said:

I'd probably go with Windows NT 4.0 myself.

I second that.

#11 User is offline   likuidkewl 

  • [Centos~]$
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 960
  • Joined: 16-September 03

Posted 20 March 2004 - 12:50 PM

Just remember anything before 98 doesn't support USB, so you have to use serial or paralell for everything. Just FYI.

#12 User is offline   strekship 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 129
  • Joined: 13-March 04

Posted 20 March 2004 - 01:18 PM

Well, it don't matter anyways cuz it borke last night for some reson. I tuned it on, the powerlight came on, but it did not start up.

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy