ZortMcGort11

lost in space's sigs

31 posts in this topic

but you misspelled "boobs" and typed "noobs", instead.

Actually I consider them boons (the boobs, not the noobs).

jaclaz

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but you misspelled "boobs" and typed "noobs", instead.

Actually I consider them boons (the boobs, not the noobs).

jaclaz

Me too, jaclaz....me like 'em even more than bon bons,

but i'm *still* a bon-bon-Hong-Kong-ding-dong-King-Kong-ping-pong-golden-gong-long-gone-lone-loon-good-goon-oboe-ogling-egg-nogg-drinkin'-thinkin'-stinkin'-blinkin'-plinkin'-blinkin'(2)-twinklin'-twiddlin'-piddlin'-fiddlin'-freaky-geeky-squeaky boondoggling aficionado of all them particular things -- individually, and collectively.

Since you be talkin' bout boons,

i sure hope you don't start rambling bout African and Arabian Old World monkeys belonging to the genus Papio, part of the subfamily Cercopithecinae baboons:

z_baboon.jpg

crazy.gifcrazy.gifcrazy.gifcrazy.gif

Edited by larryb123456
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Important announcement

Please ignore this comment that I made in my last post:

but i'm *still* a bon-bon-Hong-Kong-ding-dong-King-Kong-ping-pong-golden-gong-long-gone-lone-loon-good-goon-oboe-ogling-egg-nogg-drinkin'-thinkin'-stinkin'-blinkin'-plinkin'-blinkin'(2)-twinklin'-twiddlin'-piddlin'-fiddlin'-freaky-geeky-squeaky boondoggling aficionado of all them particular things -- individually, and collectively.

for 2 reasons:

#1 -- that be *too ignorant* -- even by my own standards

#2 -- and most importantly, it diminishes the intellectual purity of SpaceCowboy111213141516's post about his sigs

In fact, please disregard EVERYTHING in my last post, except for the *only thing* that made some sense:

crazy.gif crazy.gif crazy.gif crazy.gif

Thanks for your attention regarding this important matter,

Larry

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@LostInSpace2014:

I like your new signature, shown at

http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/171300-lost-in-spaces-sigs/?p=1071984

which depicts former US president Dick Milhous Nixon, on the right, bursting into flames on the day he had to resign his presidency, because he was caught robbing a Wells FargoTM truck.

i5vg5h.jpg

But what I truly love is your new avatar -- (also shown in the above link) -- which is clearly a picture of Samuel L. Jackson playing the character of Jules Winnfield in the 1994 American movie, "Pulp Fiction", directed by Quentin Tarantino, and starring Marilyn Monroe, Andy Warhol, and Pee Wee Herman.

just acutely observing and accurately commenting,

Larry

Edited by larryb123456
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did a little more work on your signature and it be posted here, in my thread:

http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/152748-custom-avatars-and-signatures/?p=1077394

 

I think that'll be my last version.

(I think, therefore I am

a figment of your imagination.)

 

But you might (?) want me to add an image of Monica Lewinsky kissing Bill Clinton.

Just let me know if you want to add that.

I really hope you don't choose to add that,

cause that be a lot of work to do,

even for a genius retard, such as myself.

 

Larry

Edited by larryb123456
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But you might (?) want me to add an image of Monica Lewinsky kissing Bill Clinton.

I guess there might be an issue with WHERE EXACTLY Monica will be kissing Bill in the image. :unsure:

jaclaz

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW, jaclaz,

 

You are *ALWAYS* right on target with your responses !!!

 

Yes, Monica kissed Clinton, many, many times EXACTLY in/on the/his image,

and that's why the Republicans tried to get him impeached.

Edited by larryb123456
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, IMHO it's a good thing that they were, "many, many", as those "kisses" had the highest cost ever seen, in total around US$ 70 million :w00t::ph34r: (and the actual taxpayers paid the bill for Bill ;)).

 

Wait, the good US taxpayers also got a lousy report :whistle::

http://www.salon.com/2002/03/13/ray_3/

The Baltimore Sun was one of the few major newspapers to use Ray’s report as an occasion to call the OIC investigation what it was: a $70 million boondoggle and political witch hunt. As a Sun editorial noted, the money spent on the Starr-Ray investigation would have hired 1,400 teachers for a year, sent 120,000 tons of food to Afghanistan, or provided early intervention for 24,000 young disabled children. Or as American taxpayers might put it, the OIC spent $70 million, and all we got was this lousy report.

 

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CDOC-105hdoc311/content-detail.html

 

jaclaz

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your investigative quote, jaclaz.

That *really*, *really* puts the money waste in its *proper* perspective.

Big time!

 

Well, I called Bill and showed him your quote, and asked him what he thought of the $70 million waste, and he said:

"Duh, well, duh, duh, well, well,

maybe so, but I had $90 million worth of fun

foolin' around with Monica."

 

I mean, Monica *does have* very pretty, pouty lips for the kissin', IMO.

Edited by larryb123456
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.