DirtDevil Posted March 28, 2004 Share Posted March 28, 2004 I was playing a little bit with my optional components... But there is something I can figure out.At the end of each line you have a number.e.g.: msmq=msmqocm.dll,MsmqOcm,msmqocm.inf,,6e.g.: aspnet=aspnetoc.dll,AspnetOcmProc,aspnetoc.inf,,7What exactly are those numbers for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdeboeck Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 my guess is they are a decimal representation of three bitflags (1, 2 and 4) but I have no idea what they would represent. What I find even stranger is why the two entries that do not have an INF file associated, have one field less in the comma seperated line; and why they don't have to be hidden ...NtComponents=ntoc.dll,NtOcSetupProc,,4WBEM=ocgen.dll,OcEntry,wbemoc.inf,hide,7Display=desk.cpl,DisplayOcSetupProc,,7Fax=fxsocm.dll,FaxOcmSetupProc,fxsocm.inf,,7does anyone know how this works or what ntcomponents and display actually do... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alanoll Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 my guess would be that they're system components that microsoft definetely doesn't want removed or whatever.Display looks like the Display Control Panel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxXPsoft Posted April 3, 2004 Share Posted April 3, 2004 Removed - incorrect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdeboeck Posted April 4, 2004 Share Posted April 4, 2004 not quite what we were on about, maxxpsoft. Those are the categories for the kiddie control panel. In sysoc.inf, almost everything has a 7 flag, so it can't be accessibility all the way can it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosh Posted April 4, 2004 Share Posted April 4, 2004 yes, that info maxxpsoft quoted is for registry keys for the control panel cpl's, it's not related to sysoc.inf. -gosh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxXPsoft Posted April 4, 2004 Share Posted April 4, 2004 Yes I was wrong, thought that was it. But I would imagine those are some kind of sorting in the same manner. Didn't look close enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now