Jump to content

Welcome to MSFN Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account



Photo

POSReady 2009 updates ported to Windows XP SP3 ENU

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
417 replies to this topic

#401
egrabrych

egrabrych

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 104 posts
  • Joined 27-May 10
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator


To all:  egrabrych's list seems complete for .NET 2.0, 3.0, 3.5 and 4.0 (please confirm)

 

Was not complete, lacked KB2894842-v2 (for .NET Framework 4.0). Has been corrected.

 

 

but what would be the similar complete list of post-XP updates for .NET 1.0 

 

There .NET Framework 1.0, but the .NET Framework 1.1

 

 

 

Which updates for .NET Framework 1.1 SP1 are still relevant until today?

KB2931352

KB2972207

KB2978114

KB3037572

 

KB2978114 is probably a newer version of the patch KB2931352 (includes newer versions of the same files).

 

Bersaglio list contains all the updates for the .NET Framework 1.1 in order from oldest to most recent.

Of course, all the time, I mean updates released after April 8, 2014 year!


Edited by egrabrych, 22 April 2015 - 11:21 AM.



How to remove advertisement from MSFN

#402
glnz

glnz

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 56 posts
  • Joined 25-January 11
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

To all:  A few remarks from a noob:

 

After we install these .NET updates manually, they seem to be listed in Belarc Advisor, but NEITHER in Update History for Windows Update or Microsoft Update, NOR in Add/Remove Programs.  Tip o' the hat to Belarc.

 

On one of my XP machines (Dell GX280), after first installing SP1 for .NET 1.1 (KB979906 from MS), I was able to install .NET 1.1 update KB2978114 but not KB2972207 (both from BlackWingCat).  Get short error messages without detail.  Any suggestions? 
     (I was able to install both in XP Mode in a different machine - Dell Optiplex 7010 running Win 7 SP1 64-bit in XP Mode.)

 

Thanks.


glnz      old Dell Optiplex 755DT XP Pro SP3 and new Optiplex 7010MT dual-booting Win7 Pro 64-bit and Win 8.1 Pro 64-bit (maybe soon Win 10?)


#403
dencorso

dencorso

    Iuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Supervisor
  • 5,804 posts
  • Joined 07-April 07
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

On one of my XP machines (Dell GX280), after first installing SP1 for .NET 1.1 (KB979906 from MS), I was able to install .NET 1.1 update KB2978114 but not KB2972207 (both from BlackWingCat).  Get short error messages without detail.  Any suggestions? Thanks.

 

Sure. Redeploy the backup from before adding those updates and try again, but, this time, change the order in which you apply the updates.



#404
vinifera

vinifera

    <°)))><

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,053 posts
  • Joined 27-August 09
  • OS:Windows 7 x86
  • Country: Country Flag

why even use 1.x

nobody is compiling apps for it, in fact 1.x series were huge failure


If you want true Windows user experience
try Longhorn builds: 3718, 4029, 4066

#405
glnz

glnz

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 56 posts
  • Joined 25-January 11
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Dencorso - Had tried the other order before.  There's just a snag somewhere.

 

Vinifera - Fine with me to delete 1.1 from my system.  How is that done?  (Like the fish by the way.)


glnz      old Dell Optiplex 755DT XP Pro SP3 and new Optiplex 7010MT dual-booting Win7 Pro 64-bit and Win 8.1 Pro 64-bit (maybe soon Win 10?)


#406
dencorso

dencorso

    Iuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Supervisor
  • 5,804 posts
  • Joined 07-April 07
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Use Aaron Stebner's Removal tool for NET Framework, and select 1.1 (or 1.0, if present) ...



#407
glnz

glnz

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 56 posts
  • Joined 25-January 11
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Dear experts in this thread - there might be a problem.

 

I have just discovered that, in my XP Pro SP3, I have Event Viewer error messages starting Jan 15 of this year and repeating frequently (probably with each reboot) that MAYBE are related to three POS updates I did that day -- KB3021674,  KB3020393  and  KB3019215.

 

The Event Viewer "Application" errors are:

 

Event Type:    Error
Event Source:    Userenv
Event Category:    None
Event ID:    1502
Date:        1/15/2015
Time:        12:28:10 PM
User:        NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE
Computer:    DELLOPTIPLEX755
Description:
Windows cannot load the locally stored profile. Possible causes of this error include insufficient security rights or a corrupt local profile. If this problem persists, contact your network administrator.

 DETAIL - Access is denied.

______

 

Event Type:    Error
Event Source:    Userenv
Event Category:    None
Event ID:    1515
Date:        1/15/2015
Time:        12:28:10 PM
User:        NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE
Computer:    DELLOPTIPLEX755
Description:
Windows has backed up this user's profile. Windows will automatically try to use the backed up profile the next time this user logs on.

______

 

Event Type:    Error
Event Source:    Userenv
Event Category:    None
Event ID:    1511
Date:        1/15/2015
Time:        12:28:10 PM
User:        NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE
Computer:    DELLOPTIPLEX755
Description:
Windows cannot find the local profile and is logging you on with a temporary profile. Changes you make to this profile will be lost when you log off.

______

 

Event Type:    Error
Event Source:    Userenv
Event Category:    None
Event ID:    1502
Date:        1/15/2015
Time:        12:28:11 PM
User:        NT AUTHORITY\LOCAL SERVICE
Computer:    DELLOPTIPLEX755
Description:
Windows cannot load the locally stored profile. Possible causes of this error include insufficient security rights or a corrupt local profile. If this problem persists, contact your network administrator.

 DETAIL - Access is denied.

______

 

Event Type:    Error
Event Source:    Userenv
Event Category:    None
Event ID:    1515
Date:        1/15/2015
Time:        12:28:11 PM
User:        NT AUTHORITY\LOCAL SERVICE
Computer:    DELLOPTIPLEX755
Description:
Windows has backed up this user's profile. Windows will automatically try to use the backed up profile the next time this user logs on.

______

 

Event Type:    Error
Event Source:    Userenv
Event Category:    None
Event ID:    1511
Date:        1/15/2015
Time:        12:28:11 PM
User:        NT AUTHORITY\LOCAL SERVICE
Computer:    DELLOPTIPLEX755
Description:
Windows cannot find the local profile and is logging you on with a temporary profile. Changes you make to this profile will be lost when you log off.

 

 

I see that these error messages involve either  NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE  or  NT AUTHORITY\LOCAL SERVICE, not my User name (my logon name).

 

If I open an explore window and and go to C:\Documents and Settings, I can see that the NTUSER.DAT file in each of LocalService and NetworkService has a last modified date of 1/15/2015.  (The NTUSER.DAT in my own user folder is modified today.)

 

[NOW, MAYBE THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL DETAIL IS NOT RELEVANT, BUT JUST IN CASE:  If I go to System Properties - Advanced - User Profiles - Settings button, my own User Profile (my User Name) is updated today (because I just rebooted), but there are five "Account Unknown"s of approx. 20MB each with "Last Modified" dates of either 12/5/2014 or 3/17/2015.

If I open an Explore window and go to C:\Documents and Settings, I see a bunch of Users I recognize from the past and also :

TEMP

TEMP.NT AUTHORITY

and

TEMP.NT AUTHORITY.000

but their file modification dates are not stopped at 1/15/2015.]

 

So, experts, what do you think?  Is my XP machine in trouble?

 

Thanks.


Edited by glnz, 01 May 2015 - 12:42 PM.

glnz      old Dell Optiplex 755DT XP Pro SP3 and new Optiplex 7010MT dual-booting Win7 Pro 64-bit and Win 8.1 Pro 64-bit (maybe soon Win 10?)


#408
dencorso

dencorso

    Iuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Supervisor
  • 5,804 posts
  • Joined 07-April 07
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

KB3021674 is is userenv.dll version 5.1.2600.6689, as a matter of fact.

It did not cause that error in any of my 4 XP machines, but something wrong may have happened when you installed it.

I don't think your machine is in any deep trouble, however: on the contrary, I think that's a minor glitch that may be ignored for now, but probably can be fixed, with some patience.



#409
glnz

glnz

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 56 posts
  • Joined 25-January 11
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Dencorso - good to read that it's probably only a minor glitch, but this XP machine is still quite important to me, so I'm concerned.

 

The version of userenv.dll I have in both

      C:\Windows\system32

      and

      C:\Windows\system32\dllcache

is 5.1.2600.6689, last modified 12/6/2014 at 3:28am.  (Was installed by KB3021674 ? )

 

I have earlier versions of userenv.dll in:

      C:\WINDOWS\ServicePackFiles\i386 - 5.1.2600.5512 last modified April 13, 2008

      and

      C:\i386 - 5.1.2600.2180 last modified August 04, 2004

 

So, what should I do without risking a melt-down?  (I don't know what userenv.dll does.)

 

Thanks.


Edited by glnz, 01 May 2015 - 03:45 PM.

glnz      old Dell Optiplex 755DT XP Pro SP3 and new Optiplex 7010MT dual-booting Win7 Pro 64-bit and Win 8.1 Pro 64-bit (maybe soon Win 10?)


#410
glnz

glnz

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 56 posts
  • Joined 25-January 11
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Dencorso -

 

EDIT - copies of my KB3021674.log, KB3020393-v2.log and KB3019215.log are attached.  See anything interesting?

 

Attached File  Copy of KB3021674 1-15-2005.txt   11.92KB   6 downloadsAttached File  Copy of KB3020393-v2.txt   11.29KB   4 downloadsAttached File  Copy of KB3019215.txt   5.7KB   4 downloads


Edited by glnz, 01 May 2015 - 04:31 PM.

glnz      old Dell Optiplex 755DT XP Pro SP3 and new Optiplex 7010MT dual-booting Win7 Pro 64-bit and Win 8.1 Pro 64-bit (maybe soon Win 10?)


#411
dencorso

dencorso

    Iuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Supervisor
  • 5,804 posts
  • Joined 07-April 07
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Dencorso - good to read that it's probably only a minor glitch, but this XP machine is still quite important to me, so I'm concerned.
 
The version of userenv.dll I have in both
      C:\Windows\system32
      and
      C:\Windows\system32\dllcache
is 5.1.2600.6689, last modified 12/6/2014 at 3:28am.  (Was installed by KB3021674 ? )

Yes it was. And it's OK.
 

So, what should I do without risking a melt-down?

For the moment nothing. Proceed as if nothing were wrong. And arm yourself with lots of patience.
There's no reason for any anxiety, so do not panic. Let's let others chime in, in their own time.
Meanwhile, do tell me: Do you have any full backups that are known good?

#412
glnz

glnz

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 56 posts
  • Joined 25-January 11
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Dencorso - no full backups since November, before installing my first POS update.  Too long ago, I'm afraid.  Lots of important emails on OE 6 since then.  So much for my smarts.

 

Promise not to panic (and cause this thread to get wrinkled), but do you think these errors can do anything?  I suppose not, since they've been occurring since Jan 15, but still.


glnz      old Dell Optiplex 755DT XP Pro SP3 and new Optiplex 7010MT dual-booting Win7 Pro 64-bit and Win 8.1 Pro 64-bit (maybe soon Win 10?)


#413
JodyT

JodyT

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 275 posts
  • Joined 05-April 11
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

So if I may ask (summary-wise without having to read through the whole thread) the following:

 

  • Can I now assume that entering the registry patch and just ruinning and installing all POSReady updates without any intervention or workarounds is not possible without some added effort?
  • Am I correct that at some point, there will be at least some DLL issues to contend with?  I'm not going to be installing any .NET framwork or updates, and I'm already aware of the update that negatively impacts font rendering.

Thanks :)


Edited by JodyT, 01 May 2015 - 06:43 PM.


#414
glnz

glnz

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 56 posts
  • Joined 25-January 11
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Dencorso and others - just FYI - my older, test XP machine (Dell GX 280) has the same error messages as my important XP machine, starting Jan 13.  On that date, on that older machine, I installed the same three and KB2920792, KB2920790, KB3013126, KB3013410, KB3012176, KB3008923, and KB890830.

 

However, the overlap is only the three I listed above, and, on other OSes, KB3021674 gets some bad reviews having to do with user accounts, etc.

 

I'm trying to think why my two XP machines might be vulnerable to these errors when yours aren't.  Both of mine have Avast Home Free with "Enable Hardware Virtualization" on, although only my more important machine has the CPU capacity for HAV.  I instaled CryptoPrevent only AFTER these errors started, and these errors repeated on a reboot of my better machine today with CryptoPrevent set to "None".  Firefox with lots of security?  SpywareBlaster?  Spybot S&D?  Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit Free?  Seems unlikely that these have anything to do with it. 

 

Well, could it be Avast's new features?  Who else out there has Avast Home Free on his XP machine and does NOT have these Event Viewer errors?


Edited by glnz, 01 May 2015 - 07:37 PM.

glnz      old Dell Optiplex 755DT XP Pro SP3 and new Optiplex 7010MT dual-booting Win7 Pro 64-bit and Win 8.1 Pro 64-bit (maybe soon Win 10?)


#415
dencorso

dencorso

    Iuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Supervisor
  • 5,804 posts
  • Joined 07-April 07
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Hi, Jody!
Well, up to now, for me and for most users nothing wrong has happened.
Yes, there was that update that impacted fonts, but it was correted next month (KB3034344 has a new win32k.sys inside, v. 5.1.2600.6755, which is OK).
I never had automatic updates on, however, so I always initiated the monthly updates by hand, but that's nothing more than precaution.
Now, glnz is having this issue, but it's the first such case I know of.
 

Am I correct that at some point, there will be at least some DLL issues to contend with?

 
There may well be, at some point, but up to now there is none. But we'll deal with that when it happens, as was the case with the win32k.sys that impacted rendering. Observe that just hiding it and waiting for the next month was enough to solve that but, even before that had happened, harkaz had released an unofficial fix.
  • JodyT likes this

#416
dencorso

dencorso

    Iuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Supervisor
  • 5,804 posts
  • Joined 07-April 07
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Promise not to panic (and cause this thread to get wrinkled), but do you think these errors can do anything?  I suppose not, since they've been occurring since Jan 15, but still.


No. Whatever had to happen would already have happened long ago. So do create a full backup right away. Afterwards we may think of ways of recreating the missing profile. But we won't be messing with any non-backed-up system, in no way, OK?

#417
JodyT

JodyT

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 275 posts
  • Joined 05-April 11
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Hi, Jody!
Well, up to now, for me and for most users nothing wrong has happened.
Yes, there was that update that impacted fonts, but it was correted next month (KB3034344 has a new win32k.sys inside, v. 5.1.2600.6755, which is OK).
I never had automatic updates on, however, so I always initiated the monthly updates by hand, but that's nothing more than precaution.
Now, glnz is having this issue, but it's the first such case I know of.
 

Am I correct that at some point, there will be at least some DLL issues to contend with?

 
There may well be, at some point, but up to now there is none. But we'll deal with that when it happens, as was the case with the win32k.sys that impacted rendering. Observe that just hiding it and waiting for the next month was enough to solve that but, even before that had happened, harkaz had released an unofficial fix.

 

That sounds good to me.  So I'll proceed with updating my mom's machine and see what happens.  Thanks for the report in a nutshell.  I needed that. :)



#418
dencorso

dencorso

    Iuvat plus qui nihil obstat

  • Supervisor
  • 5,804 posts
  • Joined 07-April 07
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

That sounds good to me.  So I'll proceed with updating my mom's machine and see what happens.  Thanks for the report in a nutshell.  I needed that. :)


My pleasure! But do keep us posted: this thread is serving as a meeting point where we exchange info on what's happening, all the time. Whenever an issue occurs, it's posted here, and so are solutions and workarounds. :yes:




3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users