Jump to content
Strawberry Orange Banana Lime Leaf Slate Sky Blueberry Grape Watermelon Chocolate Marble
Strawberry Orange Banana Lime Leaf Slate Sky Blueberry Grape Watermelon Chocolate Marble

MSFN is made available via donations, subscriptions and advertising revenue. The use of ad-blocking software hurts the site. Please disable ad-blocking software or set an exception for MSFN. Alternatively, register and become a site sponsor/subscriber and ads will be disabled automatically. 



jaclaz

MkPriLog batch to access a same disk under two different interfaces

Recommended Posts

jaclaz    943

Once upon a time in a not-so-far away forum, here:

http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/173265-formatting-an-external-drive-using-different-interfaces/

someone found himself in a "queer" situation with an external hard disk case that provided two connections, a USB one and a e-SATA one.

This specific enclosure worked fine with the disk it originally came with as that was a "real" 512 bytes/sector disk and both interfaces exposed a 512 bytes/sector device.

But, once the disk was changed to a "new" one that is one of the so called "Advanced Format" kind, something strange happened.

The e-SATA interface exposed a 512 bytes/sector device 

The USB interface exposed a 4096 bytes/sector device.

The net result was that the disk was unreadable when connected through the "other" interface.

 

Provided "solutions" involved one or more of the following:

  • buy a new disk
  • buy a new enclosure/interface
  • give up and buy a new external disk
  • buy new PC's and have everything USB3
  • ....

Being, besides old and grumpy, also cheap, I proposed instead a "workaround" that after quite a bit of experimenting (thanks to the OP Dave-H) seems like being "good enough" to be useful to other (I hope few) people being affected by the same issue, and that (possibly) may become useful when/if similar issues will present themselves.

 

Basically the disk is divided into two partitions, the first one being a small FAT12 volume that will always be accessible (both when connected through the 512 bytes/sector interface and when connected through the 4096 bytes/sector one) on which a small batch (and a few needed command line executable used by the batch) resides.

The second partition is a (large or main) NTFS one that can be accessed from the one or the other interface but that needs to be "switched" every time the connection is changed to the "other" interface.

 

All is needed when you connect the disk is to run the switcher.cmd from the first (FAT) small partition and it will "switch" the second (NTFS) main partition to the appropriate byte/sectors settings.

 

Though the scope of the thingy is quite "narrow", probably the underlying "principles" may be useful in other situations, we will see. 

 

The attached is version 0.99 which more or less means that all the various batches which were at various releases like 0.06 , 0.07 or 0.09 mod3, since they seemed to work, were suddenly - after very little and mostly esthetical changes - promoted to 0.99 which should give the impression of "not really final, yet almost there". 

 

Have fun. :)

 

jaclaz

Version0.99.zip

Edited by jaclaz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave-H    88

Thanks jaclaz!

I'll check it out and let you know if I find any issues.

It's been really fascinating doing this with you, and thanks for all your perseverance and patience with me at times!

Cheers, Dave.

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pasito    0

@Dave-H

Having the same issue you did/do, been working on it with Wonko the Sane and wanted to know exact make/model of your external case to compare with mine. If you have a moment, pls reply in our thread at reboot.pro. Many thanks!

edit: @Dave-H nevermind, sorry bout that, i got it from yr other thread [173265]:

On 1/5/2015 at 7:50 AM, Dave-H said:

The old drive was a Hitachi HDS721010KLA330, which was originally in my Sky+ satellite PVR.

The enclosure I'm using is a NL-HD29 made by Newlink.

Edited by pasito

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dave-H    88

Hi @pasito.
Sorry for the delay in replying, I've been away, but I see you found the information anyway!
:)
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×