xper

Windows 10 - Deeper Impressions

3,327 posts in this topic

I think there needs to be some re-wording, of the "privacy" industry as a whole. Microsoft is not protecting your privacy because it is viewing and saving everything. What they are talking about is to protect against OTHER people or firms from seeing your history. In a real world situation, it would be relatable to an agreement with a security company... say you have your home set up with cameras in every room (including the bathroom and under your covers), the security monitoring company would say it would not share your data with other people. But truly, there is no privacy in that situation.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tripredacus said:

I think there needs to be some re-wording, of the "privacy" industry as a whole. Microsoft is not protecting your privacy because it is viewing and saving everything. What they are talking about is to protect against OTHER people or firms from seeing your history. In a real world situation, it would be relatable to an agreement with a security company... say you have your home set up with cameras in every room (including the bathroom and under your covers), the security monitoring company would say it would not share your data with other people. But truly, there is no privacy in that situation.

Coincidentally, right now there are two rather serious scandals over here in Italy, one which is making the headlines about a couple of people snooping on members of the parliament/VIPs emails and other electronic contacts, and one with a much lower impact, but actually IMHO much more serious, about the Justice department "discovering" that (lawful) interceptions that were technically implemented (recorded and stored) by (authorized) private contractors were accessible remotely  - besides by the Court/Prosecution Offices - by the contractors themselves :w00t: (and that some of these contractors may have actually peeked in them ).

Of course we have an Italian saying for that, "segreto di Pulcinella":

http://www.wordreference.com/iten/segreto di Pulcinella
 

anyone with more than 2 neurons AND a very-very basic IT background would have suspected that, just like your security monitoring company example.

jaclaz


 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Windows 10 insider 15007 has a new Setting parameter, "Holographic."  Is this a new age of technology or have I just missed "Holographic" technology?  This one seems to be VR related.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, not VR, but AR (Augmented reality). Microsoft is most probably preparing to provide Hololens to the public.

https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-hololens/en-us

As for me, it makes much more sense that VR. Instead of something that seems to be useful only for entertainment, AR in this meaning can provide a value for different sort of professionals. That's just my 2 cents.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't need my reality augmented! NR (normal reality) is bad enough!!

And, since I still refuse to downgrade to Windows 10, I'll probably never have it.

c

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are there any truly Holgraphic interfaces around yet? A 3 dimensional image with input, output and communication capabilities?  Intelligence, artificial or otherwise, would be nice, too.  In another life it was there or was that just Star Ship Enterprise?

High expectations?  Maybe not when comparing an iPhone 7 Plus to the GE 400 mainframe computer of 1969 or the IBM 7090 mainframe of the same vintage.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No real interface that I am aware of. At least, not in the physical sense like we see in movies. Hololens can do things like that, but the visual is only inside the headset, although that video can be output... since that is how they demonstrated it live. It is still not something that exists in the real world space, that anyone can see.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't there a bell curve for what is "safe" regarding security of Windows OS? Such as now, Windows 95 must be safer than Windows 7 because no one writes viruses for it.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, there are still ones hiding on old FDDs and CDs, or on some obscure download sites. I'm curious how pre-NT windows will behave, while attacked by some of the most popular ransomwares (Locky, Cryptolocker, CTB-locker, Cerber, Petya or sth like that).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.