Fav resolution on a 17" monitor
#21
Posted 24 November 2004 - 06:21 PM
1600x1200 @85hz 21"
sometime's i will run @ 1856x1392@72hz
#22
Posted 25 November 2004 - 02:32 AM
#23
Posted 22 January 2005 - 10:40 PM
#24
Posted 25 February 2005 - 08:48 AM
You're still in the dark ages then...
#25
Posted 09 May 2005 - 11:12 AM
When you adjust, drag the meter, your sttings in windows the picture of the aspect of your monitor is represented for you.
You need to know what the manufacturer suggests as the "Native Resolution."
For Example. a 4:3 aspect monitor best resolution will be differ from a 5:4 aspect monitor.
The specs on your monitor should tell you the aspect ratio.
You can use the pythagorean therom to figure out the aspect ratio.
A^2+B^2=C^2 for a 4:3 sapect = 4in for 3in ht. The reason most tv's are 4:3 is the 3-4-5 number relatationship. 3^2+4^2=5^2 or 9+16=25.
It is hard to tell the difference between 4:3 ratio and 5:4 ratio by just looking. These are standard screens.
4:3 Aspect 9+16=25
15" A+B=15
17" A+B=17
19" A+B=19
5:4 Aspect 16+25=41
15" A+B=15
17" A+B=17 W= 13.375^2 + 10.75^2= 17.16 I used crude measurements. I use a 1280 X 1024 is the Native Resoultion 13.375/10.75=1.244 close to 1.23
the 16:9 is HDTV standard, not necessarily widescreen standard.
more math
http://www.andrewdun...ect/Aspect.html
Just email me with your measurements, if you want clearer asnswer.
There are other considerations as well. Video memory and card resolution capabilities.
#26
Posted 09 May 2005 - 01:23 PM
I can't really notice the difference between 72Hz and anything higher. Go lower though, and things start to hurt after about 20 mins...
#28
Posted 26 May 2005 - 02:35 PM
I'm at 60Hz because if I go any higher my monitor gets this wierd black shadowy thing on the left side, anybody have an idea of what that is?
#29
Posted 26 May 2005 - 03:23 PM
#30
Posted 29 May 2005 - 04:02 PM
1024x768x32 @ 114 (or 116, can't remember)
And yes, I DO notice the difference between 85 and 114 (114 is just the max I can get with the monitor
On this pc, a 17" LCD
1280x1024x32 @ 75
#32
Posted 07 June 2005 - 07:21 PM
Give me a 19" LCD or a 21" CRT
If only I could afford a dual-display
#33
Posted 07 February 2007 - 01:28 AM
The CRT is a Philips Brilliance 17A, which is 4:3. I typically use these resolutions:
1280x960 32-bit 75Hz -- desktop
1600x1200 32-bit 60Hz -- games
I have also played with these widescreen resolutions (shrinking the screen vertically so it's letterboxed):
1920x1080 32-bit 60Hz -- 1080P
1920x1200 32-bit 60Hz -- maximum resolution
The LCD is also a Philips (not sure the model) with a 5:4 aspect ratio and a 1280x1024 native resolution, so I run 1280x1024 32-bit 75Hz on that.
I agree, it's a terrible idea to run a 5:3 resolution on a 4:3 screen, and I really wish they'd never invented the 1280x1024 resolution in the first place. I wish I had a 1600x1200 LCD, but that'd cost too much.
This post has been edited by Raptor007: 07 February 2007 - 01:32 AM
#35
Posted 12 February 2007 - 12:29 AM
but i dont mind 1280 X 1024
i usually choose this when i run out of space on the desktop
800 X 600 is horrible and 640 X 480 is really really horrible
my monitor doesnt support over 1280 X 1024
#36
Posted 12 February 2007 - 12:55 AM
But I've got a 19" Philips CRT running 1280 x 1024 @ 85Hz.
#38
Posted 31 July 2008 - 12:08 AM
#39
Posted 08 August 2008 - 09:45 AM
#40
Posted 17 September 2008 - 10:43 PM
- ← Where Do You Get On MSFN At The Most? What Do You Use MSFN Mostly For?
- The Poll Center
- Playstation III or Xbox 360? →



Help

Back to top









