Jump to content

Welcome to MSFN Forum
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account



Photo

Any Regular NT4 or W2K Users Here, Still?

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1
nostaglic98

nostaglic98

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 64 posts
  • Joined 24-March 12
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Following the thread I read over in the XP Forums here on MSFN, I wanted to pose this question over here:

 

Do we still have any members regularly posting who use (or know of) systems that run either NT4 or 2000?

 

I still use Windows 2000 regularly on at least one of my machines - mostly for document creation, internet browsing and using a simple WYSIWYG editor for my Website. It serves this purpose very nicely. 

 

As for NT4, I've played around with it in VM's...

 

However, thanks to Netcraft (and third-parties who reported on their April 2014 Webserver Report), it would seem a number of Web-Servers running NT4 and IIS4 happen to exist, as well.

Who these sites are shall remain undisclosed - simply because you can find this information yourself with a search on any major search engine. 




How to remove advertisement from MSFN

#2
jaclaz

jaclaz

    The Finder

  • Developer
  • 16,639 posts
  • Joined 23-July 04
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Following the thread I read over in the XP Forums here on MSFN, I wanted to pose this question over here:

 

Do we still have any members regularly posting who use (or know of) systems that run either NT4 or 2000?

Yes :yes:

http://homepage.ntlw...no-answers.html

 

More seriously, yes, there are quite a few members running daily NT 4.00 or 2K (besides the ones that spend a lot of time into making unofficial updates/fixes and what not supporting those OS's :thumbup ) .

 

jaclaz


  • sdfox7 likes this

#3
sdfox7

sdfox7

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 120 posts
  • Joined 08-July 14
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Yes, I use NT 4.0 and 2000 regularly on two separate laptops. However, XP is my day-to-day operating system.


Desktop: Intel Server SAI2, XP Pro Dual Pentium III-S Tualatin 1.4GHz/2GB RAM

Laptop: IBM ThinkPad T40, XP Pro Pentium M 1.3GHz/2GB RAM
 
 

 


#4
nostaglic98

nostaglic98

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 64 posts
  • Joined 24-March 12
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

 

Following the thread I read over in the XP Forums here on MSFN, I wanted to pose this question over here:

 

Do we still have any members regularly posting who use (or know of) systems that run either NT4 or 2000?

Yes :yes:

http://homepage.ntlw...no-answers.html

 

More seriously, yes, there are quite a few members running daily NT 4.00 or 2K (besides the ones that spend a lot of time into making unofficial updates/fixes and what not supporting those OS's :thumbup ) .

 

jaclaz

 

 

I am surprised by the "logical yes answer presented" as it seems this is one of the quieter sections of this part of MSFN :)



#5
bpalone

bpalone

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 186 posts
  • Joined 04-March 09
  • OS:Windows 2000 Professional
  • Country: Country Flag

Donator

Run 2K almost daily in a VM, main machine dual boots 2K and a version of the Penguin. 
 
I would say this section is quieter for a couple of reasons. 1.) 2K was and still is a good OS.  2.) The good folks at MS didn't pitch this OS to the masses. If they had, XP probably would of been a flop. :-)  But, then again, the timing of the release of 2K there were some hardware issues that could have backlashed on them with the masses.
  • sdfox7 likes this

#6
Phenomic

Phenomic

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 286 posts
  • Joined 31-July 09
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

I use w2k & XP guest VMs under my Linux host OS. They're loaded permanently for running windows apps. Search is broken in XP, w2k more reliable, especially networking.



#7
sdfox7

sdfox7

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 120 posts
  • Joined 08-July 14
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

Run 2K almost daily in a VM, main machine dual boots 2K and a version of the Penguin. 
 
I would say this section is quieter for a couple of reasons. 1.) 2K was and still is a good OS.  2.) The good folks at MS didn't pitch this OS to the masses. If they had, XP probably would of been a flop. :-)  But, then again, the timing of the release of 2K there were some hardware issues that could have backlashed on them with the masses.

 

As I have stated in other places, Windows 2000 was never really given a fair shake, in my opinion.

 

First, there was only about a year between the release of Windows 2000 and XP. No real opportunity for Windows 2000 to gain adoption.

 

Then, the dot-com bubble burst and 9/11 followed shortly after. I think these events suppressed demand, and many companies stayed on NT 4.0 Workstation far longer than they may have (NT 4.0 was supported from 1996 to 2004). By the time they were ready to upgrade, they went straight from NT to XP. According to a 2004 article, IDC estimated 17% of servers were still running NT 4.0. (http://www.informati...d/d-id/1029231?)

 

Finally, Microsoft withheld many improvements from 2000 that became available for XP- it never got a tabbed version of Internet Explorer, for example. Windows 2000 received the fewest versions of IE than any other OS in its history. IE 5.x and 6.x, that was it. For companies that standardized only on IE, this hastened the migration to XP. And, for the most part hardware and software companies specifically designed their consumer products around XP, not 2000. 


Desktop: Intel Server SAI2, XP Pro Dual Pentium III-S Tualatin 1.4GHz/2GB RAM

Laptop: IBM ThinkPad T40, XP Pro Pentium M 1.3GHz/2GB RAM
 
 

 


#8
Tommy

Tommy

    Brooke's Tommy Honey <3

  • Moderator
  • 713 posts
  • Joined 19-February 10
  • OS:98SE
  • Country: Country Flag

Windows 2000 is my day-to-day operating system and Windows 98SE is my secondary which hasn't gotten much use lately, but those are my OSes of choice and will be for a very long time to come. If NT4 wasn't as limiting as it is, I would probably use it too.


Daily running Windows 2000 Pro SP4 and Windows 98 Second Edition

Posted Image
Posted Image

Need help getting started with using Windows 2000? Start here!

#9
os2fan2

os2fan2

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 427 posts
  • Joined 09-September 04

Until the summer rebuild of the computer last month, the system routinely booted Windows 2000.  God I miss it.  Currently it's on Vista 6.1 (aka 7).

 

Gave XP the miss.  One laptop has windows xp and 7 on it, but 7 has not been fixed for the GWX virus yet.  The main boxes have GWX antivirus protection running on it.



#10
AnX

AnX

    Fighting for the right to OS since 2010

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 250 posts
  • Joined 20-June 12
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Apart from my main rig that runs Windows 10, i have been setting up a second Win2k box with some older hardware. It's a core 2 duo e7500 with a gig of RAM and a 500gig HDD. Runs Win2k SP4 + USP5.1 + BWC's EXTKernel/Core.

 

Runs quite great due to 2000's lightweight nature.


Main rig:
AMD FX-8320 8-core CPU (OC to 4.4GHz) with Hyper 212 Evo, ASUS M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Motherboard, 16GB 1600MHz RAM, 60GB OCZ Agility II SSD and 500GB WD Blue HDD, ASUS GeForce GTX 960 2GB Graphics Card, 620W Seasonic S12II, CM HAF 912 case.


#11
Dibya

Dibya

    Fighting against death of Windows XP

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 108 posts
  • Joined 22-October 15
  • OS:XP Pro x86
  • Country: Country Flag

My Grandma still run Win NT 4.0 with sp6 in her p3 laptop. Her age is now 86.



#12
roytam1

roytam1

    Junior

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 55 posts
  • Joined 16-April 07

Here still has a NT4 server serving files :)

9FR8JKg.png

eJrmHou.png


  • dencorso and Dibya like this

#13
w2k4eva

w2k4eva

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 40 posts
  • Joined 07-April 15
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

My best/favorite machine is running W2K. It is hardware capable to run XP, Vista, W7, 8 or 10 but I like W2K. Yes there are other newer machines in the house running XP or W7 but they are not as good. It has been down twice for power supply issues, once for HDD failure, and a few shorter outages for power failures, but otherwise has been running W2K continuously since its initial build in 2007.

 

I have a couple others that also run W2K although they are older and do not see daily use any more.

 



#14
win2kreviver

win2kreviver

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 16 posts
  • Joined 21-January 13
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

I have an older PC that runs Windows 2000 without a hitch:

 

AMD Athlon XP 1900 processor

768 MB RAM

Soundblaster AWE32 soundcard

NVidia 4200 128 MB Video Card.

40GB IDE HDD

Plays DVD Movies with no stutter, with VLC, amazing!

Soyo Mobo built about 2002

 

Been doing so since 2009.



#15
ihateusernames

ihateusernames

    Newbie

  • Member
  • 45 posts
  • Joined 20-December 12
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag
I run Win2k on my desktop(s) but not my laptop. The last laptop I had with 2K was a Dell Latitude L400 which crapped out unfortunately. Just got Heroes of Might and Magic 5 from GOG.com, which works in Win2k. (HOMM3, Mount&Blade, and Ys 6 are some other good ones)

#16
thority89

thority89
  • Member
  • 1 posts
  • Joined Yesterday, 12:31 PM
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag
good.rootkit




4 user(s) are reading this topic

1 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users


    JodyT