MSFN Forum: Fat EXE or setup program - MSFN Forum

Jump to content


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Fat EXE or setup program

Poll: Do you prefer a bundled (a.k.a fat) EXE or an installer? (18 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you prefer a bundled (a.k.a fat) EXE or an installer?

  1. Fat EXE (10 votes [55.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 55.56%

  2. Installer (8 votes [44.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 44.44%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Datalore 

  • Friend of MSFN
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 852
  • Joined: 05-October 03

Posted 08 April 2004 - 04:51 PM

I go both ways on this one. I like fat exe's for small little utility programs, the kinds I can just throw in the system32 folder and call via command prompt whenever necessary. But for full-fledge programs like Photoshop, I like installers. Whats your preference?


#2 User is offline   Jono 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 284
  • Joined: 27-September 03

Posted 08 April 2004 - 05:09 PM

i would agree with you, the smaller utilitys should be 'fat exe's' and larger programs as installers

#3 User is offline   CuBie 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 364
  • Joined: 21-February 04

Posted 08 April 2004 - 05:25 PM

Jono, on Apr 8 2004, 05:09 PM, said:

i would agree with you, the smaller utilitys should be 'fat exe's' and larger programs as installers

Yep! I agree!

#4 User is offline   Doggie 

  • I'm very inactive :(
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 2,676
  • Joined: 13-October 02

Posted 09 April 2004 - 03:13 AM

fat exe for me.. some installers even have the balls to get the installed files from the net to install.. rather one file downloaded so u dont need to be on the net all the time (56k person here :))

#5 User is offline   Dude111 

  • Awesome Dude
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 247
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 02 October 2008 - 02:59 AM

I like EXE's that you download and they just run...

They dont screw up the registry (Are less likely to add entries) and they are much better!

#6 User is offline   MillenX 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 178
  • Joined: 17-December 07

Posted 01 March 2009 - 02:01 AM

Fat-exe for small utility

#7 User is offline   pm* 

  • MSFN Patron
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 108
  • Joined: 30-June 09

  Posted 01 July 2009 - 11:17 PM

installer is the best way to make better for us


.exe also better but it not awesome like this



i hate .msi completely

#8 User is offline   pm* 

  • MSFN Patron
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 108
  • Joined: 30-June 09

Posted 01 July 2009 - 11:18 PM

.exe & installer are easy to create through the VB & edit through the restorator

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2013 msfn.org
Privacy Policy