Jump to content
Strawberry Orange Banana Lime Leaf Slate Sky Blueberry Grape Watermelon Chocolate Marble
Strawberry Orange Banana Lime Leaf Slate Sky Blueberry Grape Watermelon Chocolate Marble

MSFN is made available via donations, subscriptions and advertising revenue. The use of ad-blocking software hurts the site. Please disable ad-blocking software or set an exception for MSFN. Alternatively, register and become a site sponsor/subscriber and ads will be disabled automatically. 

Sign in to follow this  
Com_Jever

Bad HD ?

Recommended Posts

Com_Jever    0

i use in my system some samsung SV1604N 160GB, 5400U/min, U-DMA 133. in my bios they sign with 149 gb, in xp with 152 gb. one of them sign only with 122 gb. a hardware check with an samsung utility show it as ok. what can i do ?

and: how can i use the full 160 gb?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mikeh420    0

A 160GB drive has 160,000,000,000 bytes of data, which is really only 149 GB.

(149 x 1024 x 1024 x 1024 = 159,987,520,000)

It's a very questionable practice by drive makers to mis-label the drives. I have a 60GB drive that really has 57GB, I also have a 30GB drive that really has 28GB.

My first IDE HDD was a 84MB Conner that only had 80MB

1 Gigabyte of data is 1,073,741,800 bytes, not 1,000,000,000 bytes, as drive manufacturers seem to think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chaosratt    0

/\ What he said /\

Also, you must consider that on a drive like that, your bios will report the actual drive space, while windows wil report "usable" space, which is slightly less due to formatting.

My WD 160gb is actually like 143gb in size.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×