jdeboeck reducing or XPCREATE which first?
#1
Posted 11 May 2004 - 08:44 AM
#2
Posted 11 May 2004 - 08:55 AM
#3
Posted 11 May 2004 - 03:23 PM
install goes fine but i cant get xplode to eork correctly....
#4
Posted 12 May 2004 - 10:46 PM
slimming down the workload again i c hehe just kidding
#5
Posted 13 May 2004 - 06:32 AM
#6
Posted 17 May 2004 - 02:08 PM
Bye,
Jazz
#7
Posted 17 May 2004 - 02:12 PM
#8
Posted 18 May 2004 - 01:00 AM
Forget it.
As GreenMachine keeps saying, always use a clean source for XPCREATE.
I haven't said thanks yet, but thanks GM, XPCREATE is phantasmagorical!
The only bugs I've seen have been XPCREATED by me:)
#9
Posted 18 May 2004 - 06:39 AM
'Welcome, swampy! Operator Error: Get's 'em every time ...
#10
Posted 20 May 2004 - 12:44 PM
The big question is... Why does windows update think the hotfixes are needed but MBSA does not?
#11
Posted 20 May 2004 - 05:44 PM
...just a thought when msba was updated alot more recently than WU...
N.
#12
Posted 20 May 2004 - 08:46 PM
GrimSage, on May 20 2004, 01:44 PM, said:
The big question is... Why does windows update think the hotfixes are needed but MBSA does not?
maybe it's just me, but no one bothers to search. I've posted before why a few will show up after reducing source. They rely on components. I've also posted in the nLite thread why WU thinks they aren't there, while MBSA thinks they are.
I suggest, XPCREATE then REDUCE. That way you have an updated source, and then it's removed. If the component is removed by REDUCE, then it won't get updated. But if removed first, XPCREATE doesn't know that, so it adds the files back, and then they are registered during setup and errors can arise depending on what it is.
#13
Posted 21 May 2004 - 08:18 PM



Help
Back to top








