MSFN Forum: jdeboeck reducing or XPCREATE which first? - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

jdeboeck reducing or XPCREATE which first? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Markymoo 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 79
  • Joined: 22-April 04

Posted 11 May 2004 - 08:44 AM

Which do i do first jdeboeck slimming down or use XPCREATE first or after?


#2 User is offline   GreenMachine 

  • ineXPlicable
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,062
  • Joined: 22-August 03

Posted 11 May 2004 - 08:55 AM

XPCREATE run and tested first ... then send your error messages to jdeboeck!

#3 User is offline   GrimSage 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 46
  • Joined: 23-November 03

Posted 11 May 2004 - 03:23 PM

i did the reduce first then did xpcreate
install goes fine but i cant get xplode to eork correctly....

#4 User is offline   Markymoo 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 79
  • Joined: 22-April 04

Posted 12 May 2004 - 10:46 PM

@GreenMachine

slimming down the workload again i c hehe just kidding

#5 User is offline   GreenMachine 

  • ineXPlicable
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,062
  • Joined: 22-August 03

Posted 13 May 2004 - 06:32 AM

Workload, and headaches ... Anything is, of course, doable. Everything is not.

#6 User is offline   Jazz 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 137
  • Joined: 03-April 04

Posted 17 May 2004 - 02:08 PM

Well so finally whats the answer ? i'm using nlite for removing junk outta my sources..

Bye,
Jazz

#7 User is offline   Alanoll 

  • CODE tags people, CODE tags!
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 5,496
  • Joined: 25-September 03

Posted 17 May 2004 - 02:12 PM

i would say use XPCreate first. One of teh hotfixes might add something back in, that you had already taken out.

#8 User is offline   swampy 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 92
  • Joined: 26-January 04

Posted 18 May 2004 - 01:00 AM

I tested running nlite before and after XPCREATE, both ended up the same, missing KB828741, KB835732 & Update Rollup 1 KB826939.
Forget it.
As GreenMachine keeps saying, always use a clean source for XPCREATE.
I haven't said thanks yet, but thanks GM, XPCREATE is phantasmagorical!
The only bugs I've seen have been XPCREATED by me:)

#9 User is offline   GreenMachine 

  • ineXPlicable
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,062
  • Joined: 22-August 03

Posted 18 May 2004 - 06:39 AM

I was wondering when I would here something ... and probably not the last!

'Welcome, swampy! Operator Error: Get's 'em every time ...

#10 User is offline   GrimSage 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 46
  • Joined: 23-November 03

Posted 20 May 2004 - 12:44 PM

I suggest reduce then xpcreate. that way hotfixes dont get accidentally removed...

The big question is... Why does windows update think the hotfixes are needed but MBSA does not?

#11 User is offline   tarquel 

  • The Well-wisher
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 838
  • Joined: 03-March 04

Posted 20 May 2004 - 05:44 PM

Maybe Microsoft need to update the engine behind Windows Update :)

...just a thought when msba was updated alot more recently than WU...

N.

#12 User is offline   Alanoll 

  • CODE tags people, CODE tags!
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 5,496
  • Joined: 25-September 03

Posted 20 May 2004 - 08:46 PM

GrimSage, on May 20 2004, 01:44 PM, said:

I suggest reduce then xpcreate.  that way hotfixes dont get accidentally removed...

The big question is... Why does windows update think the hotfixes are needed but MBSA does not?

maybe it's just me, but no one bothers to search. I've posted before why a few will show up after reducing source. They rely on components. I've also posted in the nLite thread why WU thinks they aren't there, while MBSA thinks they are.


I suggest, XPCREATE then REDUCE. That way you have an updated source, and then it's removed. If the component is removed by REDUCE, then it won't get updated. But if removed first, XPCREATE doesn't know that, so it adds the files back, and then they are registered during setup and errors can arise depending on what it is.

#13 User is offline   GreenMachine 

  • ineXPlicable
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,062
  • Joined: 22-August 03

Posted 21 May 2004 - 08:18 PM

I don't know if anyone has ever looked, but my I386\SVCPACK directory gets pretty heavy. I do also add files from the hotfixes that may be unbeknownst to the various sliming procedures. If anyone is interested, they are listed at the end of the TXTSETUP.SIF file.

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy