MSFN Forum: The Best Processor For A Gamer... - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The Best Processor For A Gamer... Is There A Difference? Rate Topic: -----

Poll: From Your Experience, Whats The Best... (147 member(s) have cast votes)

From Your Experience, Whats The Best...

  1. Pentium 3, 800mhz ~ & Up; 100~133mhz FSB (4 votes [4.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.00%

  2. Celeron 4, 2.0ghz; 400mhz FSB, 128 L2 Cache (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. Pentium 4, 2.0~2.4ghz; 400mhz FSB, 256~512 L2 Cache (1 votes [1.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.00%

  4. Pentium 4, 2.4~2.8ghz; 533mhz FSB, 512 L2 Cache (1 votes [1.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.00%

  5. Pentium 4, 2.8~3.2ghz; 800mhz FSB, 512 L2 Cache (3 votes [3.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.00%

  6. Pentium 4, 2.8~3.2ghz; 800mhz FSB, 1mb L2 Cache (7 votes [7.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.00%

  7. Pentium 4 Extreme, 3.0~3.4ghz; 800mhz FSB, 2MB L3 Cache (11 votes [11.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.00%

  8. AMD Athlon XP 1800, 266mhz FSB (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  9. AMD Athlon XP 2200, 266~333mhz FSB (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  10. AMD Athlon XP 2500, 333mhz FSB (7 votes [7.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.00%

  11. AMD Athlon XP 3200, 400mhz FSB (7 votes [7.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.00%

  12. AMD Athlon 64 (13 votes [13.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.00%

  13. AMD Athlon 64 FX (40 votes [40.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 40.00%

  14. It Doesn't Matter, There All The Same. :wacko: (3 votes [3.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.00%

  15. I'am Dazed and Confused... :blushing: (3 votes [3.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Blam-O! 

  • BLaM-O! Inc.
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 351
  • Joined: 18-May 04

  Posted 25 May 2004 - 11:25 PM

OK, here it goes The next WAR...

Please vote for the Processor you think is the best for Gaming From Experience, Not Talk!

This includes the cost of the product, because that is important too. LOL :D


Please Read All Choices Carefully Before Voting... Thanks :rolleyes:
If you don't know the specs of your Processor try to find out first :) lol


#2 User is offline   Doggie 

  • I'm very inactive :(
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 2,676
  • Joined: 13-October 02

Posted 26 May 2004 - 01:33 AM

hmm.. well i've come to a conclusion if you have a decent amount of ram and graphic card to go with is would be an AMD Athlon 2200+ and above.. especially if you have about 1gb of ram and a ATI Radeon 9800 :)

#3 User is offline   TechZ 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: 29-July 03

Posted 26 May 2004 - 01:47 AM

forget the ati 9800, the x800 is the one to get, also the nvidia 6800, they both double the frame rate compared to older cards

#4 User is offline   Blam-O! 

  • BLaM-O! Inc.
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 351
  • Joined: 18-May 04

Posted 26 May 2004 - 02:21 PM

Doggie, on May 26 2004, 01:33 AM, said:

hmm.. well i've come to a conclusion if you have a decent amount of ram and graphic card to go with is would be an AMD Athlon 2200+ and above.. especially if you have about 1gb of ram and a ATI Radeon 9800 :)

hmm, Very true.

#5 User is offline   XtremeMaC 

  • MSFN SuperB
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Joined: 13-October 03

Posted 26 May 2004 - 03:23 PM

agreed with TechZ
those new cards have already beaten the other ones
btw alienware is coming up with dual channel video pci-x thingy
heh what an explanation, they're going to use 2 pci-x slots for graphics, both graphics card will be the same and be working at the same time!!! with intel mb.

I'd go with p4 3.4 Xtreme Edition :) but thats me 2.5mb cache!!! 1-2gb ram

#6 User is offline   Snoop 

  • BACON 'N' EGGS
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 428
  • Joined: 19-August 01

Posted 26 May 2004 - 09:03 PM

Quote

heh what an explanation, they're going to use 2 pci-x slots for graphics, both graphics card will be the same and be working at the same time!!! with intel mb.

you could do that wiht normal PCI card's age's ago rich people used to buy 2x voodoo card's and link them with an sli cable.

so its not really something new and innovative just something that has not been possible while GFX card's have been using AGP slot's of which mobo's only have one

#7 User is offline   Blam-O! 

  • BLaM-O! Inc.
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 351
  • Joined: 18-May 04

Posted 27 May 2004 - 01:10 AM

i know were starting to go off topic a little, so I will just continue it anyway :)


Anyone know about the new Nvidia 6850 ultra comming out (ETA 30 days)? At a retail price of $499.99, they say it will blow away any other video card on the current market with a wopping power hungry 125 watts of dedicated juice just to run the beast!! that's another power supply acording to Nvidia's (WebSite).

but for the money id still have to say the ATI 9800 pro still peforms very well, and only costing you $249.99.

#8 User is offline   Carmon 

  • MSFN's Local Mental Case
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,598
  • Joined: 08-June 03

Posted 27 May 2004 - 02:06 AM

I probly do wiv the Pentium 4 Extreme, 3.0~3.4ghz; 800mhz FSB, 2MB L3 Cache biggest is best in the Gaming world

#9 User is offline   XtremeMaC 

  • MSFN SuperB
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Joined: 13-October 03

Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:33 AM

Snoop, on May 26 2004, 10:03 PM, said:

Quote

heh what an explanation, they're going to use 2 pci-x slots for graphics, both graphics card will be the same and be working at the same time!!! with intel mb.

you could do that wiht normal PCI card's age's ago rich people used to buy 2x voodoo card's and link them with an sli cable.

so its not really something new and innovative just something that has not been possible while GFX card's have been using AGP slot's of which mobo's only have one

yes I know but as u might also know the pci cards are very slow. therefore since the agp came out i don't think anyone has been using the combine the two graphics card method. Therefore I just mentioned that it will once again be avaliable.!


as for the $499 cards. my max budget for a graphics card will me $200.
$500 I could buy billions of other things :)

#10 User is offline   Crispy 

  • Retired Yiffy Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,305
  • Joined: 14-September 02

Posted 27 May 2004 - 03:34 AM

For gaming I would definitly choose an highend AMD 64, some 1-2GB DDR500 RAM and an Geforce 6800U / Radeon X800 XT ...

Would cost a small fortune thou ... :)

#11 User is offline   verlegenmanneke 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 38
  • Joined: 25-May 04

Posted 27 May 2004 - 08:16 AM

I'm happy with my Intel P4 2.8GHZ (overclocked to 3.2ghz) 1Gig RAM
with a cheap MSI GEFORCE FX 5600XT it runs all the games I like.

I invested in a watercooling system instead off buying a 500$ GPU, I prefer less noise then more noise and better graphics.

To buy cheaper I go to Germany. It's a day trip but if I buy enough I save 150$! :D

And in Germany I can drive fast :) we can't do it in Belgium anymore :rolleyes: stupid cops

I hope I didn't offend any cop here :D

#12 User is offline   TechZ 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: 29-July 03

Posted 31 May 2004 - 01:12 AM

my gainward ti4600 cost me $300, never again, vga cards are getting just too expensive, sadly my fav vga company 3dfx fell because of this and now thankfully ati and nvidia are meeting on how to slowdown the current pace of development to keep costs down

#13 User is offline   DiscardME 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 01-June 04

Posted 01 June 2004 - 11:57 AM

Stick with Northwoods. Prescotts run freaking hot and there is little performance gain.

Right now - best bang for the buck is the Northwood P4 2.8. Best video card is the Radeon x800 pro... but if you want cheap, I would go with the 9600 XT. I prefer ATI, but that is only because I have had awesome support from them. I'm biased. :)

#14 User is offline   neosapience 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 157
  • Joined: 01-June 04

Posted 03 June 2004 - 08:30 PM

Please remember that this would only apply if the processor were the only remaining bottleneck on your computer.

A system with a crappy video card wont play ANYTHING well, regardless of the CPU.

#15 User is offline   AztecMystic 

  • Sir Fuzznuts
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 46
  • Joined: 19-May 04

Posted 08 June 2004 - 11:56 AM

neosapience, on Jun 3 2004, 08:30 PM, said:

Please remember that this would only apply if the processor were the only remaining bottleneck on your computer.

A system with a crappy video card wont play ANYTHING well, regardless of the CPU.

it WILL play, but it'll look like crap :)

I'd go for a athlon64 3Ghz, they are getting affordable and along with a 9800pro you can't go wrong. If you just wait a bit, the price of those cards will drop well enough...

Athlon 64 also runs cooler then it's Athlon/Pentium equivalent. The performance gain between a 64 and a 64 fx is next to nothing compared to the extra bucks you put in it. This will be my next config after I get my money from my vacation job :rolleyes:. And then it'll be put into extra ram.

#16 User is offline   Blam-O! 

  • BLaM-O! Inc.
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 351
  • Joined: 18-May 04

Posted 24 August 2004 - 03:47 AM

My next system will have to be an AMD 939 FX53 w/ fsb800mhz, 1gz hyper transport and 1mb L2 cache. It blows Intel into the ground!!!

As They Say,

"AMD Me!" :w00t:

And Buy a video card with 512mb, (When they deceide to make it).
like eVGA.com, e-GeForce 6800 ULTRA, 256MB DDR3 (PCI Express)

twinX DDR2, 2gb pc800

ANd find a good MB from Asus.

That would be SSSWWEEEEEEEETTTT!!!!!! :thumbup :D

That wouldn't cost too much...... :no:

(And Then I Woke Up...)

#17 User is offline   prathapml 

  • Follow the rules please :-)
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 6,791
  • Joined: 14-November 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 24 August 2004 - 05:20 AM

Put together an AMD Athlon64 FX, an nForce3-Pro MoBo, an nVidia GeForce FX6800 gfx, 2 gigs of DDR 433 memory, a 15,000 RPM HD........

Wake up, buddy....... :blink: *pinches self*

#18 User is offline   Lolly 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 57
  • Joined: 15-August 04

Posted 29 August 2004 - 03:50 AM

My CPU isnt on the list, it is AMD XP2600+, runs on 333FSB
I got 1GB RAM and a very lame graphic card; GeForce-Ti4200 128mb,
which Im going to upgrade the next.

Money is teh issue for me, I cannot afford to run after the Best Gear possible,
allthought I've been in sites like AliAlienware to drool over on cool PC's, I think paying 5 grands for a PC sounds a bit silly.

The PC is the worst to put your money on, it will lose the value incredibly fast.
I found out that running about 1 -2 years "behind" the latest Top Gear is so much
cheaper. Plus, all the Games and apps got the patches etc. when finally I got the hardware
to run them.

For example, I have the Doom3 here but I wont be installing it before I get me a new Graphic card,
and thats gonna be in about 6 months. Sure, the x800 etc. looks cool but c'mon,
take a look at the prize tag and guess how much its going to drop only in 6 months.
It is extremely expensive to ride on the latest gear.

Another point I'd like to make. When buying gear I can use weeks on planning
what hardware Im going to get, reading the reviews etc. I found that checking
different hardware forums for extra first-hand opinions from un-biased, regular ppl
is really usefull,
if there is a problem with a , say, motherboard you should find about it
before you buy the thing. Google is pretty cool for finding rants also.
I just want to be sure my hardware works.

New Gear is more likely to have some Monday-Models or Baby-Diseases,
I wont be buying the Latest Graphic Card or MoBo for that reason also,
it is better to wait for the second or third generation versions and
you'll get a working/stable hardware.

I think Totally New Hardware are like Proto Types, the competition is so hard that they
have to come up with New Stuff and they'll likely to mess it up in process.

laters...

#19 User is offline   prathapml 

  • Follow the rules please :-)
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 6,791
  • Joined: 14-November 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 29 August 2004 - 03:57 AM

Hey, Lolly's been the first one here to mention an Alienware-built PC.

Go there dudes, and fetch yourself an "Area-51" machine - if price is no issues.

#20 User is offline   Famer 

  • Aka Snake Plissken
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 629
  • Joined: 07-October 03

Posted 29 August 2004 - 01:19 PM

you could run a dual xeon or dual amd cpu's but games dont support dual cpu's

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy