MSFN Forum: 811493 - Is it needed? - MSFN Forum

Jump to content



Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

811493 - Is it needed? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   powaking 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 29
  • Joined: 26-May 04

Posted 26 May 2004 - 01:03 PM

Just did my first XPCreate and went to windowsupdate and only needed 1 Windows Update (817778 - Not going to bother with that one). But I ran another tool to check for patches and found that 811493 was needed (This update addresses the Buffer Overrun in Windows Kernel Message Handling could Lead to Elevated Privileges (811493) for Windows XP Embedded with SP1).

Anyone know if this is critical? Best method to slipstream? Or should I just wait for SP2? Again windowsupdate doesn't report that this is needed to be installed.


#2 User is offline   Alanoll 

  • CODE tags people, CODE tags!
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 5,496
  • Joined: 25-September 03

Posted 26 May 2004 - 01:10 PM

It's probally because if you read it, it's for Windows XP Embedded. Do you have Windows XP Embedded?

#3 User is offline   powaking 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 29
  • Joined: 26-May 04

Posted 26 May 2004 - 01:24 PM

Well, I did slipstream SP1a. I'm pretty sure my XP disc didn't have SP1a embeded into it. Checked the log and said Found Service Pack Version: 0.

#4 User is offline   Alanoll 

  • CODE tags people, CODE tags!
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 5,496
  • Joined: 25-September 03

Posted 26 May 2004 - 01:34 PM

ummm...

Windows XP Embedded is another version of XP. Like Professional and Home. It's just another variation, primarily used in PalmPC's and other small electronics, like ATMs.

#5 User is offline   powaking 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 29
  • Joined: 26-May 04

Posted 27 May 2004 - 12:54 PM

well, I installed it on a desktop and seriously doubt this version is xp embedded. might just be reading the reg wrong.

#6 User is offline   GreenMachine 

  • ineXPlicable
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,062
  • Joined: 22-August 03

Posted 27 May 2004 - 01:35 PM

Mute point ... the Security Rollup superceeds that hotfix, which just has the ntkrnl*.exe files (or whatever they were called). Otherwise it would be on the list. :)

The Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer is my reference point for hotfix installations. Windows Update is ... flakey.

Welcome to MSFN, powaking!

#7 User is offline   tarquel 

  • The Well-wisher
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 838
  • Joined: 03-March 04

Posted 28 May 2004 - 03:07 AM

lol @ "flakey"

:)

#8 User is offline   GreenMachine 

  • ineXPlicable
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,062
  • Joined: 22-August 03

Posted 28 May 2004 - 04:52 AM

Well, I guess I was in a generous mood!

#9 User is offline   daywalker03 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 80
  • Joined: 20-February 04

  Posted 29 May 2004 - 06:58 PM

GM, MBSA can be flaky if files installed are newer than it expects to find.

#10 User is offline   GreenMachine 

  • ineXPlicable
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 3,062
  • Joined: 22-August 03

Posted 30 May 2004 - 07:49 AM

Yes, but I can handle a "Version greater than expected" error much better than a "Hotfix not installed" error!

#11 User is offline   tarquel 

  • The Well-wisher
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 838
  • Joined: 03-March 04

Posted 01 June 2004 - 10:06 AM

hehe Ditto :)

N.

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2011 msfn.org
Privacy Policy