Windows 2K Security Updates

7 Pages
« First
←
4
5
6
7
→

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

Windows 2K Security Updates detailed info Rate Topic:

#101 BaTLeZone

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 199
Joined: 10-October 03
OS:Windows 7 x86
Country:

Posted 10 February 2005 - 01:05 PM

OPS sorry getting ahead of ya.

I tried a run with IE6.0sp1-KB867282-Windows-2000-XP-x86 in SVC-HF1 but WU still asked for it and I did not get any errors on the install. I am going to try it in SVC-POS and get back to u.

#102 GreenMachine

ineXPlicable

Group: Developers
Posts: 3,062
Joined: 22-August 03

Posted 10 February 2005 - 04:41 PM

Actually, there is a conflict between tho IE updates. I think Bilou_Gateux mentioned it earlier. The work around is to install in a specific order via SVCPACK.INF, and not slipstream the files into the installation. Fixed in the new version ...

#103 BaTLeZone

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 199
Joined: 10-October 03
OS:Windows 7 x86
Country:

Posted 10 February 2005 - 05:28 PM

yup did not work there either. I'll add it to the other 2 that I run from runonce for now.........

......wonders off aimlessly to do some more reading......

edited

#104 GreenMachine

ineXPlicable

Group: Developers
Posts: 3,062
Joined: 22-August 03

Posted 10 February 2005 - 05:34 PM

Cool! If you find it, please tell me!

#105 BaTLeZone

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 199
Joined: 10-October 03
OS:Windows 7 x86
Country:

Posted 10 February 2005 - 06:41 PM

gee sorry GM I did not see your post at the top untill now (I did a refresh) now I feel like I got some egg on my face.

#106 GreenMachine

ineXPlicable

Group: Developers
Posts: 3,062
Joined: 22-August 03

Posted 11 February 2005 - 04:30 AM

Actually, I think it inadvertantly slipped momentarily ... (goodness, those big words hurt my mouth ... )

#107 Bilou_Gateux

Group: Members
Posts: 766
Joined: 03-January 04

Posted 05 March 2005 - 10:57 AM

I have checked WU and we can grab from here special express updates that do not contains outdated binary files but a special file with .psm extension. Look likes infos about Binary files are downloaded from Web and then binary files patched.
log file

Quote

4.093: HttpSendRequest failed 12007
4.093: HttpSendRequest unsuccessful (12029)
4.093: Failed DownloadAndPatchFiles, GLE=0x00002EFD
4.109: HttpSendRequest failed 12007
4.109: HttpSendRequest unsuccessful (12029)
4.109: Failed DownloadAndPatchFiles, GLE=0x00002EFD
4.109: HttpSendRequest failed 12007
4.109: HttpSendRequest unsuccessful (12029)
4.109: Failed DownloadAndPatchFiles, GLE=0x00002EFD
4.109: HttpSendRequest failed 12007
4.109: HttpSendRequest unsuccessful (12029)
4.109: Failed DownloadAndPatchFiles, GLE=0x00002EFD
4.109: HttpSendRequest failed 12007
4.109: HttpSendRequest unsuccessful (12029)
4.109: Failed DownloadAndPatchFiles, GLE=0x00002EFD
4.109: Max download retries exceeded, GLE=0x00002EFD
4.109: DoInstallation:DownloadPatchFiles failed

The name of this update is Windows2000-KB<number>-x86-<language>-express.exe
Most of the HF type 1 are available as Express version
Windows Update.log file

Using these express HF can help to reduce footprint of the HF in SVCPACK.
Full HFs type 1 = 46.2 Mb in SVCPACK
Express HFs type 1 = 10.1 Mb in SVCPACK
Examining KB<number>.log files creation and last modified date properties in %windir% Installation with full HFs replaced with Express HFs in SVCPACK take less than 5mn at SVCPACK stage (T-13).
For my tests (Windows 2000 Server w/o any SP ENU), i have only added SP4 in SPACKS folder, set SLIPHF1=YES in XPCREATE.INI for checking the Type 1 HF integration and only added 30x Windows2000-KB<number>-x86-<language>.exe in SVC-HF1 folder.
Following are the result of my first build with the new XPCreate February 2005 version :
We found duplicate files in the resulting i386 folder, both compressed .??_ and not compressed versions:
DTCSETUP.EX_
LLSSRV.EX_
NTDLL.DL_
SCHANNEL.DL_
We can save some space by replacing the non compressed version by the extracted version of the compressed files and deleting the .??_ (compressed) files. In the original source CD, these files aren't compressed.
DTCSETUP.CAT file should be moved from SVCPACK subfolder to i386 and compressed to replace the original DTCSETUP.CA_
Microsoft have removed the WU checking on Q329115 HF. On a fresh install without any HF applied, WU don't claims about this HF not installed.
On Post #51, i suggested to remove KB839645 HF. You shouldn't because WU checks the registry and claims about this HF not installed although a more recent HF owerwrites the binary files with newer versions.
Already mentionned are the not needed files added in 2 subfolders by KB841356 and DOSNET not needed added lines.

#108 GreenMachine

ineXPlicable

Group: Developers
Posts: 3,062
Joined: 22-August 03

Posted 08 March 2005 - 02:37 PM

Hmmmm ...

Yes, those express files are, indeed, the patches without the binaries, which are then downloaded. These hotfixes cannot be integrated. If just run from SVCPACK.INF, you would also need ab active Internet connection.

As I understood it at the time (long ago ... ), those uncompressed files are used during the setup process, that is why they are uncompressed. It is the compressed versions that are not needed. Like I said, that was a while ago I looked.

I'll have to look into Q329115.

I agree: I will stop adding the sub-directories to DOSNET.INF. Also, I think long file names there can cause problems in DOS based installs.

Thanks again, Bilou_Gateux. I just happened to pass by here again. You really should consider adding new posts, instead of updating your last one, so it catches my attention better!

#109 BaTLeZone

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 199
Joined: 10-October 03
OS:Windows 7 x86
Country:

Posted 12 April 2005 - 01:15 PM

Some new updates came out for win2000:

IE6.0sp1-KB890923-Windows-2000-XP-x86-ENU.exe
Windows2000-KB842773-x86-ENU.EXE
Windows2000-KB890859-x86-ENU.EXE
Windows2000-KB893066-x86-ENU.EXE
Windows2000-KB893086-x86-ENU.EXE
WindowsInstaller-KB893803-x86.exe

I am assuming they go in HF1.

Would WindowsInstaller-KB893803-x86.exe replace WINDOWSINSTALLER-KB884016-V2-X86.EXE or do I need both?

#110 BaTLeZone

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 199
Joined: 10-October 03
OS:Windows 7 x86
Country:

Posted 14 April 2005 - 09:41 AM

Ok....

I put all of the updates in HF1 and win2000 went tilt so I am doing one at a time to find out which one(s) are doing it.

I put WindowsInstaller-KB893803-x86.exe in by it self seems to install ok msiexec /? reports v3.01.4000.1823 . With out this update I get msiexec /? reports v3.00.3790.2538 so it is safe to say that this update replaces the WINDOWSINSTALLER-KB884016-V2-X86.EXE update.

UPDATE

I put IE6.0sp1-KB890923-Windows-2000-XP-x86-ENU.exe in HF1 and all is well.

#111 Bilou_Gateux

Group: Members
Posts: 766
Joined: 03-January 04

Posted 15 April 2005 - 10:19 AM

Thanks BaTLeZone for your reports.

Not enough time to check by myself.
I have temporary added a link to your post on my first post.
Have you tried to remove these HF reported by Incroyable HULK as unecessary
HOTFIXES: Win2000 SP4 – WinXP SP1 – WinXP SP2 #post 484

#112 Bilou_Gateux

Group: Members
Posts: 766
Joined: 03-January 04

Posted 23 April 2005 - 10:40 AM

Update Rollup 1 for Windows 2000 SP4 was released June 28, 2005.
This update rollup contains a list of security-related updates produced for Windows 2000 between the release of Windows 2000 SP4 and April 30, 2005.

+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Windows Security Updates Summary for April 2005
Published April 12, 2005

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-016
Vulnerability in Windows Shell that Could Allow Remote Code Execution (893086)

Security Update for Windows 2000 (KB893086)
Mise à jour de sécurité pour Windows 2000 (KB893086)

Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-017
Vulnerability in Message Queuing Could Allow Code Execution (892944)

Security Update for Windows 2000 (KB892944)
Mise à jour de sécurité pour Windows 2000 (KB892944)

Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-018
Vulnerabilities in Windows Kernel Could Allow Elevation of Privilege and Denial of Service (890859)

Security Update for Windows 2000 (KB890859)
Mise à jour de sécurité pour Windows 2000 (KB890859)

Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-019
Vulnerabilities in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution and Denial of Service (893066)

Security Update for Windows 2000 (KB893066)
Mise à jour de sécurité pour Windows 2000 (KB893066)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-020
Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (890923)

Post #17 on Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1 (SP1) thread

Updated component:

Post #7 on Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) thread

This post has been edited by Bilou_Gateux: 02 July 2005 - 06:22 AM

#113 BaTLeZone

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 199
Joined: 10-October 03
OS:Windows 7 x86
Country:

Posted 26 April 2005 - 08:33 AM

That was it! I took them updates out and put all of the new ones in and everything worked great :thumbup

thanks

EDIT

Nope I was wrong it still does it so I have it narrowed down to one of 2 update I'll get back to you.

#114 Bilou_Gateux

Group: Members
Posts: 766
Joined: 03-January 04

Posted 12 May 2005 - 12:43 AM

This post has been edited by Bilou_Gateux: 02 July 2005 - 06:22 AM

#115 Bilou_Gateux

Group: Members
Posts: 766
Joined: 03-January 04

Posted 12 May 2005 - 12:55 AM

BaTLeZone, on Apr 12 2005, 01:15 PM, said:

As stated by Nazgul in this post #567, WindowsInstaller-KB893803-x86.exe has been removed by Microsoft.

Shouldn't says that: due to bugs? :lol:

#116 BaTLeZone

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 199
Joined: 10-October 03
OS:Windows 7 x86
Country:

Posted 06 June 2005 - 10:10 AM

I found the update that I am having problems with maybe there is another spot I can put it?

Windows2000-KB893086-x86-ENU.EXE

#117 Gagorian

Junior

Group: Members
Posts: 76
Joined: 21-December 04

Posted 06 June 2005 - 07:45 PM

I have it in SVC-HF1 and I haven't experienced any problems (two installations so far).

What kind of problems are you experiencing?

This post has been edited by Gagorian: 06 June 2005 - 07:46 PM

#118 Bilou_Gateux

Group: Members
Posts: 766
Joined: 03-January 04

Posted 17 June 2005 - 09:45 AM

This post has been edited by Bilou_Gateux: 02 July 2005 - 06:40 AM

#119 Bilou_Gateux

Group: Members
Posts: 766
Joined: 03-January 04

Posted 25 June 2005 - 02:57 AM

Two others projects for updating Windows 2000 can be found on this forum:
W2K IE6SP1 Total Slipstream by tommyp
Windows 2000 "Hotstream" Project by Gurgelmeyer

I'm not sure if they're is still a lot of interest for using XPCREATE to build a full patched 2K UACD.

Update Rollup for Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 (SP4) with a planned release in mid-2005 (coming soon?).
I don't want to waste time to update HF lists before this release.

This post has been edited by Bilou_Gateux: 28 June 2005 - 03:18 AM

#120 BaTLeZone

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 199
Joined: 10-October 03
OS:Windows 7 x86
Country:

Posted 01 July 2005 - 12:24 PM

That rollup update is out it is showing in WU as KB891861.

here is the link to it

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...&DisplayLang=en

Could it be slipstreamed in??

This post has been edited by BaTLeZone: 01 July 2005 - 12:42 PM