SFC_OS.DLL hack for XP SP2 Final
#22
Posted 11 August 2004 - 03:25 PM
kolath, on Aug 11 2004, 10:40 AM, said:
Bachus, on Aug 6 2004, 10:31 PM, said:
+1
I have used the hacked SFC_OS.dll + registry method to disable WFP before, but all I really want to do is delete those annoying folders that XP puts in the Program Files directory (e.g. "xerox", "MSN Gaming Zone", "Movie Maker", etc). Is there any way to remove these from the list of protected files rather than disabling WFP altogether. And also, does anyone know why the heck those stupid folders are considered protected system folders in the first place?
Disable WFP, delete the folders, then re-enable it. Does that work?
#23
Posted 11 August 2004 - 05:19 PM
#24
Posted 11 August 2004 - 05:48 PM
RaveRod, on Aug 7 2004, 11:51 PM, said:
How can we test this?
Turning the system clock ahead did not cause it to expire...
thaNX
#25
Posted 11 August 2004 - 06:52 PM
kolath, on Aug 11 2004, 07:19 PM, said:
In that case, it would be nice to be able to remove those entries from the sfcfiles list
#26
Posted 11 August 2004 - 06:57 PM
http://www.msfn.org/...showtopic=21334
@netquik: The SFC_OS.DL_ file attached has been modified with modpe (correct header). It is ready to be put on the CD.
The SFCSetting registry key is added by me so that you can disable WFP while Windows actually looks at SFCDisable (therefore tricking Windows into thinking it's enabled).
In most cases, SFCDisable will turn out to be 0x0000000 while SFCSetting will be 0xffffff9d. That tricks Windows into thinking WFP is enabled but when it comes to removing protected files, it isn't.
#27
Posted 11 August 2004 - 09:18 PM
http://www.ryanvm.ne...fn/sfcfiles.dl_
#28
Posted 11 August 2004 - 09:24 PM
http://www.ryanvm.ne...fn/SFCFILES.DL_
But I know you are just showing off that ryanvm.net !
(GreenMachine.net is long gone, alas)
EDIT:: Silly me: forgot to add Thanks, RyanVM!
#29
Posted 12 August 2004 - 05:05 AM
#30
Posted 12 August 2004 - 07:02 AM
#31
Posted 12 August 2004 - 07:39 AM
RaveRod, on Aug 12 2004, 07:02 AM, said:
#32
Posted 12 August 2004 - 01:58 PM
RaveRod
can you tell me which code is the header CRC?
I have to be ready to manually apply patch to italian version
(this is why i m so curious)
is At offset (0000ECE9)?
#33
Posted 12 August 2004 - 05:03 PM
GreenMachine, on Aug 11 2004, 11:24 PM, said:
http://www.ryanvm.ne...fn/SFCFILES.DL_
But I know you are just showing off that ryanvm.net !
(GreenMachine.net is long gone, alas)
EDIT:: Silly me: forgot to add Thanks, RyanVM!
hehe, didn't realize it was case sensitive
And for what it's worth, I would have attached it but it was too big
#34
Posted 13 August 2004 - 10:50 PM
netquik, on Aug 13 2004, 05:58 AM, said:
Use the ModifyPE program available at unattended.msfn.org. It will modify the PE (CRC) header of SFC_OS.DLL to allow setup to accept it.
#35
Posted 20 August 2004 - 02:10 PM
Edit: And if you use the hacked sfc_os.dl_ do you need to edit i386\hivesft.inf ? The guide says use one or the other but the auther of this thread makes it sound like you need both.
#36
Posted 21 August 2004 - 09:25 AM
Quote
Quote
Raverod earlier in the thread said:
#37
Posted 21 August 2004 - 10:11 AM
gabriel_buc, on Aug 7 2004, 03:58 AM, said:
RaveRod, on Aug 7 2004, 07:42 AM, said:
http://unattended.msfn.org/xp/wfp.htm
@ Adiel, OMERZEN & DaLurker:
If you would just follow the link provided you would find the answer t oyour question.
ok thank u
#38
Posted 21 August 2004 - 11:44 AM
RaveRod, on Aug 13 2004, 10:50 PM, said:
netquik, on Aug 13 2004, 05:58 AM, said:
Use the ModifyPE program available at unattended.msfn.org. It will modify the PE (CRC) header of SFC_OS.DLL to allow setup to accept it.
thanks RaveRod...
I would go with modifyPE in anyway cause i'm going to patch italian version...
so is this the change without CRC question?
At offset (00000F82) change:
CODE
44 00 69 00 73 00 61 00 62 00 6C 00 65
to:
CODE
53 00 65 00 74 00 74 00 69 00 6E 00 67
thanks
#39
Posted 22 August 2004 - 07:24 PM
i have another little question
At offset (00000F82) change:
CODE
44 00 69 00 73 00 61 00 62 00 6C 00 65
to:
CODE
53 00 65 00 74 00 74 00 69 00 6E 00 67
At offset (0000ECE9) change:
CODE
33 C9
to:
CODE
EB 01
okay..
At offset (0000ECE9) I found (SP2 EN)
33 C0 not 33 C9
Am I wrong?
- ← What can you do doring GUI-mode Setup?
- Unattended Windows 2000/XP/2003
- Renaming all Windows folders within setup files →



Help

Back to top









