[Zaheer]

prathapml, on Aug 8 2004, 08:02 PM, said:

Sorry if I came across as too suspicious.
I was just asking questions that anyone would like to know before using something on their production systems.

In any case, what you have carried out seems to be done perfectly fine. Thanks for pointing me to the site which contains instructions to do the same manually myself.

I'm also sorry for being too agressive and accusing you. I should have been more friendly

[Alanoll]

Anyone mind if I sticky this thread? I'm sure in the coming days when more and more people get SP2, there will be many requests for these files

[Jazkal]

Good Idea

[SiMoNsAyS]

sure. sticky!

[tbone587]

how do I slipstream the tcpip.sys file into my xp sp2 cd? what is the process to get that file on and replace it with the current one on the disc?

[Alanoll]

modpe it to correct any checksum error.....
modifype tcpip.sys -c (modifype.exe obtained from unattended.msfn.org)
then makecab the file
makecab tcpip.sys

then copy and replace the original

[tbone587]

thanks for the info. IM not required to disable wfp as well am I?

[prathapml]

tbone587, on Aug 9 2004, 09:50 AM, said:

IM not required to disable wfp as well, am I?

No, no need to disable WFP if you have replaced the TCPIP.SYS at source (I386) - since WFP can't restore an original MS version of it even if it wants to.

[visitor]

Alanoll, on Aug 8 2004, 07:29 PM, said:

...when...more people get SP2, there will be many requests for these files

Any help hacking tcpip.sys for v 5.1.2600.2179?

thaNX

[Denney]

Good work on putting this together.

For the tcpip.sys file, if anyone is searching for the original thread on this, here it is here:

http://www.msfn.org/...showtopic=22640

Note: Towards the end, the unlimited version of the file is available (same as the one here though, I think).

[Zaheer]

Quote

Alanoll, on Aug 8 2004, 07:29 PM, said:

...when...more people get SP2, there will be many requests for these files

Any help hacking tcpip.sys for v 5.1.2600.2179?

thaNX

Sure. Just send me the file and I'll try to edit so it's unlimited.

Quote

Note: Towards the end, the unlimited version of the file is available (same as the one here though, I think).

Yep, the one posted here is exactly the same as the one there.

[visitor]

Zaheer, on Aug 9 2004, 12:13 AM, said:

...send me the file and I'll try to edit so it's unlimited..

PM sent. thaNX.

I suppose just dropping file version 5.1.2600.2180 in there might cause more harm than good, eh?

[Zaheer]

visitor, on Aug 9 2004, 01:35 PM, said:

Zaheer, on Aug 9 2004, 12:13 AM, said:

...send me the file and I'll try to edit so it's unlimited..

PM sent. thaNX.

I suppose just dropping file version 5.1.2600.2180 in there might cause more harm than good, eh?

Got the PM and replied

You could always try the file version 5.1.2600.2180. I doubt it would really do any damage and it would probably work since it's just 1 build different, but I'll just patch your one anyway

[nolookingca]

Check the first post for the untested reg patch.
Question is: Do I need the 0x part before the eight numbers? (after dword:

[Jazkal]

nolookingca, on Aug 9 2004, 04:02 PM, said:

Check the first post for the untested reg patch.
Question is: Do I need the 0x part before the eight numbers? (after dword:

That reg file will work as is.

[nolookingca]

okay, thanks :xmas: oh, well that smiley was worth a try

[Hellman109]

visitor, on Aug 8 2004, 11:11 PM, said:

Alanoll, on Aug 8 2004, 07:29 PM, said:

...when...more people get SP2, there will be many requests for these files

Any help hacking tcpip.sys for v 5.1.2600.2179?

thaNX

http://www.lvllord.d...fix/4226fix.htm

That will do it.

[nolookingca]

Hellman109, on Aug 10 2004, 07:07 AM, said:

http://www.lvllord.d...fix/4226fix.htm

That will do it.

hmm...that's seems like the same as the one I found

[Zaheer]

...and plus i've already edited it for him - it's now unlimited ...

[nolookingca]

yay! Oh wait, I already knew that