MSFN Forum: CDIMAGE v2.52 - MSFN Forum

Jump to content


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

CDIMAGE v2.52 Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   bombtrack 

  • boooom
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 161
  • Joined: 02-January 04

Posted 25 August 2004 - 04:54 PM

does anybody have CDIMAGE 2.52 yet? ive searched for a while and just cant seem to find it.

this google result shows that SP2 ISO files were created with it.

Attached File(s)




#2 User is offline   MCT 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 19-May 04

Posted 25 August 2004 - 07:17 PM

keep us posted if u find it, i would like an updated version too (my current version works good, but updates are always good)

:)

#3 User is offline   sangwooksohn 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 41
  • Joined: 04-July 04

Posted 30 August 2004 - 10:31 AM

I am looking for it too.
Does anyone has it? :P

#4 User is offline   Bâshrat the Sneaky 

  • aka Wim Leers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,214
  • Joined: 29-October 03
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 30 August 2004 - 10:47 AM

There's a GUI version in development (still beta I think)

Looking for the link...

EDIT:

seems 2.52 doesn't exist... Programmer is CyBerain, from Vietnam

http://www.tech-hints.com/xp.html

there you can download
cdimage 2.47
cdimage 3.00 with GUI (beta)

#5 User is offline   evilvoice 

  • Ditchy McAbandonpants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 946
  • Joined: 27-January 04

Posted 30 August 2004 - 01:42 PM

cdimage 3.00 is actually cdimage 2.47...not 3.00, the GUI is beta 3...the 3.00 does not refer to cdimage, but rather his GUI program.

#6 User is offline   Bâshrat the Sneaky 

  • aka Wim Leers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,214
  • Joined: 29-October 03
  • OS:none specified
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 30 August 2004 - 02:21 PM

evilvoice, on Aug 30 2004, 09:42 PM, said:

cdimage 3.00 is actually cdimage 2.47...not 3.00, the GUI is beta 3...the 3.00 does not refer to cdimage, but rather his GUI program.

I know that... :rolleyes:

#7 User is offline   bombtrack 

  • boooom
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 161
  • Joined: 02-January 04

Posted 01 September 2004 - 12:06 PM

Bâshrat the Sneaky, on Aug 30 2004, 05:47 PM, said:

seems 2.52 doesn't exist... Programmer is CyBerain, from Vietnam

CyBerain programmed the GUI not the programm cdimage.exe, cdimage is from microsoft. its an internal tool.

im just wondering if v2.52 really exists, or if nobody from ms has leaked it yet :P

#8 User is offline   evilvoice 

  • Ditchy McAbandonpants
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 946
  • Joined: 27-January 04

Posted 01 September 2004 - 12:20 PM

I really dont see how 2.52 is gonna be any better, but I believe 2.52 will be on windows pe sp2.

#9 User is offline   Tribble 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 85
  • Joined: 01-June 04

Posted 03 September 2004 - 01:03 AM

And i dont really think Cyberain is still working on his GUI Version, since Beta 3 is old as hell already. I mean not that there is a reason to work on it, b/c there dont seems to be any problems with the beta 3.

But im interested in CDImage v2.52, too :)

#10 User is offline   risolutore 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 29
  • Joined: 08-July 04

Posted 03 September 2004 - 03:08 AM

it exists.
it was used to realize the iso of sp1 winserver03.
I don't have it, :-))

#11 User is offline   prathapml 

  • Follow the rules please :-)
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 6,791
  • Joined: 14-November 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 03 September 2004 - 11:21 AM

And what are you people basing your assumption (of the cdimage v2.52 existing) on?
The "creator Application" field in an ISO?
That can be changed to anything you want - you can even make it say the ISO was created by cdimage v6.890 or whatever.....


The current version of cdimage is good (no bugs, no new features needed by MS). And the cdimageGUI beta3 (by CyBerian, mentioned above) uses that version of cdimage.exe, and seems good enough too. The rationale for a new release normally is on the basis of bugs or new requested features/functionality - both of which are not currently visible. So the conclusion is that this is probably just a wild goose chase!

#12 User is offline   contender 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 03-January 04

Posted 29 September 2004 - 06:23 PM

Hi
if someone looking for CDIMAGE 2.52 you will find it here

Attached File(s)



#13 User is offline   jdoe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 314
  • Joined: 02-May 04

Posted 29 September 2004 - 06:34 PM

@contender

Sorry to disappoint you, but this is a fake. The real version of this file is 2.47 which is the current version we all know.

FAKE

FAKE

FAKE

:no:


EDIT:

If you want version 9.88 there it is (so easy to change version number) :P

#14 User is offline   contender 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 03-January 04

Posted 29 September 2004 - 06:52 PM

jdoe

I have checked this file with my cd and its works just fine .


CDIMAGE 2.52 CD-ROM and DVD-ROM Premastering Utility
Copyright © Microsoft, 1993-2000. All rights reserved.
For Microsoft internal use only.

Usage: CDIMAGE [options] sourceroot targetfile

-l volume label, no spaces (e.g. -lMYLABEL)
-t time stamp for all files and directories, no spaces, any delimiter
(e.g. -t12/31/2000,15:01:00)
-g encode GMT time for files rather than local time
-h include hidden files and directories
-n allow long filenames (longer than DOS 8.3 names)
-nt allow long filenames, restricted to NT 3.51 compatibility
(-nt and -d cannot be used together)
-d don't force lowercase filenames to uppercase
-c use ANSI filenames versus OEM filenames from source
-j1 encode Joliet Unicode filenames AND generate DOS-compatible 8.3
filenames in the ISO-9660 name space (can be read by either
Joliet systems or conventional ISO-9660 systems, but some of the
filenames in the ISO-9660 name space might be changed to comply
with DOS 8.3 and/or ISO-9660 naming restrictions)
-j2 encode Joliet Unicode filenames without standard ISO-9660 names
(requires a Joliet operating system to read files from the CD)
When using the -j1 or -j2 options, the -n, -nt, and -d options
do not apply and cannot be used.
-js non-Joliet "readme.txt" file for images encoded with -j2 option
(e.g. -jsc:\location\readme .txt). This file will be visible as
the only file in the root directory of the disc on systems that
do not support the Joliet format (Windows 3.1, NT 3.x, etc).
-u1 encode "UDF-Bridge" media
-u2 encode "UDF" file system without a mirror ISO-9660 file system
(requires a UDF capable operating system to read the files)
-ur non-UDF "readme.txt" file for images encoded with -u2 option
(e.g. -usc:\location\readme .txt). This file will be visible as
the only file in the root directory of the disc on systems that
do not support the UDF format.
-us sparse UDF files
-ue embed file data in UDF extent entry
-uf embed UDF FID entries
-uv UDF Video Zone compatibility enforced
-b "El Torito" boot sector file, no spaces
(e.g. -bc:\location\cdboot. bin)
-p Platform ID for the "El Torito" boot catalog
-e Do not set floppy emulation mode in El Torito boot catalog
-s sign image file with digital signature (no spaces, provide RPC
server and endpoint name like -sServerName:EndPoint Name)
-x compute and encode "AutoCRC" values in image
-o optimize storage by encoding duplicate files only once
-oc slower duplicate file detection using binary comparisons rather
than MD5 hash values
-oi ignore diamond compression timestamps when comparing files
-os show duplicate files while creating image
(-o options can be combined like -ocis)
-w warning level followed by number (e.g. -w4)
1 report non-ISO or non-Joliet compliant filenames or depth
2 report non-DOS compliant filenames
3 report zero-length files
4 report each file name copied to image
-y test option followed by number (e.g. -y1), used to generate
non-standard variations of ISO-9660 for testing purposes:
1 encode trailing version number ';1' on filenames (7.5.1)
2 round directory sizes to multiples of 2K (6.8.1.3)
5 write \i386 directory files first, in reverse sort order
6 allow directory records to be exactly aligned at ends of sectors
(ISO-9660 6.8.1.1 conformant but breaks MSCDEX)
7 warn about generated shortnames for 16-bit apps under NT 4.0
b blocksize 512 bytes rather than 2048 bytes
d suppress warning for non-identical files with same initial 64K
l UDF - long ads used in file entries instead of short ads
r UDF - number of ad's is random
w open source files with write sharing
t load segment in hex for El Torito boot image (e.g. -yt7C0)
f use a faster way to generate short names
-k (keep) create image even if fail to open some of the source files
-m ignore maximum image size of 681,984,000 bytes
-a allocation summary shows file and directory sizes
-q scan source files only, don't create an image file

NOTE: Many of these options allow you to create CD images
that are NOT compliant with ISO-9660 and may also
NOT be compatibile with one or more operating systems.
If you want strict ISO and DOS compliance, use the -w2
warning level and correct any discrepencies reported.
YOU are responsible for insuring that any generated CDs
are compatible with all appropriate operating systems.
Also note that Microsoft company information is placed
in the image volume header, so don't use this program
to generate CDs for companies other than Microsoft.


#15 User is offline   prathapml 

  • Follow the rules please :-)
  • Group: Patrons
  • Posts: 6,791
  • Joined: 14-November 03
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 29 September 2004 - 06:54 PM

BTW, there was already a topic about this in the multi-boot forum, by the same name too!
*moving to multi-boot forum

#16 User is offline   jdoe 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 314
  • Joined: 02-May 04

Posted 29 September 2004 - 07:03 PM

@contender
If you download my 9.88 version you will see that it work fine either but the point is the real version is 2.47


This tread should be closed or removed to stop confusion

Mod???

#17 User is offline   jroc 

  • 18 Bravo
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 235
  • Joined: 17-August 03

Posted 29 September 2004 - 07:50 PM

prathapml, on Sep 3 2004, 06:21 PM, said:

And what are you people basing your assumption (of the cdimage v2.52 existing) on?
The "creator Application" field in an ISO?
That can be changed to anything you want - you can even make it say the ISO was created by cdimage v6.890 or whatever.....

its based on this information...obtained from Microsoft and MSDN...personally..that MS used 2.52...but i think the one posted here is fake..the headers and time stamps are the same.

Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2 RTM Update English CD ISO
(NOTE: This CD is NOT the whole OS, SP2 RTM update only)
VRMSP_EN
2004-08-04 12:00:00.00
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND WA 98052, (425) 882-8080
CDIMAGE 2.52 (03/09/2004 TM)

#18 User is offline   jroc 

  • 18 Bravo
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 235
  • Joined: 17-August 03

Posted 29 September 2004 - 07:56 PM

yeah..i think its fake..the 2.47 and this 2.52 have the same time stamp and header info...bu there is a 2.52...I got this info from MSDN a while back.

Microsoft MSDN Library July 2004 DVD ISO
QTR55ENUD1
2004-05-23 17:00:00.00
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND WA 98052, (425) 882-8080
CDIMAGE 2.47 (10/12/2000 TM)

Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2 RTM Update English CD ISO
(NOTE: This CD is NOT the whole OS, SP2 RTM update only)
VRMSP_EN
2004-08-04 12:00:00.00
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND WA 98052, (425) 882-8080
CDIMAGE 2.52 (03/09/2004 TM)

#19 User is offline   dosar 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 31-August 04

Posted 03 October 2004 - 06:05 AM

Where can I download cdimage.exe 2.52 from the Web?

Attached File(s)



#20 User is offline   jroc 

  • 18 Bravo
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 235
  • Joined: 17-August 03

Posted 03 October 2004 - 06:35 AM

right now...there is specualation about this version....however the MSDN ISO shows to be packed with 2.52...and alot of others are looking for this...some kid hex edited 2.47 to show 2.52 so be aware of any fake version....but to anwser your question....2.52 seems to be a mystery....and 2.47 works just fine.

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users



All trademarks mentioned on this page are the property of their respective owners
Copyright © 2001 - 2013 msfn.org
Privacy Policy